Illinois Appellate Court Decision Clarifies Waiver Of The FOIA Predecisional Materials Exemption

by Franczek Radelet P.C.

The Appellate Court of Illinois (First District) recently issued an opinion clarifying how a public body can waive the Freedom of Information Act protection for predecisional records. In Dumke v. Chicago, the court held that then-Mayor Richard Daley’s repeated references to a consultant’s report were sufficient to waive the exemption in response to a FOIA request issued to the Chicago Police Department, even though the Mayor is not technically the “head of” the Police Department.

In Dumke, a citizen made a FOIA request to the Chicago Police Department for a copy of a final report of a study conducted by consultants for the City of Chicago regarding Police Department operations. The Police Department denied the FOIA request, asserting first that the record was exempt under Section 7(1)(f) of the FOIA, which exempts from disclosure “[p]reliminary drafts, notes, recommendations, memoranda and other records in which opinions are expressed, or policies or actions are formulated, except [when a] record is publicly cited and identified by the head of the public body.” 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(f). The FOIA defines “head of the public body” to mean “the president, mayor, chairman, presiding officer, director, superintendent, manager, supervisor or individual otherwise holding primary executive and administrative authority for the public body, or such person’s duly authorized agent.” 5 ILCS 140/2(e).

Although the Mayor had cited the report publicly, the Police Department maintained that the Mayor was not the “head of the public body” and so his citation to the report could not waive the exemption for predecisional records. In the alternative, the City argued that the citations by the Mayor were not sufficient to waive the privilege. The Illinois Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor and a state trial court agreed with the Police Department.

On appeal, however, the Illinois Appellate Court reversed and found in favor of the requester. First, the court found that the Mayor was a “head of the public body,” even though the definition of that term suggests that the Superintendent of the Police Department would be the Police Department’s head. Although the Court’s reasoning is not completely clear, it appears to be based on the fact that the Mayor is also the head of the City, and that the Police Department is a subsidiary of the City. It is unclear whether the court’s reasoning would apply in other situations. For instance, it is unclear whether it would apply where the head of one public body cites a report, but a FOIA request is issued to a second, unrelated public body. For example, if two school districts work together on a project and obtain a report from a consultant, and the superintendent of District 1 cites the report publicly, is the exemption waived with respect to a FOIA request to District 2?

Second, the court found that the Mayor’s citations to the report were sufficient to waive the protections for predecisional materials under Section 7(1)(f). The court pointed to the fact that the Mayor repeatedly referred to the report in a press conference, identifying the nature of the report and its purpose, identifying and indeed personally thanking the key players behind and authors of the report, and citing the report as support for the police reorganization plan he was announcing at the press conference. In arriving at its decision, the court also found persuasive that the press conference was later posted on the Mayor’s YouTube channel and that a press release was issued with many of the same details as provided in the press conference. The court distinguished an earlier Appellate Court case, Harwood v. McDonough, in which a public body was allowed to withhold a consultant’s report even though the Governor had previously cited to an executive summary of the report and to charts recapitulating the information contained in the executive summary. The court noted that in Harwood, unlike in the Dumke case, the head of the public body never cited or identified publicly the report, rather citing only to the executive summary of the report.

The court’s decision in Dumke is an important reminder to public bodies to think carefully about what records high-level officials in the public body publicly identify or cite. If a high-level official from a public body, or its subsidiary or parent entity, wishes to cite publicly to information from the record, the public body should create an executive summary and explicitly label it “Executive Summary,” and only allow citations to that summary, not the underlying record. The executive summary should include information that the public body is willing to release to the public. If the executive summary includes data or other information from the report, the public body should paraphrase language and summarize data from the underlying record.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Franczek Radelet P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Franczek Radelet P.C.

Franczek Radelet P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.