CFPB Takes First MSA-Related Action in Nearly Two Years; Orders Mortgage Lender to Pay $3.5M Civil Penalty for Kickbacks

by Goodwin

On January 31, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced that it ordered a California-based mortgage lender to pay $3.5 million in civil penalties for an illegal mortgage kickback scheme.  According to the CFPB, the lender entered into several different referral programs with multiple third parties, each of which the CFPB contends violated Section 8(a) of Real Estate Settlements Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2607(a).  Although the consent order targets alleged violations relating to marketing service agreements (MSAs), a prior CFPB target, its scope is much broader – also taking aim at a host of other third party relationships.  Lenders should take notice that the range of conduct targeted by the CFPB included:

  • Lead Agreements with more than 200 different counterparties;
  • Exclusive MSAs with more than 120 counterparties;
  • Desk licensing agreements;
  • Co-marketing agreement with a loan servicer;
  • Co-marketing agreements with brokers involving sharing advertising costs on third-party websites; and
  • Broker counterparties requiring borrower preapproval with the lender;
  • Encouraging broker counterparties to use loan fees and credits to influence lender selection.

Under the lead agreements, the lender allegedly required brokers to enter exclusivity arrangements to sell potential borrowers’ names and contact information only to the lender.  The lender allegedly then compensated brokers directly based on the number of leads received.  Under the MSA arrangements, the lender paid real estate brokers monthly fees for performing marketing services on the lender’s behalf.  The CFPB alleges these fees were, in effect, impermissible referral kickbacks because the brokers were allegedly compensated based on the number of referrals they were able to make to the lender in a given month.  Under the desk license agreements, the lender into arrangements with real estate brokers to locate its loan officers onsite with the brokers.  However, the lender’s payments to brokers allegedly were not based on office space rental, but instead tied to the number of referrals the lenders received each month.

There were several types of challenged co-marketing agreements, which the lender entered into after it ended its MSAs in 2015.  The first involved an origination agreement with a loan servicer where the servicer was compensated for customers who refinanced using the lender.  Another involved a new enforcement focus, sharing costs with real estate agents for third party website advertising.  The CFPB alleges the lender required agents’ advertisements on any third-party websites to exclusively promote the lender, and in exchange, the lender would subsidize the agents’ advertisements; the CFPB determined such an arrangement involved an illegal kickback.

Finally, the CFPB also alleges RESPA was violated where the lender’s agreements with brokers allegedly required brokers to have prospective buyers obtain preapproval from the lender before the buyer could make an offer on the home.  In return the lender paid cash bonuses for each referral, and waived certain fees if the buyer obtained a loan through the lender.  Relatedly, the CFPB alleges the lender also encouraged brokers to insert terms in real estate contracts that would steer consumers toward using the lender.

According to the consent order, many of the brokers or agents received a fixed monthly fee, which the lender adjusted depending on the number of referrals actually received.  Under RESPA and its implementing regulation (Regulation X, 12 C.F.R. part 1024), illegal kickbacks are not allowed on federally related mortgages.  Such tactics also violate Section 1036 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA), 12 U.S.C. § 5536.  Per the terms of the consent order, the lender agreed to cease its referral programs, pay $3.5 million in civil penalties, and satisfy various reporting requirements.  The CFPB also entered into similar orders with two real estate brokers and a servicer that provided lender with referrals.  The orders are available herehere, and here.  The servicer and two real estate brokers agreed to pay $495,000 in consumer relief.

This is one of the most significant enforcement actions the CFPB has taken involving RESPA referral arrangements, and it is especially noteworthy for its focus on desk licensing agreements, and co-marketing arrangements.  It is noteworthy that the legality of both of these types of arrangements have support in pre-CFPB RESPA guidance.  It is unclear if this Consent Order signals an intent by the CFPB to expand its marketing-arrangement RESPA focus beyond traditional MSAs now that many lenders have exited such arrangements.

The CFPB has made no secret of its disapproval of MSAs, but this is the first MSA enforcement action taken since October 2015, when the CFPB issued compliance Bulletin 2015-05 cautioning against the use of MSAs due to the “substantial legal and regulatory risk of violating RESPA.”  The Bulletin noted that MSAs “often involve providers of settlement services in a mortgage loan transaction, such as a lender, real estate agent or broker, or a title company … [and are] framed as payments for advertising or promotional services, but in some cases the payments are actually disguised compensation for referrals.”  The CFPB stated that “determining whether an MSA violates RESPA requires a review of the facts and circumstances of each case,” but provided a list of examples where it believed MSAs were in fact disguising kickbacks and referral fees.  Despite the bulletin’s relatively hard line on MSAs and referrals, the CFPB had yet to publicly announce another MSA-re lated enforcement action until this past week, perhaps due in part to many lenders publicly and privately exiting MSAs after the Bulletin.  For more on Bulletin 2015-05, please see the post from our sister blog, Lender Law Watch.

Prior to Bulletin 2015-05 , the CFPB had announced several enforcement actions that caused the mortgage industry to reexamine its third party relationships.  For example, in September of 2014, the CFPB announced an order in a similar action against a title insurance agency, Lighthouse Title.  According to the  2014 order, Lighthouse entered into MSAs with companies, such as real estate brokers, where the companies would refer business to the title insurance agency in exchange for payments.  As in the above action, Lighthouse allegedly made payments based on the number of referrals it received or expected to receive.  Pursuant to the consent order, the title insurance agency agreed to pay $200,000 in civil penalties and agreed to terminate its MSAs.

Further, as covered by Enforcement Watch in January and April of 2015, the CFPB and the Maryland Attorney General announced the issuance of related orders against two large lenders and their executives relating to an alleged kickback scheme with a title company.  CFPB asserted that the banks’ loan officers referred loans for closing to the title company in exchange for cash, consumer data, and marketing materials.  As part of the settlement, the lenders agreed to pay $24 million in civil penalties and $11.1 million in redress to affected consumers.  Nearly three months later, the CFPB entered into consent orders with the title company’s executives and named loan officers, banning the individuals from the mortgage industry and requiring them to pay a total of $662,500 in redress and penalties.

Also in early 2015, as previously reported by the Enforcement Watch, the CFPB announced a consent order with a Maryland-based nonbank lender relating to an alleged deceptive advertising and a kickback scheme.  The Maryland lender’s purported scheme involved the advertising of VA mortgage products to military veterans.  The order resulted in the lender’s cessation of all deceptive marketing, endorsement and kickback practices, as well as the payment in $2 million in civil penalties.

It remains to be seen whether the CFPB’s most recent enforcement action signals a broader focus by the CFPB on different kinds of third-party relationships in the mortgage industry beyond MSAs.  Any party involved in such relationships should carefully consider them in light of the Consent Order, as well as the CFPB’s prior guidance on the issue, such as  Bulletin 2015-05.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Goodwin on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.