Judicial Word Games and Hypertechnicalities

Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C.
Contact

This article confronts what I consider to be a disturbing trend in how Missouri appellate courts are applying Supreme Court Rule 84.04(d). I approach any criticism of this entrenched rule with some caution. Still, as a retired lawyer on inactive status, I no longer feel constrained in how my opinion on this topic might affect clients with pending appeals. This is a fuller version on an abridged article published in the November issue of Missouri Lawyers Media. I have been given permission to post this longer article here.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide