SCA’s Attempted Dismissal Of Contractor’s Claims Defeated – Claims Survived!

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP

In a highly significant recent case, the New York City School Construction Authority (“SCA”) attempted to dismiss a subcontractor’s claims seeking nearly $2.9M in extra work and $2M in delay damages. However, the state court hearing the case rejected the SCA’s lack-of-notice arguments.

The SCA’S “COFED” Arguments -

In the current case, the SCA’s argument was a litany of typical “lack of notice” type arguments based on when the SCA contended that the contractor knew or should have known that its demands for payment had been denied (i.e. when the claims “accrued”). The SCA, as well as many other public owners, use these “lack of notice” type defenses so often we coined the derisive acronym “COFED” (“Contractor Forfeiture Enhancement Device”) to disparagingly refer to such abusively used notice provisions.

Please see full Alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.