EPA Given Additional Time to Ponder Next Steps on Clean Power Plan as Court Grants Another Stay

by Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Over the last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit stayed two high-profile litigations concerning the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from new and existing coal-fired power plants. By granting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s requested stays, the Court provided the agency with additional time to weigh its options on whether to suspend, revise, or rescind the rules.

Clean Power Plan Litigation Stayed Additional 60-Days

On August 8, 2017, the Court extended the stay of the Clean Power Plan litigation, State of West Virginia v. EPA (Consolidated Case No. 15-1363), for an additional 60 days. This is the second 60-day extension; the first stay was granted by the Court on April 28, 2017. The Clean Power Plan requires existing stationary power plants to reduce their CO2 emissions by 32 percent from a 2005 baseline by 2030.

The stays follow the White House’s March 28, 2017 Executive Order 13783, entitled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth,” that directs U.S. EPA Administrator Pruitt to review the Clean Power Plan to ensure it aligns with the Administration’s priorities. In other words, to review and publish for notice and comment a proposed rule to suspend, revise, or rescind the rule.

In support of the stays, the U.S. EPA argued that the Court should allow the agency more time to complete its review of its regulatory and administrative options and preserve judicial resources. In contrast, Clean Power Plan supporters contend that since the Court heard en banc oral arguments back on September 27, 2016, it should issue a decision on the merits. If not, a remand to the agency would be preferable to holding the litigation in abeyance indefinitely. The recent stay order does require the U.S. EPA to provide monthly status reports to the Court, which may provide some clarity on the future of the rule, but it appears that we will have to wait another two months for a more definite resolution.

The Supreme Court halted the implementation of the rule in February 2016 and remanded the challenge to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. If there is a decision on the merits, the question will certainly be appealed to the Supreme Court.

U.S. EPA Reminded of its Statutory Obligation to Regulate Greenhouse Gases

The recent stay order included a concurring statement by Circuit Judges David S. Tatel and Patricia A. Millett pointing out that the U.S. EPA has an “affirmative statutory obligation to regulate greenhouse gases” under the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007). The judges expressed concern that an indefinite delay in the litigation could impede the U.S. EPA from complying with that obligation.

To fulfill this obligation, the U.S. EPA may be looking to replace, not rescind the rule. Reports from a late-July meeting between the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Office of Management and Budget, and U.S. EPA staff, indicated that regulated industry is looking for a new, revised plan that still limits power plants’ emissions, but is narrower in scope than the current Clean Power Plan.

Instead of viewing the electricity system as an interconnected entity that requires regulation beyond a coal-fired plant’s physical parameters, a new plan may focus on efficiency and other on-site operational improvements solely at the plants themselves, and would not take the same “outside the fence-line” approach to regulating emissions sought by the current Plan. Some stakeholders are also pressuring the U.S. EPA to attack its underlying obligation and overturn the agency’s 2009 finding that greenhouse gases endanger the public health and welfare. Many agree that this task would be extremely difficult as the agency would be required to show scientific evidence that greenhouse gases are not contributing to climate change. In the face of so much evidence to the contrary and that humans are contributing to the greenhouse gases, this may prove impossible.

As this issue progresses and U.S. EPA considers its options, please check back to the blog for further updates.  

Court Also Stayed Litigation Concerning Carbon Pollution Standards for New, Modified, and Reconstructed Power Plants

In other news, on August 10, 2017, the same court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, granted the U.S. EPA’s request to stay the North Dakota v. EPA (Consolidated Case No. 15-1381) litigation. This case concerns the EPA’s final rule, Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gases from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units (80 Fed. Reg. 64509), which regulates CO2 emissions from new coal-fired power plants. The March 28, 2017 Executive Order also directs EPA Administrator Pruitt to review this regulation and possibly suspend, revise, or rescind the rule.

Many view this ruling as inconsequential as no new coal-fired plants are in the development pipeline. Several factors have contributed to this reality including more competitively priced and available natural gas, more difficulty in financing such projects, and the growth of low-cost renewable energy sources.

The status of these litigations has been discussed before on this blog on April 6, 2017 - Environmental and Energy Policy Round-Up: Status of Regulations and Key Decisions under the New Administration and on May 23, 2017 - Update - Environmental and Energy Policy Round-Up: Status of Regulations and Key Decisions under the New Administration.

Amici Curiae Participation in Clean Power Plan Litigation

Van P. Hilderbrand Jr. assisted a consortium of major consumer brand companies with significant energy footprints in nearly every state in the nation prepare and file a joint Amici Curiae brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit supporting the Clean Power Plan. The motion to participate and brief described the challenges that these major brands from diverse industries face in procuring electricity from low- and zero- greenhouse gas emitting sources, and the challenges that climate related risks pose to their businesses.

Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated. The information contained in this blog is general in nature and is not offered and cannot be considered as legal advice for any particular situation. Accessing this blog and reading its content does not create an attorney-client relationship with the author or with Miles & Stockbridge. The author has provided the links referenced above for information purposes only and by doing so, does not adopt or incorporate the contents. Any federal tax advice provided in this communication is not intended or written by the author to be used, and cannot be used by the recipient, for the purpose of avoiding penalties which may be imposed on the recipient by the IRS. Please contact the author if you would like to receive written advice in a format which complies with IRS rules and may be relied upon to avoid penalties.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miles & Stockbridge P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.