Ninth Circuit Effectively Does Away with Securities Claims for Aftermarket Purchasers

by Akerman LLP
Contact

Last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit filed pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"). Section 11 provides for claims involving false or misleading statements made in securities offerings. Though more limited in scope than Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5 claims for securities fraud, Section 11 plaintiffs – at least until now – have faced far lower pleading thresholds. Through a strict application of the Twombly/Iqbal pleading requirements, the Ninth Circuit has now made it "often impossible" for many Section 11 plaintiffs to surpass the pleading stage.

In In re Century Aluminum Company Securities Litigation, __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. Jan. 2, 2013), the plaintiffs purchased shares of common stock in defendant Century Aluminum Company around the time of a secondary offering of 24.5 million shares. Prior to the secondary offering, there were already 49 million shares in the market. The plaintiffs alleged that there were various false statements in the registration statement issued in connection with the secondary offering. Plaintiffs filed claims under Section 11 of the 1933 Act, which provides a cause of action to any person who buys a security issued under a materially false or misleading registration statement. It is well-established that purchasers can bring Section 11 claims if they bought the security in either the particular offering, or the aftermarket if they can trace the shares back to the offering.

"Aftermarket" standing is a frequent issue when a company has issued shares in multiple offerings. Indeed, the Ninth Circuit emphasized that aftermarket plaintiffs would have to allege that the shares they purchased came from the pool of shares issued in the secondary offering (either directly or through tracing) rather than the pool of previously existing shares. The plaintiffs admitted that they had purchased the shares in the aftermarket at a price different from the secondary offering price, and therefore alleged that they had "purchased common stock directly traceable to the offering."

The case is notable for its strict application of the pleading requirements set forth in Twombly and Iqbal, in which the U.S. Supreme Court abolished notice pleading in favor of "plausibility" pleading – that is, the complaint must now allege "factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." The Ninth Circuit found that none of the plaintiffs' allegations satisfied this standard, and affirmed dismissal of the Section 11 claims. The court disregarded the general allegation that plaintiffs "purchased common stock directly traceable to the offering" given its lack of factual specificity and the equally (perhaps even more) plausible inference that the shares came from the larger pool of 49 million originally offered shares versus the later 24.5 million shares.

The court acknowledged that it would be "often impossible" for aftermarket plaintiffs to bring Section 11 claims because of the circumstances generally surrounding aftermarket transactions – that is, trading is typically done through brokers that do not specify the source of shares contained within their block positions. And the Ninth Circuit's approach does not allow plaintiffs to attempt to establish such traceability in discovery – without the ability to plead it with factual specificity, their claims are subject to outright dismissal.

The court also rejected the plaintiffs' attempts to make more specific allegations of tracing in light of these general aftermarket features. For example, one plaintiff alleged that he had directed his broker to purchase shares in the secondary offering. Nonetheless, the court found that it was equally possible that the broker filled the order with shares that it had been holding from the original offering. In other words, the plaintiff would have to allege (without the benefit of discovery) that the broker "held only shares issued in the secondary offering" (emphasis in original). Other plaintiffs also alleged that they purchased shares just days after the offering, and on days when trading volume was particularly high given underwriters' disposition of large amounts of shares that they had just purchased in the offering. Even these circumstantial allegations "remain stuck in neutral territory" between the two offerings, and were thus deemed insufficient under Twombly/Iqbal.

The Ninth Circuit's decision is not universally accepted. Indeed, recent district court decisions outside of the Ninth Circuit (e.g. New York, Maryland) have expressly held that even general allegations of "tracing" satisfy the Twombly/Iqbal pleading requirements. It remains to be seen whether a circuit split will develop over this disposal

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Akerman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Akerman LLP
Contact
more
less

Akerman LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.