Federal Circuit Addresses Standing in Decision on Appeal from PTAB

by Goodwin

Last week, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paragon Bioteck, in which the court held that Altaire had standing to appeal the PTAB’s final written decision in a post-grant review (“PGR”) of Paragon’s U.S. Patent No. 8,859,623 and reversed-in-part and vacated-in-part the PTAB’s Final Written Decision.

In the Final Written Decision, the PTAB held that Altaire had failed to prove that the ’623 patent was invalid for obviousness.  Altaire appealed the PTAB’s decision and Paragon challenged Altaire’s standing to bring the appeal on the basis that Altaire was not “now engaging in infringing activities and any future plans it may have to engage in infringing activities are, at most, contingent.”  Of note, Altaire had argued that it intended to file an ANDA seeking approval of its own product.

Meanwhile, prior to the PTAB’s decision, two declaratory judgment actions were pending between the parties.  Altaire had filed a suit against Paragon seeking a declaratory judgment that Paragon had breached a non-disclosure agreement between the two companies by filing the application for the ’623 patent.  Paragon had responded by alleging that Altaire had breached the agreement and seeking the right to terminate the agreement early.  Altaire later filed a second suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the ’623 patent is invalid for, among other things, failing to name Altaire’s Chief Executive as an inventor and seeking to correct the inventorship.

The Federal Circuit held that Altaire had standing to bring the appeal under Article III of the U.S. Constitution.  The court found that Altaire had sufficiently demonstrated “imminent harm” to satisfy the requirement for “injury in fact” for standing, while noting that “all the normal standards for redressability and immediacy” of the injury do not apply when a statue provides an appellant with a right to appeal, as with PTAB proceedings.  In particular, in the declaratory judgment action, Paragon was actively seeking a declaratory judgment that it could terminate the agreement between the parties and Paragon had refused to stipulate that it would not sue Altaire for infringement of the ’623 patent.  And even if Paragon was not successful in terminating the agreement, it would expire in 2021, thus subjecting Altaire to the threat of an infringement suit at that point anyhow.  Furthermore, Altaire planned to file its own ANDA and Altaire had previously “demonstrated its production and marketing capabilities [by manufacturing and marketing its proprietary formulation as Paragon’s NDA product], such that it will be able to resume operations without difficulty.” The Federal Circuit concluded that in view of the specific circumstances at issue in this case, Altaire had sufficiently demonstrated imminent harm based on Altaire’s belief that “Paragon will inevitably sue Altaire for patent infringement” when Altaire files its ANDA and that invalidating the ’623 patent in the PGR was imperative to removing the patent as an obstacle to the filing and approval of the ANDA.  The court explained that “the threat of future injury may be sufficient to establish injury in fact if the threat was real and imminent.”

The court also found that the harm to Altaire was “concrete and particular” because the patent is “an obstacle to the filing and approval of Altaire’s ANDA for its proprietary product, which was [allegedly] misappropriated in the ’623 patent by Paragon.” The court also found that, based on the specific facts at issue here, the injury to Altaire was compounded by the risk that it would be estopped from asserting certain arguments about the ’623 patent in future infringement litigation by the adverse decision by the PTAB.

On the substance of the appeal, the Federal Circuit held that the PTAB improperly refused to consider data from experimental tests and technical testimony of Altaire’s Chief Executive because Altaire had “failed to timely qualify [the CEO] as an expert.”  In reversing the PTAB decision, the Federal Circuit noted that the regulation governing use of technical data in a PGR does not require the corroborating testimony to be delivered by an expert, and that Altaire had responded to Paragon’s arguments about the CEO’s qualifications and the applicability of the data at the earliest opportunity to do so.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Goodwin on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.