Claims Are Construed In Electronic Communications Case

Morris James LLP
Contact

Cox Communications Inc., et al. v. Sprint Communications Company, L.P., et al., C.A. No. 12- 487-SLR, March 21, 2016.

Robinson, J.   Claim construction opinion issues regarding 43 terms from five patents. 

The disputed technology relates to data transmissions in electronic devices. The following terms  ­­­­were considered :

  1. “Processing system”
  2. “Signaling processor”
  3. “Call processor”
  4. “Control system”
  5. “Interworking unit”
  6. “First communication format /second communication format”
  7. “first format/second format”
  8. "[Second communication format is a]  connectionless communication format”
  9. “Converting the communications between a time division multiplex format and another format”
  10. “First connection I second connection”
  11. “connection
  12. “Asynchronous communication”
  13. “"Communication system”
  14. “Routing”
  15. “Identifier(s)”
  16. "In the processing system"
  17. "in the signaling processor"
  18. "in the call processor"
  19. "in the control system”
  20. “Processing ... to select”
  21. “Processing …to participate in selecting”
  22. “Processing ... to transfer”
  23. “Processing … to participate in transferring”
  24. “Selecting a service and a service node”
  25. “Generating [a message] /[messaging]”
  26. “Transmitting ... [a first message] / [a second message]"
  27. "transferring ... [a message] / [messaging]”
  28. “Receiving messages”
  29. “Message(s)”
  30. “control [message] / [messaging”
  31. “service”
  32. “service node"
  33. "service platform system”
  34. "Receiving and processing call routing data to fill ... data tables with the     call routing data”
  35. “control system data tables"/ "call processor data Tables”
  36. “transferring the call routing data from the control system data tables to call processor routing tables”
  37. "formatting the call routing data for the call processor data tables”
  38. “Transferring the call routing data from the control system data tables to call processor routing tables”
  39. Formatting the call routing date for the call processor data tables”
  40. “user communications”
  41. “Compression instruction”
  42. “Compressing”
  43. “DSO connection”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide