Is There Securities Fraud Without Reliance And Causation?

Allen Matkins
Contact

Allen Matkins

Section 25401 of the Corporations Code is California's securities fraud statute.  Readers of this space will know that that scienter was not required under the former version of the statute but that the legislature rewrote Section 25401 to conform to federal Rule 10b-5 which does require scienter. At the time, I pointed out that the legislature had likely made it tougher for plaintiffs to plead and prove securities claims.  See California Creates Complete Chaos By Rewriting Anti-Fraud Statute, But “We Are Against Fraud Aren’t We?”.  Then in 2015, the legislature returned to the former language of Section 25401 (effective January 1, 2016).

In a recent appeal, a criminal defendant argued that this legislative seesaw evidenced an attempt to write requirements of reliance and causation into Section 25401.  People v. Lester, Case No. C083333 (July 20, 2019).  The Court of Appeal found this argument bootless:

"This argument fails to persuade. Nothing in the legislative history of section 25401 supports this argument. There is no mention of adding the elements of reliance and causation to an action under section 25401. To accept Lester's argument, we would have to find that the Legislature intended a significant change in the elements of the offense from existing caselaw (Bowden [v. Robinson, 67 Cal. App. 3d 705 (1977)] and [People v.] Baumgart [218 Cal. App. 3d 1207 (1990) without so much as a mention of the change in either the legislative history or the language of the statute. Lester offers no authority to show that reliance or causation have ever been elements of a violation of section 25401."

The case is an unpublished decision and under Rule 8.1115 of the California Rules of Court may not be cited or relied upon except as permitted by that rule.

Note to readers: Yesterday's post included an embarrassing misspelling of "initialism" as "initialization".  Initialization refers to putting something in the start or initial position.  An initialism, as described in the post, is an abbreviation based on the first or initial letters of a word.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide