New NLRB Ruling Curbs Arbitration Agreements, Raises Tensions with Supreme Court Precedent

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact

In a decision certain to invite legal challenge, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently held that employment arbitration agreements that require employees to waive their rights to collective or class actions violate Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

In a much-anticipated decision, D.R. Horton, Inc., 357 N.L.R.B. No. 184, the NLRB focused on the validity of a mandatory arbitration agreement that required the arbitration of all claims on an individual basis, thus foreclosing the pursuit of any collective or class action suit. Such arbitration agreements are used regularly in certain industries as a condition of employment, as employers continue to seek additional certainty and control over their litigation risks.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact
more
less

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide