FTC Reinstates Notice and Approval Requirements in All Merger Settlement Agreements

Epstein Becker & Green

Epstein Becker & Green

Prior to 1995, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) required parties to a Commission Order entered in a merger case to obtain the FTC’s prior approval for any future transaction in similar markets above a de minimis threshold. This frequently included the requirement to provide prior notice of transactions that fell below the reporting thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (“HSR”).

In 1995, pursuant to its Policy Statement on Prior Approval and Prior Notice Provisions (“Policy Statement”), the FTC ended its blanket practice of requiring prior notice and approval in merger cases.  At that time, the FTC concluded that the HSR process provided an effective means of investigation, challenging most anticompetitive transactions before they occurred, and that implementation of this new Policy Statement would act as a guardrail against questionable exercises of enforcement discretion.  In addition, the FTC concluded that in circumstances where a credible concern that parties to an unlawful merger might attempt the same or similar transaction, or engage in an otherwise unreportable anticompetitive merger, a more narrow prior approval provision would be appropriate.

Recently, however, claiming that the FTC is too understaffed and burdened to rely on HSR alone, the Commission voted 3-2 to rescind the 1995 Policy Statement, and revert back to the pre-1995 requirement that all merger-related settlement agreements include notice and prior approval provisions.  This reversion back to the pre-1995 policies may increase merger costs, potentially deter the entry of pro-competitive transactions, and possibly inject more uncertainty into the merger enforcement process.  It also provides another example of the FTC’s apparent shift from enforcer to regulator.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Epstein Becker & Green | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Epstein Becker & Green

Epstein Becker & Green on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.