SCOTUS denies motion of Republican State Attorney Generals to participate in oral argument in case challenging constitutionality of CFPB’s funding

Ballard Spahr LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied the motion filed by the 27 Republican State Attorney Generals who filed an amicus brief in support of Community Financial Services Association in CFSA v. CFPB asking for leave to participate in oral argument.  No explanation for the denial was given by the Court.  While the Supreme Court almost routinely grants requests by the Solicitor General to participate in oral argument as an amicus, it only grants requests by other amici to participate in oral argument very infrequently.

In the case, CFSA has asked the Supreme Court to affirm the Fifth Circuit panel’s decision which held that the CFPB’s funding mechanism violates the Appropriations Clause of the U.S. Constitution.  CFSA filed a response in opposition to the AGs’ motion in which it asserted that “undivided argument would be most appropriate and beneficial for this Court.”  Oral argument is scheduled for October 3, 2023.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact
more
less

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide