Second Circuit Rules U.S. Court Has Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Employee Who Allegedly Misappropriated Trade Secrets Without Ever Setting Foot in the United States

by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Last month, a federal appeals court issued a ruling permitting an employer in Connecticut to pursue a claim against a former employee who allegedly misappropriated the employer's confidential information from outside the state. The ruling may have important repercussions in trade secret cases where an employee is accused of engaging in wrongdoing that involves an employer's computer servers. In reversing the lower federal court in Connecticut, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that, consistent with due process, Connecticut's long-arm statute grants personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant who remotely accesses computer servers physically located in Connecticut. In reviving the lawsuit, the Second Circuit generally addressed the ability of employers residing in one state to pursue claims against employees who allegedly have misappropriated corporate confidential information while residing and working outside the state (and even in another country).

In MacDermid, Inc. v. Deiter, a Connecticut-based employer brought a lawsuit against a former employee in Connecticut under that state's law, despite the fact that the defendant employee was located in, and acting from, Canada when she allegedly misappropriated the company's confidential information. The defendant lived in Canada and worked for a Canadian subsidiary of MacDermid until April 2011, when MacDermid terminated her employment for reasons unrelated to the alleged misappropriation. As a condition of her employment, Deiter had signed a document acknowledging that MacDermid stored proprietary information on computer servers maintained in Connecticut. She also had agreed to protect and properly use her employer's confidential information, and that she was not authorized to transfer such information to a personal email account. In a pattern familiar to many employers, MacDermid alleged that Deiter, using her home computer, misappropriated trade secrets from the company by forwarding confidential data files from her work email account to her personal email account. Deiter moved to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court dismissed the case, and MacDermid appealed.

The Second Circuit disagreed with the lower court's conclusion that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Deiter because her actions were limited to emailing information "from one computer in Canada to another computer in Canada." While it is true, the court noted, that Deiter interacted only with computers in Canada, in doing so she accessed her employer's information only by accessing its computer servers located in Connecticut. The court found that Deiter's physical location was immaterial because "[t]he statute requires only that the computer network, not the user, be located in Connecticut." Moreover, Connecticut's long-arm statute "was enacted as part of a statutory scheme intended to prohibit unauthorized persons from using computers or networks" with the intent of committing computer or data malfeasance. The court noted that extending the Connecticut long-arm statute to a non-resident who committed any of the alleged wrongful acts while present in Connecticut "would not have been necessary because that person would have already been subject to jurisdiction" under the state's existing statute conferring jurisdiction.

As noted in the decision, most Internet users are unaware of the location of the servers through which they send their emails. Because she signed the above-referenced agreement, however, Deiter knew that her employer's servers were in Connecticut, and thus, the Second Circuit found that she purposefully availed herself of the privilege of conducting activities within Connecticut. Deiter did so, the court said, because when she sent emails using MacDermid's computer systems, "she was aware 'of the centralization and housing of the companies' email system and the storage of confidential, proprietary information and trade secrets'" in Connecticut, and "used that email system and its Connecticut servers in retrieving and emailing confidential files." Finding that personal jurisdiction was reasonable under the due process clause, the court further noted that "efficiency and social policies against computer-based theft are generally best served by adjudication in the state from which computer files have been misappropriated."

In recent years, U.S. courts have seen increasing numbers of civil and criminal cases filed against employees alleged to have misappropriated confidential corporate information by downloading or otherwise improperly accessing such information from computer servers. Although MacDermid is based on a Connecticut jurisdictional statute that is somewhat unique with respect to its scope, the Second Circuit (which has jurisdiction over Connecticut, New York, and Vermont) clearly states that policies against computer-based misappropriation generally are best served by adjudication in the jurisdiction where the information was stored. Accordingly, U.S. companies and other federal courts now may look to MacDermid to support extending personal jurisdiction over a defendant alleged to have misappropriated trade secrets from an out-of-state location. While jurisdiction is distinct from issues such as choice of substantive law and the extraterritorial effect of state statutes, MacDermid is poised to be influential across the country on the question of personal jurisdiction in such cases.

MacDermid also highlights the importance of an employer having clear and comprehensive documents addressing the protection of confidential information. In MacDermid, the employee signed an agreement advising her as to the location of her employer's servers, and agreed not to send information to her personal email accounts. In general, such provisions are rare, but an employer may wish to include them. In addition, a forum selection clause may have eliminated the need for such a jurisdictional fight in the first instance.

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is actively following developments around the country with respect to all aspects of trade secret law. The firm is available to assist companies, newly formed businesses, and investors with counseling and litigation regarding these issues. For more information, please contact Fred Alvarez, Ulrico Rosales, Marina Tsatalis, Laura Merritt, Charles Tait Graves, or another member of the firm's employment and trade secrets litigation practice.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.