EU & Competition Law Update – June 2016

by Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner


Office – London
Author – Robert Bell

What do you need to know?

Despite the UK's vote to leave the European Union ("EU"), companies doing business in the UK can still continue to trade with the EU in exactly the same way as they have done in the past, at least for the time being.

The UK is still a member of the EU and until it negotiates an exit deal, or the two year period for the re-negotiation for such a deal expires, the UK remains a full member of the EU subject to its rights and obligations under the EU treaties.

The vote

The UK woke up on the 24 June 2016 to the news that the UK had voted to leave the EU by 52% to 48%. 

Although the vote was always forecast to be close, the British public voted by a larger than expected margin to leave. The British Prime Minister, Mr. David Cameron, has stepped down and Theresa May is taking over as Prime Minister from 13th July 2016.

So, in the aftermath of this historic vote, what does this really mean for companies trading in the UK and their access to the European single market?

The hysterical reaction of a number of UK politicians would lead us to believe that this vote will immediately lead to a reappraisal of the UK 's relationship with the EU and that many EU laws will now change.

While the vote has certainly heightened uncertainty in the international markets, companies trading in the UK will not be affected in the aftermath of this vote. Their ability to access the single EU market tariff free and conduct business will remain unchanged.

The Exit Process

Now that the UK has voted, the UK has to give notice to leave the EU under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. Once it does, there is a two year period in which to negotiate an exit treaty. Once that period ends, the UK leaves the EU whether an exit treaty has been negotiated or not. The two year period can be extended by mutual agreement of the UK and the EU.

The UK has not yet given notice under Article 50 and it is unclear when it will. Several leading Brexiteers have argued that they want to negotiate the terms of the UK's divorce without being put in the straightjacket of the two year period. The EU says it won't negotiate leaving terms until Article 50 is exercised.

However, until an exit treaty is signed or the two year period expires (or any extensions mutually agreed between the UK and the EU) the UK is fully bound by its EU Treaty rights and obligations. That means that unless the UK wants to breach its international treaty obligations it cannot dis-apply EU law nor the reach of the CJEU judges.

So, from a legal perspective nothing is going to change for a long time. In fact the UK is still going to be legally obliged to implement new EU Directives as long as the UK is a member. Depending upon the terms of the UK's exit deal, the country may still find itself having to implement those laws to gain access to the EU single market and to obey the free movement rules.

The vote is only the start of a long process and the challenges of the Brexit issues, both legally and politically, are only just beginning.

Where do we go from here?

The UK has to negotiate a deal to leave the EU. No Member State has seceded from the EU. Only Greenland (as part of Denmark) left and that was over 25 years ago. The UK is in unchartered waters. 

However, it appears clear that the EU is unlikely to do the UK any favours in these negotiations. It will not compromise its fundamental principles of free movement of goods, services, capital and people and so the UK may have to rely on international trading rules to access the EU markets which may mean tariffs and other restrictions or – much more likely – agree a free trade deal based on membership of the EEA (like Norway).

Many political commentators believe that if the UK does not negotiate to have free access to the EU single market the UK Parliament is unlikely to ratify the Treaty. The Leave vote did not cover what the leaving terms should be so it is far from clear how the Brexit drama will play out.

This is unlikely to be a "leave the EU at all costs" vote. It is more likely to be just re-arranging the chairs in this EU game of musical chairs.


Office – Paris
Author – Kathie Claret and Francois Xavier Mirza

One of the first missions of the French Polynesian Competition Authority ("PCA"), which was created in February 2015 but which officially started its activity a year later, will be to rule on the proposed purchase by HNA Tourism Company Ltd of the entire share capital of two hotels belonging to prominent French Polynesian businessman Mr. Louis Wane: the SA Moorea Lagoon Resort (owner of the Hilton Moorea Lagoon Resort & SPA in Moorea) and the SARL Société Hôtelière Motu Ome'e (owner of the hotel St. Régis in Bora Bora). 

HNA Tourism Group Company Ltd is a subsidiary of the large private Chinese group, Hainan Airlines, founded in 2000. It is involved in a range of activities across multiple tourism-related sectors including air transport through Hainan Airlines (ranked fourth in the Chinese aviation industry).

Pursuant to the so-called Organic Law of 2004, which sets out the various fields of law which are reserved to France and those which fall within the ambit of the French Polynesia semi-autonomous regime, any foreign (i.e., non French-controlled) investment in French Polynesia relating to the acquisition of real estate rights, fishing, aquaculture, pearl and mother-of-pearl, or the audiovisual or telecommunications sectors requires prior authorization from the French Polynesian government. In the present case, HNA Tourism received such authorization, published on 21 April 2016.

However, pursuant to the French Polynesian Law of 23 February 2015, the proposed purchase is considered a potential concentration subject to review by the PCA, since the total net turnover of both groups involved is greater than 2 billion XPF (approximately 16.8 million euros) and the total net turnover of each individual party group is greater than 500,000,000 XPF (approximately 4 million euros). Thus, with its foreign investment authorization in hand, HNA Tourism Company Ltd, in accordance with the law, notified the proposed purchase to the PCA on 7 June 2016. Assuming that such notification file is complete, the PCA has 25 days to render a decision.

This case is amongst the first "merger control" cases to be reviewed by the newly created PCA, which has the power to refuse or authorize the purchase or subject it to additional conditions in order that competition not be distorted. 


Office – Germany
Authors – Eckart Budelmann

On 12 April 2016, the Cartel limb of the German Federal Supreme Court in Karlsruhe (the "Court") codifies its rules on concerted actions between market participants from an antitrust perspective.

Case No. KZR 31/14 involved a claim by a broadband cable provider (the "Plaintiff") that ten major public service broadcasters (the "Defendants") had been colluding in such a way as to restrict and distort competition within the market. Specifically, the Plaintiff alleged that the Defendants had exchanged commercially sensitive information, conspired to restrict their services to digital broadcasting, and agreed to terminate their existing contracts with broadband cable providers.

Despite there being no written contracts in evidence to this effect, the Court nevertheless opined that the contract terminations were unlawful under Sec. 1 German Competition Act, which prohibits agreements and concerted practices between undertakings which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition.

In the view of the judges, a concerted action with anticompetitive effect will be automatically proven where competitors exchange information regarding their future market behaviour. Such conduct inevitably violates the principle of a competitive market in which each participant must decide independently on the market strategy pursued, and inescapably has a detrimental effect on the relevant market.

In its decision, the Court has limited the scope for inter-company information exchanges and adopted a presumption of detrimental competitive effect in such circumstances. As the burden of proof in such cases rests with the defendant, it remains to be seen what level of proof the courts will require from defendants in order to disprove an alleged violation of Sec. 1 German Competition Act.


Office – London
Authors – Nicola Conway and Roman Madej

On 25 May 2016, the UK's Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA") issued a statement of objections to five of Britain's most prestigious modelling agencies alleging an infringement of Chapter I of the Competition Act 1998 and/or Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU").

The CMA's investigation, which was launched back in March 2014, has revealed that the five prominent agencies may have exchanged sensitive and confidential competitive information and colluded to fix prices between April 2013 and March 2015. Specifically, concerns have been raised that the agencies agreed on a common approach to setting their fees in an effort to reduce customers' abilities to play agencies off one another. Such a strategy benefits models (whose wages increase) and their agencies (which are generally entitled to a percentage of models' earnings) – but it unavoidably dampens competition.

The Senior Director of the CMA's Cartels and Criminal Group, Mr. Stephen Blake, has stated that "the allegations concern prices charged to a range of customers, including high street chains, online fashion retailers and consumer goods brands. The CMA alleges that these five model agencies sought to achieve higher prices in negotiations with their customers by colluding instead of competing."

This is the first competition enforcement case taken forward by the CMA in the creative industries, and as such it represents a test case for the CMA in many ways. In contrast, the CMA is well-versed in imposing fines for cartel activity in relation to commodities – take, for example, canned mushrooms, alternators and starters, and optical disc drives.

The peculiarity of the case raises an interesting predicament. The punishment of price coordination in these circumstances would benefit retailers and consumers alike since inflated fees charged by the agencies to retailers, which are inescapably borne by customers as the costs trickle down the retail chain to consumer level, would be reduced. However, increased price competition in this sector of the economy would disadvantage working models whose wages (and potentially working conditions) would be subject to more aggressive negotiation, and inevitably lowered.

No conclusion of illegal conduct has been reached at this stage; the CMA must first consider the responses from the recipients of its statement of objections before it reaches any decision. In the event that the alleged market manipulation is proven, the agencies may find themselves exposed to significant fines of up to 10% of their worldwide revenue, whilst directors may face disqualification from UK company directorship for 15 years and even, in extreme cases, imprisonment for up to 5 years.

The CMA's decision is highly anticipated.


Office – Italy
Authors – Mr. Luigi Zumbo and Mr. Arturo Battista

On 8 June 2016, the Italian Competition Authority ("ICA") opened an in-depth investigation into Poste Italiane S.p.A. (the "Accused Company"), the former public postal services operator.

The investigation was commenced after a complaint was filed by competing Italian company, Nexive S.p.A. (the "Complainant"), which reported conduct allegedly amounting to an abuse of dominance in contravention of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU").

In particular, the Complainant states that the Accused Company, which enjoys a dominant market position, costs its services to large business users in such a way as to exclude other operators in postal services from the market.

The alleged wrongdoing is not proven at this stage and the investigation continues. However, the ICA has opined that such conduct, if proven, would amount to an infringement of Article 102 TFEU on the grounds that it would adversely affect trade within the EU.


Office – Paris
Author – Kathie Claret and Raphaël Roditi

By decision rendered on 9 June 2016, the French Competition Authority ("FCA"), in accordance with the Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel (the French broadcasting authority), rejected a request by French pay TV pioneer Canal Plus to obtain clearance for the acquisition of exclusive broadcasting rights for the Qatar sports channel, beIN Sports, on the grounds that "the conditions are not currently satisfied to lift the ban on exclusive broadcasting of premium sport channels pronounced against Canal Plus".

In 2006, the Canal Plus Group company ("CPG") had been authorized by the Minister of Economy to buy TPS, its main pay TV competitor, and to merge it with CanalSat in which it held a majority stake, subject to 59 commitments. On 20 September 2011, the FCA sanctioned the non-compliance by CPG with certain of these commitments by withdrawing the merger authorization and imposing a 30 million euro fine. The proposed operation was the object of a new merger review after which the FCA, by decision rendered on 23 July 2012, gave its authorization subject to compliance with 33 injunctions designed to restore sufficient competition in the pay TV market. These injunctions were imposed for a five-year period, after which a further competitive analysis is to take place. Moreover, the FCA provided that the parties could seek a lifting or an adjustment of the injunctions in the event of fundamental changes.

Notably; among these measures is injunction no. 4(a) which prohibits the broadcasting of premium sports channels by CPG under an exclusive distribution contract.

On 16 February 2016, CPG sought clearance from the FCA to enter into an exclusive distribution contract with beIN Sports before the expiry of the commitment. It was argued that circumstances had changed since 2012, in particular that the competition situation had evolved with the emergence of new players and a wider choice for consumers since the merger of SFR and Numericable. Moreover, in order to relieve anticompetitive concerns, CPG proposed another range of commitments.

Nevertheless, the FCA rejected this review request due to what it considered to be a lack of sufficiently changed circumstances of law and fact since the 2012 decision - it considered "the anticipated review of the injunctions no.4(a) and 8(a) to be unjustified to this date, even if it were accompanied by the adoption of the commitments proposed by CPG". 

The FCA considered that, as was the case in 2012, the market structure is still close to a duopoly with CPG and beIN sports holding the broadcasting rights of the quasi-entirety of the most appealing sports competitions (particularly football rights). Likewise, on the downstream market of distribution of pay TV services, CPG also holds a dominant position with a market share comprised between 70% and 80% (according to the FCA).

Therefore, the FCA considers that the measures implemented in 2012 form a coherent whole and that injunction no.4(a) cannot be analysed independently of others, in order to preserve competition while maintaining sufficient consumer access to differentiated offers.

This is considered to be a setback for CPG, which counted on the beIN Sports agreement to revive its client base after a recent period during which Canal Plus has been losing subscribers and suffering recurrent financial losses, a difficult situation that even the Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel acknowledged (although those circumstances were not sufficient for it to issue a favourable opinion on the project).


Office – Italy
Authors – Mr. Luigi Zumbo and Mr. Arturo Battista

On 6 June 2016, the Italian Administrative Court of Latium (the "IAC") sought to overturn a €793,829 collective fine previously imposed by the Italian Competition Authority (the "ICA") on 23 companies providing TV program services in Italy (the "Companies").

The fine was imposed on the grounds that the Companies had colluded in relation to their bids during a 2013 tender competition involving RAI-Radiotelevisione Italia S.p.A. ("RAI"), the Italian state-owned television incumbent.

Such tenders were based on a "lowest bid mechanism". The ICA held that the discounts were too similar to be the result of true competition and considered that the Companies had already decided amongst themselves who the tender winner should be, in violation of Article 2 of Law No. 287/1990 (the Italian provision against anti-competitive agreements). 

However, the ICA decision was challenged by the Companies and the IAC has now opined that the conduct of the Companies should not be considered illegal on the grounds that the ICA had not taken into account the fact that RAI enjoyed a dominant position (a de facto monopoly) on the demand side. Indeed, RAI represented the only possible "client" of the TV program services and consequently it was able to decide the winner of the tender and/or the price; making the alleged collusion of the Companies irrelevant from a competition law point of view.

In light of the IAC opinion, an appeal of the decision before the Italian Supreme Administrative Court ("Consiglio di Stato") is anticipated.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.