SEC proposes revised “significant subsidiary” tests for investment companies and reduced financial information requirements for fund acquisitions

On May 3, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to propose rule amendments with regard to financial disclosures about acquired and disposed businesses (the “Proposal”), including amendments specific to business development companies and registered closed-end funds (collectively, “Investment Companies”). Among other things, the Proposal includes a new definition of “significant subsidiary” in Rule 1-02(w) that is tailored for Investment Companies. The SEC also proposed a new Rule 6-11 for Regulation S-X and amendments to Form N-14, both of which would impact financial reporting of Investment Company acquisitions. The proposed changes will also impact the financial disclosure requirements for acquired businesses in Rules 3-05 and 3-14 of Regulation S-X.

The proposed amendments will be subject to a 60-day public comment period following its publication in the Federal Register. The full text of the Proposal is available at

Proposed revisions to “Significant Subsidiary” tests
Various rules under Regulation S-X, including Rules 3-05, 3-09 and 4-08(g), currently require Investment Companies to apply the definition of “significant subsidiary” in Rule 1-02(w).  For example, Investment Companies are required to use the “significant subsidiary” test in Rule 1-02(w) when assessing whether separate financial statements or summarized financial information of certain significant portfolio companies need to be included in such Investment Company’s periodic reports pursuant to Rules 3-09 and 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X.  The Proposal offers a new Rule 1-02(w)(2), which would revise two of the three Rule 1-02(w) current significance tests (the investment test and the income test) and eliminate the asset test for Investment Companies. The SEC believes that the proposed “significant subsidiary” definition under new Rule 1-02(w)(2) would allow Investment Companies to “avoid unnecessary regulatory complexity and the potential confusion associated with the existing definitions.”

Revisions to investment test
Currently, the investment test under Rule 1-02(w) measures whether the registrant’s and its other subsidiaries’ investment in and advances to the tested subsidiary exceeds 10% of the registrant’s total assets on a consolidated basis.  Under the proposed Rule 1-02(w)(2), the investment test would instead measure whether an Investment Company’s investment in and advances to the tested subsidiary exceeds 10% of the value of the total investments of the Investment Company on a consolidated basis. Thus, the denominator for the investment test would be the value of total investments, instead of total assets, as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year determined in accordance with US GAAP and Section 2(a)(41) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

Elimination of asset test
As requested by Sutherland in its November 30, 2015 comment letter, the asset test currently included in Rule 1-02(w), which compares the proportionate share of the total assets of the tested subsidiary to the total assets of the registrant on a consolidated basis, would not be included in the proposed Rule 1-02(w)(2) because the SEC finds that the asset test is generally not meaningful when applied to Investment Companies.

Revisions to income test
Currently, the income test under Rule 1-02(w) measures whether the registrant’s and its other subsidiaries’ equity in the income from continuing operations before income taxes of the tested subsidiary, exclusive of amounts attributable to any non-controlling interests, exceeds 10% of such income of the registrant and its subsidiaries consolidated for the most recently completed fiscal year. Under the proposed Rule 1-02(w)(2), the income test would adopt the income test from Rule 8b-2 of the 1940 Act, which measures the total investment income of the tested subsidiary against the investment income of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries. However, the proposed income test under Rule 1-02(w)(2) would include any net realized gains and losses and net change in unrealized gains and losses in calculating both the investment income for the tested subsidiary and the registrant’s total investment income, and would utilize an 80% threshold, rather than the 10% threshold in Rule 8b-2. Moreover, under Rule 1-02(w)(2), a tested subsidiary would be deemed significant if the test yields a condition of greater than either (1) 80% by itself, or (2) 10% and the investment test yields a result of greater than 5% (which the SEC refers to as the “alternate income test”). A proposed instruction to Rule 1-02(w)(2) would permit registrants to compute the income test using the average of the registrant’s total investment income for the past five years.

The SEC’s discussion of, and request for comment on, the proposed Rule 1-02(w)(2) is set forth on pages 97-106 of the Proposal. Please see Annex A for a list of the specific questions relating to the proposed Rule 1-02(w)(2) for which the SEC is seeking comment.

Reduced financial information requirements for fund acquisitions 
In addition to the revised “significant subsidiary” tests, revisions to Rule 3-05 would, among other things, no longer require separate financial statements of an acquired business once the business has been included in the registrant’s post-acquisition financial statements for a complete fiscal year, clarify when financial statements and pro forma financial information are required, and require the financial statements of the acquired business to cover only the two most recent fiscal years.  The proposed amendments would also bring Rule 3-14 in line with the revised Rule 3-05.

The SEC also proposed a new Rule 6-11 for Regulation S-X, which would cover financial reporting in the event of a fund acquisition of another Investment Company, a private fund, or any private account managed by an investment adviser, and would be based on the revised Rules 3-05 and 3-14.  Rule 6-11 will look at the facts and circumstances to evaluate whether a fund acquisition has occurred, which will include the acquisition of all or substantially all portfolio investments held by another fund.

Among other things, under Rule 6-11: (i) only one year of audited financial statements would be required for fund acquisitions, which is a change from existing Rule 3-05 requirements that require between one and three years of audited financial statements; (ii) Investment Companies would be permitted to provide financial statements for acquired private funds that were prepared in accordance with GAAP without revising and re-auditing them to comply with Regulation S-X requirements, but such financial statements will need to be supplemented with schedules listing each acquired fund’s portfolio investment as required by Article 12 of Regulation S-X, and (iii) the proposed Rule 1-02(w)(2) would be applied in determining whether financial statements of acquired funds must be provided, using the investment test and the alternate income test for Investment Companies and substituting 20% for 10%.

The SEC is also proposing to eliminate the requirement to provide pro forma financial information for Investment Companies in connection with fund acquisitions, which is currently required by Rule 11-01 of Regulation S-X.  In place of the current requirement, the SEC is proposing new Rule 6-11(d) to require Investment Companies to provide supplemental information about the newly combined entity including, among other things: (i) a pro forma fee table that shows the fee structure of the combined entity; (ii) if the acquisition will result in a material change to the acquired fund’s investment portfolio, a schedule of investments (supplemented with narrative disclosure) of the acquired fund modified to show the effects of such change, and (iii) narrative disclosure about material differences in accounting policies of the acquired fund in comparison to the combined entity.

The Proposal also contemplates revising financial statement disclosure requirements of Form N-14, which is the form used by Investment Companies to register securities issued in business acquisition transactions, to be consistent with the financial reporting requirements of the proposed Rule 6-11.

The SEC’s discussion of, and request for comment on, the proposed Rule 6-11 is set forth on pages 111-117 of the Proposal. Please see Annex B for a list of the specific questions relating to the proposed Rule 6-11 and changes to Form N-14 for which the SEC is seeking comment.

Annex A

SEC requests for comment on proposed Rule 1-02(w)(2)

  • Should we create a separate definition of significant subsidiary in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X specifically for investment companies? If so, is the proposed definition appropriate when used for Rules 3-09 and 4-08(g) and proposed Rule 6-11 with respect to investment companies?
  • Should we make corresponding changes to the definition of significant subsidiary in Rule 8b-2? Are there reasons, with respect to investment companies, that the definitions of significant subsidiary in Rule 8b-2 and Regulation S-X should differ?
  • Should we utilize the value of total investments of an investment company as a denominator rather than total assets for the proposed investment test for investment companies? Should we change the numerator to a different metric than value of investments in and advances to the tested subsidiary? If so, which metric and why? Should we use the definition of value from the Investment Company Act for purposes of the Regulation S-X definition of significant subsidiary?
  • Should an asset test apply to investment companies? Are there situations in which an asset test would uniquely identify a significant subsidiary? If we were to retain an asset test for investment companies, how could it be modified to better reflect measures of significance relevant to investment companies?
  • Should we establish an income test for investment companies to utilize the absolute value of the sum of: (1) investment income, such as interest, dividend, and other income; (2) change in unrealized gain/loss, and (3) realized gain/loss as the numerator? If so, should we also change the denominator to be the investment company’s absolute value of change in assets resulting from operations? Should we use absolute values of these entries from the statement of operations or should we use the absolute value of the gain or loss on each individual portfolio security? Are there other measures we should consider?
  • Should we increase the threshold of the income test for investment companies to 80%? Should we make the proposed income test for investment companies conjunctive with the proposed investment test for investment companies? Are the proposed thresholds of 10% and 5% appropriate or should they be different? If different, what thresholds should we use to make the proposed income test conjunctive with the proposed investment test?
  • Should we base the proposed income test for investment companies on the individual absolute value of the components rather than netting them out? For example, in a fund with significant investment income, that income could be offset by an equal amount of realized and unrealized losses, creating a relatively small change in net assets resulting from operations. If we were to use the absolute value of each of the components, should we reduce the threshold of the proposed income test?
  • Under our proposal, a five-year average would be used for the income test for investment companies if the registrant and its subsidiaries consolidated has an insignificant change in net assets resulting from operations for the most recent fiscal year. Should the five-year average also be required for the tested subsidiary under similar circumstances? Should this proposed amendment be more similar to the one for non-investment company registrants? Should a five-year average be required only if the absolute value of the change in net assets resulting from operations for the most recent fiscal year is at least 10% lower than the average of the absolute value of such amounts for the registrant for each of its last five years?
  • We are proposing amendments to Rule 1-02(w)(2) to assist investment company registrants in making significance determinations. Are the proposed amendments appropriate? If not, are there different or additional amendments we should consider?
  • Should we make further modifications to the proposed income test for investment companies in situations where the tested subsidiary is not an investment company? For example, should we require the use of net income for a non-investment company subsidiary when compared to the registrant’s change in net assets resulting from operations?
  • Instead of having specific percentage conditions, should we adopt a materiality standard? For example, should we adopt a standard that deems a subsidiary as significant if it is material to an understanding of the registrant’s financial condition?

Annex B

SEC Requests for Comment on Proposed Rule 6-11 and Changes to Form N-14

  • Should we adopt proposed Rule 6-11 for acquisitions of funds by registrants? Have we appropriately defined what constitutes a fund acquisition? Are there other types of private funds not covered by the Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) exclusion that should be covered? Is it appropriate to use a facts and circumstances-based evaluation to determine whether a fund acquisition has or will occur? Are there other factors that should be considered in defining a fund acquisition?
  • Should we permit the presentation of audited financial statements of acquired funds for only the most recent fiscal year? Should we require the same reporting periods required by Rule 3-18 instead? If so, should we permit any registered investment company registrant, such as unit investment trusts, to use Rule 3-18 and not limit it to only registered management investment companies?
  • Should we treat business development companies and registered investment companies the same? Should business development companies follow the reporting periods set forth in proposed Rule 3-05 instead of proposed Rule 6-11?
  • Should we require registrants to provide the audited schedules required by Article 12 for an acquired private fund, including a schedule of investments that requires each investment to be listed separately? Should we require only a smaller set of schedules required by Article 12, such as those required by Rules 12-12, 12-12A, 12-12B, 12-12C, and 12-13? Should we allow registrants to provide schedules that are permitted under US GAAP rather than Article 12?
  • Is there any other disclosure by a registrant or an acquired fund that would be important to a fund investor? If so, please specify in detail.
  • Should we permit registrants to have the option to file financial statements on an individual or a combined basis for acquired funds that are part of a group of related funds for any periods they are under common control or management?
  • Should we continue to use the significant subsidiary definition as the basis for evaluating whether financial statements of an acquired fund should be filed? If so, is 20% the appropriate threshold? If not, what would be the appropriate threshold?
  • Should we not apply the 80% income test for purposes of determining whether financial statements of an acquired fund should be filed?
  • Should we permit a registrant to cease providing audited financial statements of the acquired fund once an audited balance sheet for the registrant is filed that reflects the assets of the acquired fund? Should the registrant be required to continue to file audited financial statements of the acquired fund until an audited statement of operations for a complete fiscal year reflecting the acquired fund has been filed?
  • Is it appropriate to permit the financial statements of an acquired private fund to comply with US GAAP and only the schedule requirements in Article 12? Should we require Article 12 schedules to be filed with respect to the acquired private fund, even though it may be likely to result in additional costs?
  • Is the proposed language related to independence standards sufficiently clear? Should we specify the “applicable independence standards?” If so, how should they be specified? Are there circumstances where there are no “applicable independence standards?” In those circumstances, which independence standards should apply?
  • Should we eliminate the requirement for investment companies to provide pro forma financial statements for the combined entity after a business acquisition? To what extent does pro forma financial information remain material in the investment company context? Please provide specific examples of how the current pro forma financial information is utilized.
  • Should we require the pro forma fee table, schedule of investments and narrative disclosure as outlined above? Is there other information we should require in lieu of pro forma financial statements of the combined entity? If so, what other information would be material to investors?
  • Should we conform the financial statement disclosure requirements in Item 14 of Form N-14 with proposed Rule 6-11? If not, how and why should the disclosures differ?
  • Should we require the supplemental financial information to be disclosed in Form N-14?

[View source.]

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.