Introducing Evidence Before Authorization May Result in Expungement

Jones Day
Contact

Jones Day

Introducing evidence in a motion to file a reply to a patent owner’s preliminary response without the PTAB’s authorization may result in denial and expungement. A recent motion met such a fate in Ice Castles, LLC v. Youngstrom, IPR2021-01179, Paper 8 (PTAB Oct. 26, 2021).

In the case, the Patent Owner challenged one of the Petitioner’s asserted references as not qualifying as prior art in its preliminary response. Accordingly, the Petitioner moved for authorization to file a reply that would introduce several archived webpages to dispute the Patent Owner’s challenge. In its motion, the Petitioner included exhibits of the proposed webpages it was seeking authorization to introduce. The inclusion of these exhibits was made without contacting either the PTAB or the Patent Owner. As a result, the PTAB denied and expunged the Petitioner’s motion.

In its decision, the PTAB cited its rules that “[a] petitioner may seek leave to file a reply to the preliminary response” and that “[a]ny such request must make a showing of good cause.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.108(c). The PTAB went on to explain that unless pre-authorized, the manner for seeking authorization to file a paper is to contact both the opposing party and the PTAB to arrange for a conference call for authorization. Consolidated Trial Practice Guide at 51-52 (Nov. 2019). Should a patent owner oppose the request, patent owners should be prepared to explain why denying authorization would be consistent with Hulu, LLC v. Sound View Innovations, LLC, IPR2018-01039, Paper 29 (PTAB Dec. 20, 2019).

The Petitioner violated the rules by attaching exhibits of new evidence in its motion for authorization to file a reply without contacting either the PTAB or the Patent Owner beforehand. The PTAB viewed this “self-help strategy” as frustrating its ability to manage the record of the proceeding, and therefore expunged the motion and exhibits.

Takeaway

When seeking permission to include new evidence in a reply to a preliminary response at the PTAB, make sure the “cart” of evidence follows (and is separate from) the authorization request “horse.”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Jones Day

Written by:

Jones Day
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Jones Day on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide