Military Members: A Silent Protest?

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
Contact

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Recent national events have created a potentially confusing situation for members of the United States military. There is no confusion that soldiers, sailors and airmen are afforded the same constitutional rights as their fellow citizens (including freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment). However, it becomes a bit murkier as to whether a service member’s freedom of speech is unfettered. It also could be more nuanced if the military member is part of the reserves or National Guard and does not consider him/herself to be “in status” when participating in such activity.

As a rule, the military must remain politically neutral and devoid of any political activity that may appear to favor certain political parties or ideals. The following are some reminders and guidelines to assist military members to better understand what they are permitted to say and do versus what could get them into trouble.

First, every member should become familiar with his/her branch’s standards of conduct. Many times, those instructions can be illustrative and answer an individual’s questions. Second, without prior approval from the military, no military member is permitted to be in uniform while furthering political causes or participating in certain unsanctioned activities, including but not limited to, speeches, interviews, marches, rallies or protests. This helps avoid any implication that the military has sanctioned the underlying cause. Again, unless prior approval is received or the individual is attending an event sanctioned by the military, members of the military must maintain political neutrality while in uniform.

While off duty, military members who are not in uniform are permitted to attend peaceful protest events. Members of the military are also free to sign petitions and wear clothing and display signs showing messages of solidarity and peaceful protest. However, members of the military should cease participation in any event where there is a threat of personal injury, illegal activity, property damage or confrontation with police or the National Guard.

And, to the extent that a service member elects to author an article or op-ed piece, he or she should omit a military rank in the “byline” and include a non-attribution clause that reminds the reader the views are those of the author and may not be the views of the military or the Department of Defense.

Should any member of the U.S. military have questions regarding the intersection of their constitutional rights and their duties and responsibilities as service members, they should consult their JAG, military defense counsel or an attorney specializing in military law.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
Contact
more
less

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.