NLRB Focuses On Employers’ Internal Investigations

by Pepper Hamilton LLP

A version of this article was originally published in the November 2012 issue of The HR Specialist. It is reprinted here with permission.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal agency charged with enforcement of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), has increased its focus on social media and employer/employee communications, regardless of whether the employee is represented by a union. Section 7 of the NLRA protects the rights of both union and non-union employees to engage in “concerted activities,” which includes discussions about wages, hours, or terms and conditions of employment by and between employees.

In several recent cases in the last year, the NLRB determined that social media postings by employees about workplace issues qualified as protected concerted activity, and that employers violated the NLRA by taking adverse action against these employees for these postings. In these decisions, the NLRB has emphasized that employers may violate the NLRA simply by maintaining personnel policies that employees could reasonably interpret to be prohibiting protected concerted activities. This has resulted in employers revising their general policies to be more specific as to prohibited communications by employees and to include specific caveats that the policies do not intend to prohibit or in any way restrict legitimate employee communications protected by Section 7 of the NLRA.

Following this line of cases, in Banner Health System d/b/a Banner Estrella Med. Ctr., 358 NLRB No. 93 (July 30, 2012), the NLRB found that the employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA by instructing employees not to discuss ongoing internal investigations of employee misconduct. Section 8(a)(1) provides that it is an unfair labor practice “to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7.” Before this decision, the standard practice for employers investigating various kinds of misconduct, including discrimination, theft, or harassment, is a request by the employer that employees maintain confidentiality while the investigation proceeds.

In Banner Health, the employer’s human resources consultant used an “Interview of Complainant Form” when conducting an investigation of a complaint. This form was not given to the employee but it included an instruction that was verbally provided to the employee. The human resources consultant simply asked the employee to refrain from discussing the matter with his coworkers while the investigation is ongoing. The administrative law judge (ALJ) actually found that the instruction was for the purpose of “protecting the integrity of the investigation.” Therefore, he found that the employer had a legitimate business reason for giving the instruction. The ALJ got it right. Unfortunately, in a 2-1 decision, the NLRB rejected the employer’s argument (and the ALJ’s reasoning) that its confidentiality instruction was necessary to protect the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The NLRB determined that the employer’s “generalized concern with protecting the integrity of the investigation is insufficient to outweigh employees’ Section 7 rights.” Rather, the NLRB stated that to justify this type of instruction an employer must show a legitimate business need that outweighs an employee’s Section 7 rights. The NLRB held that it was the employer’s burden “to first determine whether in any given investigation witnesses needed protection, evidence was in danger of being destroyed, testimony was in danger of being fabricated, or there was a need to prevent a cover up.” In essence, the NLRB is now requiring that employers make sure that they can establish that the need for confidentiality is warranted under the facts of the particular investigation before a request for confidentiality can be made to the employee witness. Practically speaking, an employer may not know, at the onset of a workplace investigation, where the investigation may lead and whether a lack of confidentiality will somehow taint the investigation going forward. Although this requirement will certainly make investigations more difficult for employers, it is an obstacle that can be cleared by taking the appropriate steps.

Therefore, in light of the Banner Health decision, employers should review their policies and practices regarding internal investigations and eliminate from the process any component that includes a blanket instruction that complaining employees or other witnesses refrain from communicating about the issue with co-workers. If an employer believes that confidentiality is needed to protect the integrity of the investigation, as it should be for most investigations, it should protect itself by providing the witness with a specific, written reason why confidentiality must be maintained as the investigation proceeds. For example, in a sexual harassment investigation an employer can legitimately maintain that it is vital to protect confidentiality in the workplace, both for ascertaining the “truth” of any harassment allegation and also for protecting the reputations of the alleged harasser and the victim.

In conclusion, although this decision reflects the NLRB’s lack of understanding concerning workplace investigations in general and, specifically, that witness confidentiality is crucial to the success of same, a savvy employer can avoid running afoul of this new NLRB standard by taking the additional step of providing written justification for maintaining confidentiality as part of any witness interview.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pepper Hamilton LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pepper Hamilton LLP

Pepper Hamilton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.