Maritime Cybersecurity Regulation on the Horizon

King & Spalding

Over the past year, various institutions and organizations—both domestic and international—have shown an interest in moving the increasingly prevalent cybersecurity conversation offshore. Domestically, both Congress and federal agencies have pushed to mandate cybersecurity measures for ships, ports, terminals, and offshore facilities. Internationally, a United Nations agency has issued new guidelines designed to enhance cybersecurity in worldwide shipping operations. 

Even experienced energy companies may overlook this confluence of interest in maritime cybersecurity and its implications. Critical energy infrastructure has long been at the forefront of cybersecurity, both because it is a frequent target of cyberattacks and because the potentially debilitating effects of a successful attack. However, maritime cybersecurity regulations will not necessarily target just the energy industry and are likely to come from a variety of sources, some of which may be unfamiliar to industry players. As we head into 2017, we encourage members of the energy industry to recognize and prepare for maritime cybersecurity regulation that is unquestionably on the horizon domestically and internationally.


In the modern digital age, nearly every industry relies on various computer systems to support operations. Maritime operations are no exception. Ships, ports, terminals, and offshore facilities often rely on Internet-connected operational and information technologies for communication, navigation, logistics, safety monitoring, security, and operation of machinery, among other things. Moreover, in the very near future we are likely to see an increasing number of interconnected, autonomous machines that communicate directly with one another. While these technological advances can enhance the efficiency, safety, and effectiveness of maritime operations, they also expose companies to significant risks in the form of cyberattacks. 

Virtually all computer systems are at risk of cyberattacks. Much of the new connectivity in maritime operations is achieved by integrating widely-used commercial platforms, which are well understood by hackers, with aging industrial control systems. Successful attacks on operational technology, such as industrial control systems, can have huge consequences, both in terms of the impact to ongoing operations and in terms of business and legal exposure for harm to health, safety, or the environment. This category of attack is also most likely to attract intense government scrutiny of the company’s operations. Most cyberattacks, however, seek to steal information, not cause physical damage. Information technology—corporate systems—offer hackers a wealth of sensitive data to target, including things like production and processing techniques or strategies for negotiating with governments and trading partners.

Despite a strong national interest in regulating the cybersecurity of critical energy infrastructure, the industry’s maritime operations have largely gone under the radar. To date, approaches to cybersecurity in the energy industry’s maritime operations have largely been voluntary, and thus company- or even vessel-specific. At the same time, global economic growth and the corresponding increase in energy demand have led many energy companies to explore offshore options for replenishing reserves and meeting production needs. Oil and gas producers, in particular, have shown a steadily rising interest in maritime technologies, such as floating production storage and offloading vessels and floating liquefied natural gas operations, that can both meet energy demand and align companies with global efforts to reduce emissions. But the rapid adoption of new operational technologies and an increased dependence on networked cyber structures opens the possibility of cyberattacks that could threaten the economy, worker safety, the environment, or national security.

In 2016, a number of domestic and international institutions or organizations have promoted the development of cybersecurity measures that would prevent potential disruptions to maritime operations caused by hacking, malware, or other cyber-related risks. As this article will detail, the proposed measures are not specific to the energy industry—they apply equally to other sectors with maritime operations, including shipping, port and terminal operations, and other maritime services. Because of their diffusion across a number of institutions and their broad applicability, these indicators of impending maritime cybersecurity regulation may not be immediately apparent to energy industry players. But they are of special importance to energy industry participants with significant offshore operations. In preparing for 2017, all eyes should be on maritime cybersecurity as the next horizon for an industry that has always been at the forefront of cybersecurity regulation. 

Cybersecurity in the Energy Industry

Energy was the second-most likely industry to be targeted by cyberattacks in 2015, and it led that category the year before.[1] Attackers have demonstrated an intent to do everything from engaging in industrial espionage to taking control of operational equipment. At least in a dozen public incidents in the last decade, foreign hackers have gained remote access to U.S. energy facilities and stolen sensitive information, such as passwords or engineering schematics.[2] Power plants, offshore facilities, pipelines, and dams are all prime targets.

Compounding the problem, energy facilities are frequently operated by outdated industrial control systems that have been rendered vulnerable to cyberattacks as a result of bringing these systems “online.” For example, former and current U.S. officials disclosed earlier this year that a dam outside of New York City was infiltrated by Iranian hackers in 2013, providing the hackers access to the industrial control systems operating the facility. Attackers with access to industrial control systems may be able to manipulate the physical operations at a facility, potentially causing physical damage, employee injury, or environmental harm. According to researchers, the U.S. has more industrial-control systems connected to the Internet—over 57,000—than any other country in the world.

Because of the particular vulnerability of networked energy infrastructure, as well as the potentially debilitating effects of a successful cyberattack, regulatory agencies have moved quickly to issue standards or offer guidance. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) was one of the first agencies in any industry to adopt cybersecurity regulations. It has adopted eleven critical infrastructure protection standards for the U.S. power grid that require cybersecurity measures, approving version 6 of these standards in January 2016.[3] The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has also promulgated mandatory cybersecurity regulations and has issued guidance on best practices for compliance.[4] Meanwhile, the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) have promulgated non-binding guidance addressing cybersecurity of the electricity subsector, oil and gas subsectors, and pipeline security.[5]

As a new year begins, the energy industry is now facing the prospect of new regulatory oversight of its cybersecurity efforts in maritime operations. The past year revealed a series of indicators that maritime cybersecurity regulation is imminent. Six months ago, the United Nations (UN) International Maritime Organization (IMO) published Interim Guidelines on Maritime Cyber Risk Management (“Interim Guidelines”),[6] which were drafted with input from representatives of 44 Member States, including the United States Coast Guard (USCG). Six months before that, the U.S. House of Representatives sent a bill to the Senate that would require USCG to enforce cybersecurity standards at U.S. ports and in maritime operations. Meanwhile, the two federal agencies with primary jurisdiction over industrial maritime operations—USCG and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE)—have been speaking out publicly about the need for regulatory involvement in maritime cybersecurity.[7] In 2017, we expect maritime operations will emerge as the next frontier of cybersecurity regulation affecting in the energy industry. 

IMO Interim Guidelines

The Interim Guidelines were approved at a June 1, 2016 meeting of the IMO Maritime Safety Committee (MSC). The IMO is a specialized agency of the UN tasked with creating a regulatory framework to ensure the safety, security and environmental performance of international shipping. The MSC is a central part of the IMO dealing with all maritime safety and security issues.[8] The Guidelines are the product of an MSC working group that included the USCG and representatives from 43 other countries.[9] The Interim Guidelines provide high-level recommendations regarding protection against current and emerging cyber threats and vulnerabilities for all participants in international shipping. The Interim Guidelines currently are non-binding, although their mere existence may inform legal standards of care and may affect the approach of domestic regulators on this issue. Moreover, the MSC considered promulgating mandatory guidelines at its most recent meeting in late November of 2016, electing instead to wait for a committee to complete further study on facilitation issues.

The Interim Guidelines’ operational risk management approach closely maps the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (“Framework”).[10] The Framework, a collaborative effort among a wide group of government and industry experts, has proven particularly influential in just a short period of time. Developed pursuant to Executive Order 13636 and released in 2014, the Framework was a source of inspiration for, among other things, FERC’s recent CIPs. Even though drafted specifically for critical infrastructure, it has been adapted by numerous regulators outside of the energy arena—including the FCC, FDA, and NHTSA—as well as by private companies to fit the unique risks of their particular industries.[11]

The resemblance between the Interim Guidelines and the NIST Framework is particularly evident where the Interim Guidelines employ the Framework’s now-familiar, five-element cycle of cybersecurity practices:

  1. Identify:  Define personnel roles and responsibilities for cyber risk management and identify the systems, assets, data and capabilities that, when disrupted, pose risks to ship operations.
  2. Protect:  Implement risk control processes and measures, and contingency planning to protect against a cyber event and ensure continuity of shipping operations.
  3. Detect:  Develop and implement activities necessary to detect a cyber event in a timely manner.
  4. Respond:  Develop and implement activities and plans to provide resilience and to restore systems necessary for shipping operations or services impaired due to a cyberevent.
  5. Recover:  Identify measures to back-up and restore cyber systems necessary for shipping operations impacted by a cyberevent.[12]

It is no surprise that the Interim Guidelines would draw upon the Framework’s model. The Framework coalesces the best of existing cybersecurity standards and practices into flexible risk-based guidelines, which mirrors the IMO’s goal with the Interim Guidelines.

House Bill 3878

While the IMO Interim Guidelines are the most recent indicia of regulatory interest in maritime cybersecurity, they are certainly not the only one. 2016 opened on the heels of the U.S. House of Representatives passing H.R. 3878, the Strengthening Cybersecurity Information Sharing and Coordination in Our Ports Act of 2015, in late December 2015. House Bill 3878 would have been Congress’s first statutory mandate for cybersecurity regulation in maritime operations. The House’s primary focus was the security of ports, but the bill’s requirements would have extended to upstream energy facilities, such as oil rigs, natural gas platforms, and mobile offshore drilling units. Although the congressional session expired with the bill still in the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the bill’s sponsor and two of its three co-sponsors have returned to Congress.

The real significance of House Bill 3878 to the energy industry comes from the combination of the bill’s two primary components and what it reveals about the future of maritime cybersecurity regulation. First, the House bill tasks the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with developing a maritime cybersecurity risk assessment model and guidelines for incident reporting. Although the finer details of the risk assessment model would be left up to DHS, the bill requires that the model be “consistent” with the NIST Framework. Like the IMO Interim Guidelines, House Bill 3878 reflects the continuing influence of the NIST Framework in the development of cybersecurity measures. House Bill 3878 also requires DHS to “establish guidelines for voluntary reporting of maritime-related cybersecurity risks and incidents” to the National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center, as well as to appropriate federal agencies. It instructs DHS to “seek to ensure participation of at least one information sharing and analysis organization . . . . representing the maritime community.” Currently, the collection, analysis, storage, and transmission of maritime threat and incident data is served by the Maritime Information Sharing and Analysis Center (Maritime ISAC), a member of the National Council of ISACs.[13]

The second primary component of House Bill 3878 is an amendment to the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA). Under the MTSA, the USCG is currently tasked with preventing maritime “transportation security incidents,” defined as incidents “resulting in a significant loss of life, environmental damage, transportation system disruption, or economic disruption in a particular area.”[14] To achieve this objective, the MTSA requires vessel and facility operators to prepare and submit vulnerability assessments and security plans aimed at deterring transportation security incidents to the “maximum extent practicable.”[15] House Bill 3878 would revise the relevant provisions of the MTSA to require that USCG-enforced vulnerability assessments and security plans include the “prevention, management, and response to cybersecurity risks.”

Agency Interest in Maritime Cybersecurity

Even in the absence of legislative action, the energy industry should prepare for USCG to begin incorporating cybersecurity risks into its enforcement of the MTSA. Although the MTSA does not contain any explicit cybersecurity requirements (nor do any of the thirteen major regulations predicated upon it), USCG and DHS have been exploring avenues for regulating cybersecurity under the MTSA’s existing language. In August of 2016, USCG released a paper titled “Cyber Risks in the Marine Transportation System,” which explained USCG’s risk-based approach to cybersecurity in the marine environment. Notably, the paper stated that organizations need to incorporate their cyber procedures into MTSA-required security plans.[16] This is consistent with USCG’s June 2015 “Cyber Strategy” report that identified USCG’s intent to incorporate cybersecurity risk information into existing vessel and facility security assessments at an unspecified future time.[17] The paper also stated that existing MTSA notification requirements extend to reportable incidents “with a cyber nexus.” Along the same lines, USCG and DHS sought public comment in 2014 and 2015 on the development of maritime cybersecurity standards consistent with the five core functions of the NIST Framework: identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover.[18] The focus of these standards was on the vulnerability of facility industrial control systems and the possibility of physical damage resulting from a cyberattack. Thus, House Bill 3878 appears to have been an attempt to codify cybersecurity enforcement efforts that were already underway within USCG.

Like USCG, BSEE has indicated an interest in regulating maritime cybersecurity even in the absence of a specific statutory mandate. Under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), BSEE has jurisdiction over the safety of offshore oil and gas exploration and production, which includes permitting, conducting inspections and investigations, enforcing regulatory requirements, and overseeing oil spill response planning and preparedness. Due to their overlapping jurisdiction, BSEE and USCG operate under a Memorandum of Understanding and various Memorandums of Agreement concerning the regulatory supervision of offshore oil and gas facilities.[19] Under the agreements, BSEE is the lead regulatory agency for fixed and floating outer continental shelf facilities, as well as mobile offshore drilling units while attached to the seabed. Where applicable, BSEE and the Coast Guard conduct joint inspections evaluating both agencies’ regulations.

BSEE has not yet promulgated any regulations that specifically address cybersecurity. However, it has indicated an interest in regulating cybersecurity even in the absence of a specific statutory mandate to do so. It appears possible that BSEE could chose to interpret its current authority to include cybersecurity. Specifically, BSEE’s current regulations require companies to utilize the “best available and safest technology” in oil and gas exploration, development, and production.[20] This standard could be read to require that offshore facilities have adequate cybersecurity measures in place. At a recent conference on offshore technology, BSEE Director Brian Salerno, sharing a stage with Rear Adm. Paul Thomas, Assistant Commandant for U.S. Coast Guard Prevention Policy, publicly acknowledged the agency’s concern with the cyber-vulnerability of the offshore oil and gas industry. The BSEE director said that “regulatory consistency on the part of the BSEE and the Coast Guard” would be necessary to promote a broader safety culture that includes operators, contractors, suppliers, vendors, and all of the various parts of the offshore oil and gas community. BSEE and the Coast Guard have been collaborating regarding possible approaches to maritime cybersecurity risk management, after making similar public statements in 2015.[21] Cybersecurity regulation by BSEE would likely involve more direct supervision of upstream energy operations than the USCG regime, which principally relies on vessel and facility operators to perform self-assessments. 

In April of 2016, BSEE also issued a final rule on Blowout Prevention and Well Control (“Well Control Rule”).[22] The Well Control Rule was a response to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon incident. It establishes requirements related to blowout preventers on oil and gas wells, with implementation staged over several years. Notably, the Well Control Rule also includes a provision requiring real-time monitoring capability for deepwater, high-temperature, or high-pressure drilling activities. The rule requires using an independent, automatic, and continuous monitoring system capable of recording, storing, and transmitting data regarding certain operational systems.[23] The real-time monitoring requirement arguably exposes companies engaged in drilling activities to additional cybersecurity risks, for example by prohibiting “air gapped” operational technology as a cybersecurity measure. BSEE acknowledged this risk in the notice-and-comment process, but concluded that the oil and gas industry already should have effective cybersecurity measures available.[24] On the one hand, if BSEE begins regulating maritime cybersecurity, as predicted, the agency may face criticism for the trade-off reflected in this conclusion. On the other hand, the conclusion underscores BSEE’s position that maritime cybersecurity measures are already needed and expected. The Well Control Rule’s real-time monitoring requirement may also provide BSEE with an added hook to justify regulating maritime cybersecurity under the existing “safest and best technology” standard.   

Consequences of Cybersecurity Regulation

The increased attention to maritime cyber risks raises a number of legal issues for companies involved in offshore energy production. To start, both USCG and BSEE have the authority to issue civil fines for regulatory violations. BSEE has authority under OCSLA to assess civil penalties of up to $40,000 per day.[25] Violations could even potentially result in criminal liability exposure if the agency were to determine that a violation was knowing and willful. Violations of the MTSA are subject to a penalty of $25,000 per violation.[26] Increased regulation also places a burden on businesses to be prepared to responding to government investigations or requests for information. In this context, regulatory compliance could prove particularly challenging because facilities’ industrial control systems can be highly individualized, meaning companies’ approaches to cybersecurity may vary tremendously.

Furthermore, cybersecurity regulation by USCG or BSEE and the issuance of Interim Guidelines by IMO can inform the standard of care applied in any civil lawsuits that follow a maritime cyber incident. A successful cyberattack on offshore oil and gas facilities involves more than financial impacts and reputational effects; it can potentially result in property and environmental damage, physical injuries, and even death. In such cases, state law negligence or wrongful death actions are to be expected, as are shareholder derivative lawsuits. Industry standards and regulations—even voluntary standards such as the NIST Framework—are commonly used to establish a baseline of reasonableness against which a company’s actions will be measured. For that reason, is worth noting how industry organizations such as the Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF)—which represents 105 oil companies internationally and consults with the IMO—have made maritime cybersecurity a priority heading into the new year. 


As these coalescing efforts evidence, maritime operations loom as the next frontier of cybersecurity regulation for the energy industry. As the IMO Interim Guidelines and House Bill 3878 demonstrate, the NIST Framework is likely to remain influential in the development of maritime cybersecurity standards. Meanwhile, the interest in direct regulation and enforcement by USCG and BSEE shows how maritime cybersecurity vulnerability is coming to be understood as not just a matter of business operations, but also as a threat to the national economy, the environment, and human life. Energy industry participants, in particular, should stay abreast of these developments and consult with experienced counsel regarding both participation in public policy and compliance with the present and anticipated maritime cybersecurity regulation regime. We also encourage companies in the industry to consider a number of steps outlined here to facilitate risk reduction efforts for their business:

  1. Conduct cybersecurity training for employees;
  2. Coordinate with legal and human resource departments regarding regulatory compliance;
  3. Upgrade outdated IT products vulnerable software;
  4. Improve the physical security of IT, such as data rooms and cabinets;
  5. Upgrade outdated and aging control systems in facilities;
  6. Separate data networks, especially between on- and offshore facilities;
  7. Seek out vendors, suppliers and contractors who promote a cybersecurity culture;
  8. Consider ways of contracting around third-party cyber vulnerabilities;
  9. Consider specific risk mitigation measures, such as the U.S. Safety Act;
  10. Organize legal work streams and emergency response coordination in advance of cyber incidents.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding

King & Spalding on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.