Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending June 21, 2019

Carlton Fields
Contact

Carlton Fields

Real Property Update

  • Mortgagee Liability: because section 701.04(1)(a), Florida Statutes, requires that the holder of a mortgage deliver to the mortgagor a written estoppel letter setting forth the unpaid balance of the mortgage loans and "other charges properly due under and secured by the mortgage[,]" mortgagor could sustain cause of action for damages - Laptopplaza, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Case No. 3D8-131 (FLA. 3d DCA June 19, 2019) (dismissal reversed, and remanded with instruction to amend complaint)

Financial Services Update

  • TCPA / Unsolicited Fax / Legislative v. Interpretive Rule: a district court dismissed a TCPA action brought by the recipient of an unsolicited fax against a publisher who sent the fax. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the district court's judgment, holding that the district court should have followed a Federal Communication Commission's order opining that the TCPA prohibits unsolicited faxes promoting goods and services, even at no cost. The Supreme Court vacated the appellate ruling and remanded for analysis of whether a Federal Communication Commission's order is a "legislative rule" or "interpretive rule." If the order is deemed an "interpretive rule" it may not be binding on the district court - PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705 (June 20, 2019) (vacating and remanding)
  • FDUTPA / Attorneys' Fees Award: plaintiff not entitled to attorneys' fees incurred as part of defending an initial fee award under FDUTPA, because the benefit of such an award would inure only to plaintiff's attorneys as plaintiff had no obligation to pay for this work - Alhassid v. Nation Star Mortg, LLC, No. 18-11985 (11th Cir. 2019) (affirming denial of award of attorney's fees)

Title Insurance Update

  • Negligent Procurement: Delaware's time of discovery rule applies to allegations of negligent procurement of title insurance and precludes title insurance agent's motion to dismiss based on the application of the statute of limitations - Fansler v. North Am. Title Ins. Co., No. N17-09-015 (Del. Sup. Ct. June 19, 2019) (memorandum opinion denying defendant's motion to dismiss)

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Carlton Fields
Contact
more
less

Carlton Fields on:

Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.