Notice and Reporting Requirements for Employers Under AB 685

Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi LLP
Contact

Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi LLP

After 12 months of executive orders and emergency regulations aimed at tackling the challenges created by COVID-19 in the workplace, it is clear the California Legislature has prioritized safety and reporting in order to help curb the pandemic. Specifically, the Legislature passed a suite of laws enforcing newer and more strict reporting standards regarding COVID-19 for employers statewide. Assembly Bill (AB) 685 took effect January 1, 2021 and imposes new notice and reporting requirements on employers when an employee tests positive for COVID-19. Additionally, Cal/OSHA has expanded enforcement authority to issue serious violation citations as well as shutdown workplaces that are an imminent hazard related to COVID-19.

Under the new statute (codified as Labor Code §§6325, 6432, and 6409.6) when an employer receives notice of potential exposure to COVID-19, the employer must: (1) provide notice to employees and others at work (new LC 6409.6), and (2) report the positive test to local health authorities. It is important to remember that AB 685’s requirements apply regardless of whether COVID-19 is contracted in the workplace. However, AB 685 does not apply to employees who “as part of their duties” conduct COVID-19 testing, screening or provide direct patient care or treatment to individuals who are known to have tested positive for COVID-19. The new laws’ requirements are strict, and the penalties for failing to follow them can be stiff, and we recommend reviewing not only our guide below, but the full text of the bill to ensure compliance.

When Is An Employer Required To Issue A Notice?

Under AB 685, when the employer “receives notice of potential exposure to COVID-19, ”the employer must provide ‘prescribed notice’ to all employees as well as the employers of subcontracted employees.”  Section 6409.6 covers both notice of exposure, as well as the notice that must be sent to employees. Notice to the employer of potential exposure can come from: (1) a public health official or a licensed medical provider that an employee was exposed to a “qualifying individual” at the worksite; (2) an employee or their emergency contact that the employee is a “qualifying individual”; (3) “Through the testing protocol of the employer that the employee is qualifying individual”; (4) from a subcontracted employer that a “qualifying individual” was on the worksite of the employer.

A “qualifying individual” as defined in the statute can be someone who has: (1) a laboratory confirmed case of COVID-19; or (2) a positive COVID-19 diagnosis from a licensed health care provider; or (3) a COVID-19-related order to isolate provided by a public health official; or (4) died due to COVID-19. Any of these four types of individuals would constitute a qualifying individual pursuant to Labor Code section 6409.6(d)(4). Therefore, if an employee is exposed, or potentially exposed, to a qualifying individual, the employee must be notified.

Once the employer is required to issue a notice, the employer must send the written notice to the employee within one business day notifying them of a positive confirmed case of COVID-19.

Who Must Receive Notice?

There are three categories of people who must receive notice under AB 685; (1) employees (2) the exclusive representative of the employees (union representatives) (3) employers of subcontracted employees.

Therefore, if an employer is a general contractor and hires a subcontractor, under AB 685, that employer must send the notice to the subcontractor’s employer as well. Also, a worksite is defined as the “building, store, facility, agricultural field or other location where a worker worked during the infectious period.” It does not apply to buildings, floors or other locations of the employer that a qualifying individual did not enter. This means that if an employer has multiple worksite locations, the employer should only notify employees who were at the same worksite location as the qualifying individual.

What Is Required In The Notice?

The employer must provide written notice to all affected employees per the above that they may have been exposed to COVID-19, and notice of the disinfection and safety plan that the employer plans to implement and complete per the guidelines of the federal Centers for Disease Control. Therefore, if the employer already has a disinfection and safety plan in place, employers can simply attach it to the notice. If they do not have a disinfection and safety plan in place, they should incorporate it into the notice as one document.

The employer must also provide all employees who may have been potentially exposed additional information regarding COVID-19 related benefits which the employee may be entitled under applicable federal, state, or local laws, including but not limited to, workers’ compensation, and options for exposed employees, including COVID-19 related leave, company sick leave, state-mandated leave, supplemental sick leave, or negotiated leave provisions, as well as anti-retaliation and antidiscrimination protections of the employee.

How Should An Employer Notify Their Employees?

Under AB 685, the method of notice is to be done in a manner the employer normally uses to communicate employment related information. The notice needs to be done in English and in the language understood by the majority of the employees. Written notice, includes, but is not limited to, personal service, email, or text message if it can reasonably be anticipated to be received by the employee within one business day of sending.

Furthermore, §6409.6(k) requires the employer to keep a record of these written notices given to employees for three years. Keeping track of notices given to employees is likely going to prove critically important when communicating with Cal/OSHA under AB 685. Employers are therefore encouraged to have their AB 685 notices be either signed or acknowledged by employees in some form (perhaps in a return email acknowledging receipt) to avoid citations and penalties by Cal/OSHA.

When And What Is An Employer Required To Report To Local Health Agencies?

If an employer is notified that they have enough cases of COVID-19 to qualify as an “outbreak,” the employer is required to notify within 48 hours the local public health agency in the jurisdiction of the worksite the names, number, occupation, and worksite of the employees who meet the definition of a qualifying individual. Although the California Legislature did not define “outbreak”, Cal/OSHA will presumably use the definition of the Department of Public Health, which is three or more laboratory confirmed cases of COVID-19 within a two-week period among workers who live in different households. Note that this is a different standard for an outbreak than as defined in SB 1159 which passed in September, 2020.

It is important to distinguish here, that when issuing notices as discussed above, employers should make every effort to not disclose the infected or potentially infected employee’s personal information. However, when reporting to local public health agencies, employers are required to disclose the names of potentially infected employees. This is the only place aside from a claim form filed where personal information is required or even allowed. Presumably, disclosure of employee’s information to local public health agencies is required for preventative measures such as contact tracing. Remember, reporting an outbreak to a local public health agency is not required for a “health facility” under Health and Safety Code Section 1250.

What Are The Reporting Requirements For COVID-19 To Cal/OSHA?

Generally, an employer is required to report any serious illness, serious injury, or death to Cal/OSHA. This usually includes most inpatient hospitalizations. However, the illness must be work related and meet specific recording criteria. So what about COVID-19?

Employers must report cases of COVID-19 to Cal/OSHA only if: (1) there is at least one confirmed case of COVID-19; & (2) It is work related (that there is a known exposure at work); and (3) it involves one or more of the general reporting criteria (meaning treatment beyond first aid, or days away from work). Bear in mind that the COVID-19 case does not have to be confirmed through laboratory testing before an employer is required to report to Cal/OSHA. The COVID-19 case must be reported if it meets the definition of “serious injury or illness” irrespective of when a possible exposure occurred. Reporting to Cal/OSHA is not an admission of work-relatedness.

Prior to AB 685, an employer’s duty to report injuries to Cal/OSHA only arose when the employer knew of a work-related injury or the employee asked to file a claim form. However, under AB 685, in order to determine if a case needs to be reported, the employer must evaluate the employee’s work duties and environment to determine the work relatedness. While this ambiguity will hopefully be clarified soon in the regulations, it is clear at this time that an employer is obligated to do their own investigation to determine whether the exposure is work related. In this regard, the employer should err on the side of caution and report all COVID-19 “cases” and related exposure that occur in the work place.

Takeaway

At this juncture, the full extent of Cal/OSHA’s enforcement of AB 685’s notice and reporting requirements remains to be seen. However, considering the Legislature has prioritized tracking and tracing workplace exposure to COVID-19, Cal/OSHA is expected to strictly enforce AB 685’s notice and reporting requirements. Given that employee notices in particular must be circulated within one business day, it is imperative that employers have an effective and swift notice process in place. Employers are encouraged to consult with experienced employment counsel to ensure they are fully compliant with AB 685 in order to avoid substantial Cal/OSHA fines and workplace shut downs.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi LLP
Contact
more
less

Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide