FTC Commissioners Explore Path for Data Security Enforcement Following Major Eleventh Circuit Decision Vacating Common FTC Order Language as Too Vague

by King & Spalding
Contact

In LabMD v. FTC, the Eleventh Circuit vacated an order requiring a company to implement a data security program “reasonably designed” to protect information.  Following the LabMD decision, the FTC announced a series of public hearings addressing topics including data security and privacy.  During the first of those hearings, on Thursday, September 13, FTC Deputy Director for Economic Analysis James Cooper said the country is at an “inflection point” regarding data privacy and security enforcement and questioned whether the FTC needs to “rethink” its regulatory framework.

In June, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its opinion in LabMD, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission,[i] narrowing the Federal Trade Commission’s ability to issue broad remediation orders in response to alleged data-security deficiencies.  In LabMD, the court vacated an FTC order requiring LabMD to “establish and implement, and thereafter maintain, a comprehensive information security program that is reasonably designed to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of personal information collected from or about consumers.”[ii]  The court held that the FTC’s order was unenforceable for failing to prohibit any specific acts or practices.[iii]  The opinion raises questions about numerous FTC data-security orders entered in adversarial proceedings and about the enforceability of such broad remediation orders moving forward.  That said, the court declined to resolve a challenge to the FTC’s authority to commence proceedings to remediate cybersecurity deficiencies in the absence of a statutory or common-law predicate that confers this authority.  A ruling on that issue was unnecessary given the court’s holding that the remediation order was unenforceable.  This leaves a Third Circuit decision recognizing the FTC’s authority to regulate in this space as the only circuit decision published on this question, and the FTC will thus remain an active regulator of cybersecurity while this question continues to be litigated. 

Factual Background of LabMD Decision    

In 2007 and 2008, the computer of a billing manager for LabMD, Inc. contained a 1,718-page file with the personal information of 9,300 consumers, including names, Social Security numbers, and medical and health insurance information.[iv]  Contrary to company policy, the billing manager’s computer was connected to LimeWire, a peer-to-peer file sharing network, and the employee designated for sharing his “My Documents” folder, in which the 1,718-page file was stored.[v]  In February 2008, data security company Tiversa Holding Corp. used LimeWire to download the file and began marketing its security services to LabMD based on its discovery of the file.  When LabMD refused to buy Tiversa’s remediation services, Tiversa reported LabMD’s allegedly poor security structure to the FTC.[vi]

The FTC investigated the incident and issued an administrative complaint against LabMD listing a number of data security measures that the company allegedly failed to perform.  After much litigation brought the issue before the full Commission for a ruling, the FTC found that LabMD failed to implement “reasonable security measures” to protect consumer information, which in turn constituted an “unfair act or practice” under Section 5(a) of the FTC Act.”[vii]  The Commission further held that the evidence established actual substantial injury, or the likelihood thereof, because the unauthorized disclosure of the consumer information file caused intangible privacy harm, and the mere exposure of the consumer information file on LimeWire was likely to cause substantial injury.[viii]  The Commission rejected LabMD’s argument that the FTC’s reasonableness standard for determining what data-security practices were “unfair” was void for vagueness.[ix]

The Commission entered an order enjoining LabMD to “establish and implement, and . . . maintain, a comprehensive information security program that is reasonably designed to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of personal information collected from or about consumers.”[x]  The order contained no prohibitions or specific measures or protocols for LabMD to adopt.  The order instead stated that the data security program shall “contain administrative, technical, and physical safeguards appropriate to respondent’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of respondent’s activities, and the sensitivity of the personal information collected from or about consumers.”[xi]

Eleventh Circuit’s LabMD Opinion

LabMD petitioned for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.[xii]  On appeal, LabMD argued, among other things, that the Commission lacked authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act to hold that LabMD’s data security practices were unfair, and that the Commission’s injunction was impermissibly vague.[xiii]

The Eleventh Circuit agreed with LabMD’s vagueness argument, concluding that the Commission’s order of injunctive relief was unenforceable because it did not direct LabMD to cease committing any unfair act or practice within the meaning of Section 5.[xiv]  The court explained that the Commission’s Order “does not instruct LabMD to stop committing a specific act or practice,” but rather “commands LabMD to overhaul and replace its data-security program to meet an indeterminable standard of reasonableness.”[xv]  Any attempt to enforce the FTC’s Order for alleged deficiencies by LabMD, the Eleventh Circuit noted, would lead to district court proceedings in which LabMD and the FTC would present competing experts as to what constitutes “reasonable” data security practices—essentially placing the district judge in the position of managing LabMD’s cyber security program according to the FTC’s ongoing demands.[xvi]  Accordingly, the Eleventh Circuit vacated the order.

The Eleventh Circuit sidestepped the larger question of whether the FTC’s Section 5 mandate to enjoin unfair practices extends to data security. Although the court did not decide the issue, it did provide several pages of dicta regarding the question, offering considerable context for discussion.  The court first summarized the FTC’s statutory authority to investigate and enjoin unfair practices under Section 5, noting that a finding of “unfairness” requires (1) a substantial injury, (2) that is not outweighed by any countervailing benefits to consumers or competition, and (3) that could not reasonably have been avoided.  Focusing on the second factor, known as the public policy factor, the court emphasized that a finding of unfairness cannot be premised on abstract or general values and instead must be grounded on a specific statute, judicial decision, or Constitutional provision.[xvii]  The Eleventh Circuit offered one on its own, pointing to common-law negligence in administering a deficient security program.  The court carefully stopped short of concluding that common-law negligence is a sufficient ground for a finding of unfairness, and instead simply assumed arguendo that it is, before moving on and vacating the remediation order on vagueness grounds.[xviii]

Import of the Eleventh Circuit’s LabMD Decision

The Eleventh Circuit’s decision not to reach the larger question of the FTC’s authority to regulate data security has disappointed many who were hoping for resolution of this issue.  The decision leaves a single circuit court ruling on this issue—a 2015 Third Circuit decision rejecting a party’s arguments that Section 5 did not give the FTC power to remedy allegedly deficient data-security practices.[xix]  In the absence of a ruling to the contrary by another circuit, regulated entities can expect that the FTC will remain an active regulator in the data security space, although the Section 5 question will continue to be litigated until additional circuit courts—and perhaps the Supreme Court—provide additional clarity.

Still, the LabMD opinion takes the interesting approach of offering an analytical roadmap to this important issue, even though it ultimately passes on a decision.  The court’s instruction that the FTC must predicate any findings of unfairness upon a specific statute, court decision, or Constitutional provision offers ammunition to those who continue to challenge FTC’s assertion that it has broad authority to regulate data security incidents.  At the same time, the FTC might reject this language as only dicta, or it might adopt the court’s reasoning and attempt to ground future enforcement actions on purported findings of common-law negligence in a company’s failure to maintain a secure data privacy environment.  The FTC also might try to rely on its authority to regulate “deceptive” practices by challenging companies that have made representations in privacy policies or other forward-facing statements.

As to the narrower issue of the scope of FTC remediation orders, LabMD may impact the FTC’s practice of issuing broad data security orders, at least in the Eleventh Circuit and possibly beyond, as discussed below.   The FTC may attempt to define specific prohibited or required acts or practices in more granular detail, or define “reasonable” cybersecurity standards in more precise technological terms going forward.  The Eleventh Circuit’s approach may be more unworkable than intended, as it can be impractical to craft a remediation order that prospectively addresses all possible security concerns, when a broader reference to recognized industry standard such as those published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) offer a practical solution.  Indeed, during the FTC’s September 13 hearing regarding Competition and Consumer Protection, discussed further below, former Commissioner Ohlhausen encouraged people to “pay attention to” the efforts of NIST, among other actors, to pass a uniform privacy framework.  And, the FTC Act allows parties to challenge Commission orders in any circuit where “the act or practice in question was used” or in any circuit where the party “resides or carries on business.”[xx]  For many large businesses today, the FTC Act’s petitioner-friendly jurisdictional grant could potentially allow the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling to effectively have a nationwide effect.

Finally, the Eleventh Circuit’s decision may call into question the FTC’s ability to seek sanctions and civil monetary penalties for certain alleged violations of data security consent orders the FTC has already issued.  Many of the FTC’s recent data security consent orders contain requirements almost identical to those contained in the order struck down in LabMD.[xxi]  Although parties accepting consent orders issued by the Commission generally waive their right to challenge the validity of the Commission’s order,[xxii] parties facing civil actions brought by the FTC for penalties for alleged violations of consent orders are likely to cite LabMD in negotiating a favorable resolution with the Commission.  Specifically, parties may argue that, pursuant to precedent requiring “clear and convincing evidence that a lucid and unambiguous consent order has been violated,”[xxiii] the FTC cannot establish a violation of a consent order’s requirement that a party must maintain “a comprehensive information security program that is reasonably designed to protect” consumer information. 

The FTC’s Response to the LabMD Decision

Following the LabMD decision, the FTC announced it would hold 15 to 20 public hearings over the next few months regarding “Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century.”[xxiv]  The topics to be addressed by the hearings include data security and privacy, among other items.[xxv]  According to FTC Deputy Director for Economic Analysis James Cooper, the goal of the hearings is to continue the FTC’s tradition of “calibrat[ing] its enforcement” and to “balance consumer interests and privacy and data security with the remarkable benefits . . . that the digital economy provides.”  Therefore, the FTC’s stated goal is to “identify opportunities to develop the law consistent with its enforcement authority.”[xxvi]

The FTC held the first of the scheduled hearings on September 13, 2018 at Georgetown University Law Center.[xxvii]  In his opening statement during the hearing, FTC Chairman Joseph Simons said  the FTC’s “most significant and difficult consumer protection issues often revolve around the use and abuse of technological capabilities” not previously imagined.  No clear consensus emerged during the first hearing, but commentators identified problems with the current regulatory regime, such as the lack of predictability or overarching federal privacy framework.  Former FTC Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen, who served as Acting FTC Chairman until April 2018 and stepped down from the FTC in late September 2018, argued in favor of the FTC’s case-by-case approach because it allows for greater flexibility in enforcement, and reduced the need to predict the future to design regulations.  Further, she noted that the FTC’s unfairness authority “works particularly well” where there hasn’t been a promise made to the consumer, but there is an “expectation that consumers won’t be injured through data collection and use.”  It is likely that future hearings—especially the hearings on Privacy, Big Data, and Competition scheduled for November 6-7, 2018—will further inform and illuminate the FTC’s plans for changes to data security and privacy enforcement.[xxviii]

The FTC held the first of the scheduled hearings on September 13, 2018 at Georgetown University Law Center.[xxvii]  In his opening statement during the hearing, FTC Chairman Joseph Simons said  the FTC’s “most significant and difficult consumer protection issues often revolve around the use and abuse of technological capabilities” not previously imagined.  No clear consensus emerged during the first hearing, but commentators identified problems with the current regulatory regime, such as the lack of predictability or overarching federal privacy framework.  Former FTC Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen, who served as Acting FTC Chairman until April 2018 and stepped down from the FTC in late September 2018, argued in favor of the FTC’s case-by-case approach because it allows for greater flexibility in enforcement, and reduced the need to predict the future to design regulations.  Further, she noted that the FTC’s unfairness authority “works particularly well” where there hasn’t been a promise made to the consumer, but there is an “expectation that consumers won’t be injured through data collection and use.”  It is likely that future hearings—especially the hearings on Privacy, Big Data, and Competition scheduled for November 6-7, 2018—will further inform and illuminate the FTC’s plans for changes to data security and privacy enforcement.[xxviii]

[i] LabMD, Inc. v. F.T.C., 894 F.3d 1221 (11th Cir. June 6, 2018).

[ii] Id. at 1236.

[iii] Id. at 1224.

[iv] Id.

[v] Id.

[vi] Id. at 1224–25.

[vii] Id. at 1226–27.

[viii] Id.

[ix] Id. at 1227.

[x] Id. at 1236.

[xi] Id.

[xii] Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.  § 45(c), a party may appeal an order of the Commission in any Court of Appeals for “any circuit where the method of competition or the act or practice in question was used or where” the party “resides or carries on business.”  15 U.S.C. § 45(c).

[xiii] See generally, Brief of Petitioner, LabMD v. F.T.C., 2016 WL 7474626 (Dec. 27, 2016).

[xiv] LabMD, Inc., 894 F.3d at 1236–37.

[xv] Id. at 1236.

[xvi] Id. at 1236–37.

[xvii] Id. at 1229 n.24.

[xviii] Id. at 1237.

The FTC has not offered any substantive reaction to the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling.  According to Reuters, the Commission said in a statement that it was “disappointed” by the ruling, but that it “will continue to do everything [it] can to protect consumer privacy,” and that it is “evaluating [its] next steps in response to this decision.”  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ftc-datasecurity-labmd/u-s-agency-loses-appeal-over-alleged-labmd-data-security-lapses-idUSKCN1J22XD.  The FTC could seek rehearing en banc before the Eleventh Circuit and/or seek review before the Supreme Court, but it has not indicated that it will do so.

[xix] F.T.C. v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 799 F.3d 236, 243–49 (3d Cir. 2015).

[xx] 15 U.S.C. § 45(c). 

[xxi] For example, the FTC’s consent orders for Uber, Lenovo, and Facebook all purport to require the respondent to establish, implement, or maintain “a comprehensive information security program that is reasonably designed” to “protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of personal information” of consumers, or some close facsimile. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1523054_uber_technologies_revised_decision_and_order.pdf (Uber shall “establish and implement, and thereafter maintain, a comprehensive privacy program that is reasonably designed to. . . protect the privacy and confidentiality of Personal Information.”); https://www.ftc.gov/system/ files/documents/cases/152_3134_c4636_lenovo_united_states_decision_and_order.pdf (Lenovo shall “establish and implement, and thereafter maintain a comprehensive software security program that is reasonably designed to . . . protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of covered information.”); https://www.ftc.gov/sites/ default/files/documents/cases/2012/08/120810facebookdo.pdf (Facebook, same as Lenovo).

[xxii] See 16 C.F.R. § 2.32 (“Every agreement in settlement of a Commission complaint shall . . . waive further procedural steps and all rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge or contest the validity of the order.”).

[xxiii] Porrata v. Gonzalez-Rivera, 958 F.2d 6, 8 (1st Cir. 1992).

[xxiv] Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission Announces Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century, https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/hearings-competition-consumer-protection-21st-century/hearings-announcement_0.pdf. While the FTC has not explicitly stated that the hearings are a direct response to the LabMD decision, they appear to be at least somewhat motivated by a desire to find an objective guiding framework for future data privacy enforcement.

[xxv] Id. at 4.

[xxvi] Id. at 1.

[xxvii] FTC Hearing #1: Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/2018/09/ftc-hearing-1-competition-consumer-protection-21st-century.

[xxviii] Federal Trade Commission, Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century, https://www.ftc.gov/policy/hearings-competition-consumer-protection.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.