In Case You Missed It - Interesting Items for Corporate Counsel - August 2017

by Stoel Rives LLP

Stoel Rives LLP

  1. A review of 2017 proxy season activity, including the trend toward adoptions of proxy access bylaws, is here. A suggestion that the big news of the 2017 proxy season was climate change proposals and the shift in Blackrock, Vanguard and Fidelity voting policies to generally support them, is here (although if you’re not an oil company, you might not have much to worry about – yet).
  2. 2017 proxy results also suggest that things may get rougher for public company directors and public companies:
    • Investors seem more willing to express disappointment with directors, see here.
    • Shareholder activism is becoming the “new normal,” according to a JP Morgan report here (summary here). (But see here for a suggestion that the SEC may try to stanch the flow of shareholder proposals.)
    • Evidence that some passive investors rely solely on ISS voting recommendations, making ISS’s often opaque considerations even more frustrating, is here.
  3. Although it seems like proxy season just ended (and it did), it’s never too early to start thinking about next year. Apparently. We are here to help. ISS opened its 2018 Governance Principles Survey, here. The survey solicits views on:
    • dual class structures,
    • director gender diversity,
    • share repurchases for cross-market companies (where the home jurisdiction requires a shareholder vote),
    • virtual shareholder meetings, and
    • issuer views on how pay-ratio data should be analyzed and used by shareholders.
    For good or ill, ISS strives to remain relevant and it really can only do that if it changes things up once in a while, even though presumably “good” corporate governance principles haven’t changed in centuries. To the extent there are tea leaves to read, the ISS survey may set the stage for changes to its voting policies or governance ratings scores in the areas listed above.
  4. Proxy access” will likely remain a trend in shareholder proposals. The Council for Institutional Investors released, here, its updated views on proxy access best practices, including a chart that shows where its recommendations differ from what has seemingly become “the norm”: 3% of a company’s outstanding shares held by no more than 20 shareholders for three years may nominate up to 20% of the directors. In 2017, activists proposed to “fix” proxy access bylaw provisions, and the SEC said that a company could not exclude some of the fixes on the basis that they were “substantially implemented.” See here and here. Keep in mind, of course, that although proxy access remains a focus of shareholder activists, most of these hair-splitting proxy access “fix it” proposals fail.
  5. As an example of the growing disdain for dual class stock (see Item 1 above, if you believe in tea leaves), S&P and FTSE Russell announced they would exclude new dual class stock companies from their indices. See here. (How does that make you feel if you’re an index fund investor and the policy removes the hot stock from your portfolio?) Some commentators are lauding the holding in CalPERS v. IAC, discussed here, in which Delaware’s Chancery Court held that IAC directors had breached their fiduciary duties by approving the creation and issuance of new non-voting stock to preserve the IAC Chairman’s control of the company (a la Google, sort of, here).
  6. Recall that beginning in September public registrants must hyperlink to each exhibit listed in the exhibit index, including each exhibit incorporated by reference. The update to the SEC’s EDGAR manual is here.
  7. The Center for Audit Quality asks, here, that its members focus on the adequacy of management’s disclosures about the potential effects of accounting principle changes.
  8. Finally, a brief foray into M&A, sort of:
    • Delaware reminds us in The Mrs. Fields Brand v. Interbake Foods, here, that “material adverse effect” means the same thing in a commercial contract that it means in the M&A context, developed most significantly in IBP, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, i.e. for a change to be material and adverse it must (a) be unexpected, (b) substantially threaten the earnings potential of the target, and (c) last a long time (but maybe not as long as in an M&A context). Perhaps even more significantly, the case introduced us to the concept of “cookie confusion,” which certainly sounds like a problem with potential widespread effect.
    • In DFC Global v. Muirfield Value Partners, here, Delaware Chief Justice Strine opined that, although he was not willing to accept a presumption that the deal price is the fair value of shares, if the sales process was robust a judge better have a darn good reason for deviating from that value. The lack of such a presumption may not be all bad for acquirers – the Delaware Chancery Court also recently ruled that a company’s fair value was less than half of the acquisition value, here.
    • In Chicago Bridge v. Westinghouse, here, the Delaware Supreme Court (Strine again!) held that a purchase price adjustment provision, in the context of the entire purchase agreement and based on the language of the provision, only allowed a plaintiff to recover for changes to a seller’s business between signing and closing, and the fact that components of the seller’s working capital calculation did not comply with GAAP was not a separate basis for a claim. At issue in the case was a potential $2.5 billion swing in the purchase price. Yikes.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stoel Rives LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Stoel Rives LLP

Stoel Rives LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.