Insider Trading - Will The U.S. Supreme Court Roll Back Newman?

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
Contact

On Wednesday, Oct. 5, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Salman v. United States—a case that could significantly impact the current status of insider trading law.

The case centers on a Chicago grocery wholesaler, Bassam Salman, who was convicted of insider trading for receiving second-hand stock tips from a family member. Salman’s brother-in-law, Maher Kara, was an investment banker at Citigroup. Maher passed stock tips to his older brother Mounir (“Michael”) Kara, who ran a hazardous waste business in Chicago and Michael in turn passed these tips on to Salman. Salman was convicted of making $2.1 million on Kara’s tips (which he deposited into a joint account with his wife’s sister and her husband).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
Contact
more
less

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide