OCR Issues New Title IX Guidance

Carlton Fields

Carlton Fields

Nearly a year after the implementation of the 2020 Title IX amended regulations, the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has released "Questions and Answers on the Title IX Regulations on Sexual Harassment (July 2021)." The Q&A provides clarifications about the 2020 amendments as well as an appendix with sample policy language. This guidance will undoubtedly assist schools as they refine their written policies for the upcoming school year.

The key takeaway from the Q&A is that the 2020 amendments operate as a floor - representing the "minimum steps that a school must take in response to notice of alleged sexual harassment." The Q&A clarifies that schools may take additional measures to protect against sexual harassment so long as those measures do not conflict with the 2020 amendments. This is true even if the misconduct at issue does not meet the definition of "sexual harassment" provided by the 2020 amendments.

To that end, the Q&A suggests that schools consider a number of additional optional measures that may provide students with greater protections and ensure that complaints are resolved expeditiously. For example, while the 2020 amendments do not provide a prescribed time period, the Q&A suggests that schools determine their own reasonably prompt time frames for concluding the grievance process. Previous OCR guidance suggested a 60-day time frame for resolving sexual harassment complaints excluding any subsequent appeals. Likewise, the Q&A also raises the possibility of schools putting rules of decorum in place for conducting live hearings. If implemented, any such rules must apply equally to all parties.

Another optional measure discussed in the Q&A is an informal resolution process. The 2020 amendments allowed for, but did not require, schools to adopt an informal resolution process that parties could voluntarily engage in to resolve disputes. However, the term "informal process" has never been defined by OCR, leaving many schools unsure about what such a process would look like in practice. The Q&A explains that because the term is undefined, schools are allowed "the discretion to adopt whatever process best serves the needs of its community." Helpfully, the Q&A points readers to its appendix at section XV, which provides model policy language that may assist schools in crafting their own informal resolution policies.

Title IX coordinators should review this guidance with an eye toward revamping their Title IX policies for the upcoming year. Schools should consider adopting an informal resolution process that serves the needs of their community.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Carlton Fields

Carlton Fields on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.