New Insurance Law in Chile

by Cozen O'Connor
Contact

Chile’s new insurance law came in to force on 1 December 2013. The new rules amend the Chilean Code of Commerce, including rules deriving from the 1865 Civil Code. We have summarised some of the features of the new law.

The changes to the code form part of a package of revisions to Chilean insurance and reinsurance law. New claims adjustment rules also came into force in 2013.

Recognition of Modern Classes of Cover

The old law formally recognised only the concept of insurance over cosas (goods or objects), although in practice, a broader range of coverage has been available for many years. The new law expressly recognises that insurance can cover a wide range of risks and addresses some specific concepts, including insurance for civil liability, loss of profits, credit, life, health, and reinsurance.

Civil Liability Insurance

The concept of civil liability insurance is set out in the new article 570 of the Chilean Code of Commerce (the new law). Unsurprisingly, the new law confirms that civil liability insurance concerns the insurer’s obligation to indemnify the insured for loss and damage caused to third parties.

Article 574 forbids the insured from accepting or settling a third-party claim without the insurer’s approval. Breach of this obligation exempts the insurer from the obligation to indemnify.

What is surprising is that the new law seems to envisage a form of direct relationship between the insurer and the third party. Article 513 introduces the concept of a “Beneficiary” defined as: “the subject who, without being insured, is entitled to indemnity if an accident occurs.” Article 570 provides that:

In civil liability insurance, the insurer will pay the indemnity to the third party damages by virtue of a definitive judgment or an out-of-court settlement concluded by the insured with its consent.

Historically, third parties had no direct cause of action against insurers. Although the new position is unclear, it is possible that third parties may now try to argue that they can directly sue civil liability insurers.

Some jurisdictions do allow third parties to pursue insurers directly, in limited circumstances. For example, the English Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 will (when in force) allow an injured third party to claim against an insurer, where the insured has become insolvent. The new Chilean rules seem to go further than that, in that an insolvency event is not stated to be a prerequisite to the right of action.

Proof of Insurance

The new law states that an insurance contract is consensual, that is to say, it exists as soon as there is an oral agreement between the insurer and the insured. The contract’s existence and terms may be proved by “all legal means,” provided that the agreement is recorded, either on paper or electronically.

Limitation Period

The new law has reduced the standard limitation period for claiming against insurers to four years. Time runs from the point at which the claim becomes actionable against the insurer. The running of time against the insured is interrupted when it reports the incident to the insurer. Time recommences running when the insurer advises of its decision.

The statute of limitations period may not be reduced by agreement between the parties.

The limitation period regarding claims under civil liability policies cannot be less than the period in which an injured third party has to claim against the insured.

Two or More Causes of Loss

The new law states: “if the accident originated owing to various causes, the insurer will answer for the loss if any of the causes reflects a risk covered by the policy ….”

A similar principle applies in English law: where there are two proximate causes, one of which is covered, and one of which is not, the insured can recover on the basis that one of the causes was an insured peril (The Miss Jay Jay). On the other hand, if there are two proximate causes, one of which is covered, and one of which is specifically excluded, the insured cannot recover (Wayne Tank and Pump v Employers’ Liability Assurance). The new Chilean rules have not specifically addressed this latter question.

Extension of Meaning of “Marine Insurance”

Marine insurance is now deemed to include: “installations and machinery geared to perform loading, unloading, stowage and the care of ships and any other property that the parties believe is exposed to risks associated with the sea.”

Traditionally, only cargo insurance, hull and machinery, loss of hire, and owner’s/carriers’ liability insurances were considered to be marine insurance and therefore subject to average. Now that the definition has been expanded, it would seem to follow that the new categories of marine insurance should also be subject to average, although it is not clear if the draftsman intended this.

Dispute Resolution

Under the new law, disputes between the insured, or beneficiary, and the insurer “will be resolved by an arbitrating referee, nominated by mutual accord by the parties when the dispute arises.” If the parties cannot agree to a referee, the court will nominate a referee who will then “have the powers of an arbitrator,” and who should “pronounce a verdict according to the law.” In cases of very low quantum, an insured may still elect to sue via the court.

Such arbitrators can consider “any” categories of evidence and can decide “in any phase of the proceedings, the means of gathering evidence it feels are appropriate, summoning the parties.” Arbitrators’ powers as to the collection of evidence are therefore very broad indeed.

The change to mandatory arbitration should lead to the creation of a corpus of  specialist insurance arbitrators.

Claim Notification

The new law provides that, in the context of liability policies, the insured should inform the insurer “in reasonable time” of any fact or circumstance that could lead to a claim against it. The consequence of late notification is not spelled out in the new law. Also the provision deals only with liability insurance. (In first party policies, the policies often contain express time periods for notification.)

Reinsurance

The new law contains a general definition of reinsurance and contains a number of particular provisions as to its operation. The general definition states:

the reinsurer is obliged to indemnify the reinsured, within the limits and forms fixed in the contract, for the liabilities that affect its wealth and capital as a result of the obligations into which it entered into one or more contracts of insurance or reinsurance.

Interestingly, it is also stated that: “international standard practices and customs over reinsurance will serve to interpret the parties’ will.” This provision might be welcomed by international reinsurers who so far have had to operate in something of a legal vacuum regarding reinsurance law in Chile. On the other hand, this provision also gives rise to uncertainty because it is questionable if there is such a thing as “international standard practice” at all. Furthermore it is not clear what will occur where a relevant international standard practice comes into conflict with substantive provisions of Chilean law.

It will be interesting to see if tribunals will de facto adopt principles of English law, by dint of reference to London market practices. That would seem to be appropriate where such reinsurances are negotiated and placed in the London market, but are subject to Chilean law. Certainly, English law cases can provide guidance regarding many perennial reinsurance issues, including the meaning of claims control/co-operation clauses, the effect of follow the settlements clauses, aggregation of losses and so on.

Article 585 makes clear that reinsurance is independent of insurance, stating: “In no way does the reinsurance alter the contract of insurance. The insurer cannot postpone the payment of the indemnity for an accident to the insured on the basis of reinsurance.” This provision should go some way to addressing an issue that sometimes arises in which local cedants refuse to settle an inwards claim because they are mere fronting companies.

Article 586 says that:

reinsurance does not grant a direct action to the insured against the reinsurer, unless the contract of reinsurance establishes that payments due to the insured for accidents will be paid directly by the reinsurer to the insured or, if the accident has happened, the direct insurer assigns to the insured the rights that arise from the contract of reinsurance to collect them from the insurer.

The clause appears to recognise cut through clauses, which although widely used in facultative contracts, were of questionable value in the event of the insolvency of the insurer. It is not clear how this provision will be applied in practice. Logically, there is no reason why an insured cutting through to a reinsurer should be put in any better position than a cedant would have been. If that is correct, a reinsurer should be able to rely upon all of the defences that would have been available to it in an action brought against it by the cedant.

International reinsurers that remain uncomfortable with the rules regarding reinsurance should consider using English (or some other) choice of law and jurisdiction, at least on the outwards facultative contract.

 

 

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.