Hot Employment Topics for 2014 - Part I: The New World of Disabilities Discrimination

by Jackson Walker
Contact

This is the first of a seven-part series describing "Hot Employment Topics for 2014." Part I focuses upon "The New World of Disabilities Discrimination."

Adoption of the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act. Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) in 2008, and such amendments became effective in 2009 for claims arising after the effective date. The stated purpose of the legislation was to reinstate a broad scope of protection under the ADA, specifically intended to override Supreme Court decisions in Toyota Motor Mfg., Inc. v. Williams (2002) and Sutton v. United Airlines (2000), which had strictly construed the term "disability." In the Williams case, the Court had determined that someone injured for less than one year was not "disabled;" in the Sutton case, the Court had determined that a person who could "mitigate" his or her condition by medication, glasses or some other reasonable means was not "disabled."

Because claims arising after the effective date took some time to make their way through the administrative and judicial pipelines, review of the ADAAA at the Circuit Court of Appeals level has only recently burgeoned. Early indications from the federal courts of appeals indicate that the ADAAA will present fresh challenges for employers who must confront the guidelines within which to comply.

Summers v. Altarum Institute Corp.–Temporary Injuries as Disabilities. Such challenges are exemplified by a new decision in Summers v. Altarum Institute Corp. (Jan. 23, 2014), issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which covers Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina.

In that case, an able bodied employee who worked as a "senior analyst" for a government contractor fell and injured himself while exiting a commuter train on his way to a work assignment. The injuries were severe, and the employee required significant surgery and leave time. His ability to walk was impaired, and doctors projected that he would need at least 7-8 months of recuperation before being able to resume normal duties. His employer encouraged him to seek short-term disability benefits and indicated that some effort would be made to determine whether the employee could work from home during his recovery. However, the employer ultimately did not discuss any accommodation for the employee's work schedule and instead terminated his employment because he could not perform his duties on site.

The employee sued under the ADAAA, and his claims were dismissed by the district court, which held that because he had a "temporary condition" which would not last more than one year, he was "not disabled." The employee challenged this determination at the Fourth Circuit, which confronted head on the scope and meaning of the term "disability" under the ADAAA.

The Fourth Circuit overturned the dismissal of the complaint. It noted that based upon the wording and legislative intent expressed in the ADAAA, the statute now favored an interpretation which promoted "broad coverage of individuals." This emphasis included within its reach the statutory interpretation of the term "substantially limits," which defines a disability as "substantially limiting one or more major life activities." The Court of Appeals also noted the EEOC's regulations under the ADAAA, including a statement that even "effects of an impairment lasting or expected to last fewer than six months can be substantially limiting."

Identifying itself as the first Court of Appeals to apply the ADAAA's expanded definition of "disability," the Court held that the employee was "disabled," even if only for 7-8 months. The Court specifically rejected the lower court's finding that the employee could not pursue a claim under the ADAAA because he could have continued to work in a wheelchair while convalescing; it further rejected the employer's claim that one who is expected to heal fully from a temporary impediment cannot be "disabled," and that an able-bodied person who is injured temporarily cannot be "disabled."

Neely v. PSEG Texas, Ltd. P'ship. (Need to prove existence of a "disability"); Mann v. Louisiana High Sch. Athletic Ass'n. (Need to show substantial limitations in a major life activity). On the other side of the ledger are two new decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

In Neely v. PSEG Texas, Ltd. P'ship, 735 F.3d 242, an employee sued under the ADAAA claiming he was disabled because he suffered from major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. At trial, the central issue was the wording of two jury interrogatories, both of which asked if the plaintiff was "a qualified individual with a disability." The employee claimed that the inclusion of the words "with a disability" was contrary to the requirements of the ADAAA, contending that the ADAAA had replaced the phrase "qualified individual with a disability because of the disability of such individual" with "qualified individual on the basis of disability" to define an appropriate Plaintiff under the statute. The Fifth Circuit rejected this argument, stating that while the ADAAA had broadened the definition of disability, it had not eliminated the term or the need for a plaintiff to prove the existence of a disability.

In Mann v. Louisiana High Sch. Athletic Ass'n, 535 Fed. Appx. 405, a high school football player sought an injunction to allow him to play in the upcoming season, which had been blocked by a determination that he was subject to a "transfer rule" rendering him ineligible to play for one year following his transfer from one school to another within the same district. The student claimed that his transfer was a result of his anxiety disorder disability, which should excuse him from coverage under the transfer rule. He thus contended that the failure to excuse him from the transfer rule violated the ADAAA.

The trial court enjoined the Athletic Association from enforcing the transfer rule, holding that enforcing the rule in this situation violated the ADAAA. The Fifth Circuit reversed, determining that while the ADAAA lowered the standard required to show existence of a disability, it did not eliminate the obligation of a plaintiff to demonstrate substantial limitation in a major life activity. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of impairment, standing alone, did not make him disabled for statutory purposes because he conceded he was able-bodied sufficiently to play football.

Written by:

Jackson Walker
Contact
more
less

Jackson Walker on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.