DOJ Announces New Voluntary Safe Harbor Policy for Mergers & Acquisitions

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
Contact

Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a new safe harbor policy for voluntary self-disclosures made in connection with mergers and acquisitions on Wednesday. Pursuant to this new policy, the DOJ will not prosecute companies that self-report potential violations occurring within an acquisition target's business. Here are the key parameters of the M&A self-disclosure policy:

  • The self-disclosure must be made within six months of a deal's closing.
  • The six-month threshold applies whether the misconduct was discovered pre- or post-acquisition.
  • The acquirer will have one year after the close to fix the issues.
  • These deadlines could be extended “depending on the specific facts, circumstances and complexity of a particular transaction.” (Conversely, the deadlines do not apply to companies that detect misconduct threatening national security or involving ongoing or imminent harm. Those companies must disclose and remediate immediately.)
  • Disclosure must be coupled with cooperation in the ensuing investigation, appropriate remediation and potentially, payment of certain fines, restitution or disgorgement.
  • The safe harbor applies across the Department of Justice. (However, it would not be binding if the company is investigated by other agencies or the Securities and Exchange Commission.)
  • Misconduct disclosed under the policy will not be factored into future recidivist analysis for the acquiring company.

Beyond offering this self-disclosure carrot, Monaco also reiterated DOJ’s willingness to use the stick, warning that “if your company does not perform effective due diligence or self-disclose misconduct at an acquired entity, it will be subject to full successor liability for that misconduct under the law.”

More generally, Monaco emphasized the importance of corporate compliance. She highlighted that well-designed compliance programs should “align executives’ financial interests with the company’s interest” by tying compensation systems to the compliance program (including through executive compensation clawbacks).

This is a good reminder for companies that their compliance programs must be effective, tested and designed to address the DOJ’s recent recommendations. Effective compliance programs and strong corporate governance are important tools to help mitigate against enormous financial risks and penalties. 

Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated. The information contained in this blog is general in nature and is not offered and cannot be considered as legal advice for any particular situation. The author has provided the links referenced above for information purposes only and by doing so, does not adopt or incorporate the contents. Any federal tax advice provided in this communication is not intended or written by the author to be used, and cannot be used by the recipient, for the purpose of avoiding penalties which may be imposed on the recipient by the IRS. Please contact the author if you would like to receive written advice in a format which complies with IRS rules and may be relied upon to avoid penalties.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miles & Stockbridge P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
Contact
more
less

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide