Preliminary Hurdle for Cayman Derivative Claims Does Not Bar Suit in New York

by Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact

A shareholder bringing a contested derivative claim in the Cayman Islands must seek leave from the court before proceeding.  This litigation prerequisite -- imposed by Rule 12A of the Rules of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands (“Rule 12A”) -- requires a prima facie factual showing, with the aim of protecting corporations from “vexatious or unfounded litigation.”[1]  But when a Cayman Islands-related derivative claim is brought in New York’s Commercial Division, does the same rule apply?  The New York Court of Appeals recently answered “No,” holding in Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd. that Rule 12A is a procedural rule that does not apply to matters litigated in New York courts.[2]

Substance vs. Procedure

Whether Rule 12A applies to claims litigated in New York courts turns on whether it is a part of substantive Cayman Islands corporate law, or instead is a procedural rule applicable to cases brought in Cayman Islands courts.  The substance of Cayman Islands corporate law is implicated in a derivative claim because such a claim is brought by a shareholder on behalf of the corporation.  Since New York follows the internal affairs doctrine, which requires that the substantive law of the place of incorporation be applied to govern the internal relations of a corporation, if Rule 12A were a substantive law provision, it would have to be applied to derivative claims involving a Cayman corporation.[3]  Matters of procedural law, however, are governed by the law of the forum, so if Rule 12A were procedural in nature, it would not apply to claims litigated in New York courts.[4]

Davis v. Scottish Re

Plaintiff Paul Davis brought both direct and derivative claims against several defendants, including Cayman Islands-based reinsurer Scottish Re Group Ltd. (“Scottish Re”), in the New York County Commercial Division.  Justice O. Peter Sherwood of the Commercial Division dismissed two of the derivative claims for lack of standing on two alternative bases:  first, that Davis had failed to comply with Cayman Rule 12A, and second, that Davis lacked standing under Cayman Islands common law.[5]  The First Department affirmed the holding that noncompliance with Rule 12A required dismissal of the derivative claims and certified an appeal of its decision – which did not address common law standing – to the Court of Appeals.[6]

At the Court of Appeals, Scottish Re argued that Rule 12A operates as a substantive gatekeeper in derivative actions and must be applied in New York litigation pursuant to the internal affairs doctrine.  In other words, Scottish Re argued that Rule 12A is best understood as a substantive component of the Cayman Islands Companies Law designed to raise the threshold for bringing derivative claims.  In addition, Scottish Re analogized Rule 12A to statutes of repose, which create barriers to certain claims regardless of the time when any injury accrued, and which have been held by the Court of Appeals to constitute substantive laws for choice-of-law purposes.[7]

Davis countered that Rule 12A is a procedural rule that governs the method for bringing a claim in Cayman Islands courts, and does not speak to the substantive law governing those claims.  The core of Davis’s argument was textual:  Rule 12A is, on its face, a rule of court.  In Davis’s view, Rule 12A is analogous to the provisions of the CPLR that serve as procedural gatekeepers at certain stages in litigation, such as CPLR 3211 (governing motions to dismiss) and 3212 (governing motions for summary judgment).[8]

The Court of Appeals agreed with Davis’s view that Rule 12A is procedural, and provided four main reasons for its conclusion.  First, the court noted that the rule applied to derivative actions “‘commenced by writ,’” and was triggered by a “‘notice of intention to defend.’”[9]  The fact that both of these procedures are specific to litigation in the Cayman Islands courts evinced a procedural function.  Second, the court noted that Rule 12A applied to “every” shareholder action, not only those involving Cayman entities, counseling against an interpretation of the rule as a substantive component of the law governing Cayman Islands corporations. [10]  Third, the court observed that if the drafters had “intended that Rule 12A apply to derivative actions involving Cayman Islands companies anywhere in the world, it could have expressly provided as such” as both the British Virgin Islands and Canada have done for corporations based in their respective jurisdictions.[11]  Finally, turning to policy concerns, the court noted that “were Rule 12A held to be substantive, it is unclear what procedural path a party seeking to bring a derivative action in New York on behalf of a Cayman company would follow to comply with Rule 12A.”[12]  Specifically, the court cited the practical uncertainty about where and how to initiate a claim, as well as ambiguity about the binding effect of a Cayman court’s Rule 12A determination on later stages of the proceedings in New York court.[13]

The Court of Appeals also rejected Scottish Re’s analogy to statutes of repose.  Unlike a statute of repose, which can operate to bar a claim before it accrues and thus “creates an absolute barrier to a plaintiff’s right of action,” the court found Rule 12A more analogous to a statute of limitations – which is considered procedural for choice-of-law purposes – because it “neither creates a right, nor defeats it.”[14]  The court further noted that New York courts apply “other states’ and countries’ substantive laws with regularity”[15] and that New York has its own gatekeeper provisions to weed out meritless claims.

Conclusion

This decision confirms that the New York courts are open to shareholders in foreign companies who seek to bring derivative lawsuits here.  Nonetheless, although the Court of Appeals held that Rule 12A does not apply to claims litigated in New York courts, the path has not yet been cleared for Davis to proceed with his derivative claims.  The Court of Appeals did not address the question of common law standing, since that issue had not been reached by the First Department.  As a result, the Commercial Division’s dismissal of Davis’s derivative claims on that basis remains undisturbed for now.[16]

 


[1] Renova Res. Private Equity Ltd. v. Gilbertson, [2009] CILR 268, 283 (citing Cayman Islands Grand Court Rule 12A (1995)).

[2] Davis v. Scottish Re Grp. Ltd., No. 111, 2017 NY Slip Op. 08157, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 3277 (Nov. 20, 2017).

[3] Id. at *5.

[4] Id.

[5] Id. at *2.

[6] Id.; see Davis v. Scottish Re Grp. Ltd., 138 A.D.3d 230, 239, 28 N.Y.S.3d 18 (1st Dep’t 2016).

[7] See Tanges v. Heidelberg N. Am., Inc., 93 N.Y.2d 48, 53, 687 N.YS.2d 604 (1999).

[8] Davis, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 3277, at *6, 13.

[9] Id. at *7.

[10] Id. at *8.

[11] Id. at *8-9.

[12] Id. at *12.

[13] Id. at *12-13.

[14] Id. at *10-11.

[15] Id. at *13.

[16] Id. at *14.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact
more
less

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.