Senate Bill 814 Proposes Sweeping and Retroactive Changes to Environmental Claims Handling in Oregon

by Cozen O'Connor

On March 13, 2013, the Oregon legislature introduced Senate Bill 814 to create sweeping reforms on environmental claims handling regulations and available remedies for insureds facing liability for cleanup of contaminated property located in the state. The proposed legislation would amend the existing Oregon Environmental Cleanup Assistance Act (OECAA) under ORS 465.479 and ORS 465.465 to impose stricter claims handling regulations, create a statutory cause of action for violations of the regulations, and allow punitive damages to be awarded if the court finds the insurer acted unreasonably. Because the OECAA provides that “Oregon law shall be applied in all cases where the contaminated property to which the action related is located within the State of Oregon,"1 the legislation has the potential to impact insurers even if the insured is located outside the state.

The bill, referred to as the 2013 Act, passed the Senate by a unanimous vote on April 10, 2013 and is currently with the House Committee on Consumer Protection and Government Efficiency. A public hearing will be held on May 9, 2013.  Every indication is that the 2013 Act will be passed in the House and will be signed into law in the near term. The 2013 Act purports to be retroactive, except in regard to “any environmental claim for which a final judgment, after exhaustion of all appeals, was entered before the effective date of this 2013 Act.” It will be effective upon passage.

The most notable provision of the 2013 Act is that it permits an insured aggrieved by one or more unfair environmental claims settlement practices to file suit to recover “the actual damages sustained, together with the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs.” Prior to commencing such an action, the insured must provide written notice of the basis for the cause of action to the insurer and office of the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services. The insurer then has 20 days to resolve the dispute. In any such action, the court may award uncapped treble damages if it finds the insurer acted unreasonably. Such an action must be brought within two years from the date the alleged violation is, or should have been, discovered.2 Because reasonableness is a subjective determination, insurers have little certainty whether even a technical violation of the unfair environmental claims settlement practices could subject them to punitive damages.

As currently proposed, the 2013 Act also includes the following key provisions:3

  • Prevents insurers from enforcing clauses in general liability insurance policies that require the insurer’s consent prior to an assignment of claims if the “losses or damages … commenced prior to the assignment.”
  • Specifies that an insurer’s violation of any provision of the existing ORS 465.479 (which outlines the procedure an insurer and insured must follow in the event of a lost policy) is not only an unfair claim settlement practice under ORS 746.230, but also an unfair environmental claims settlement practice under section 6 of the 2013 Act.
  • Defines additional “unfair environmental claims settlement practices,” to include:
    • Failure to commence an investigation within 15 working days of receiving notice of an environmental claim,
    • Failure to make “timely” payments for defense or indemnity costs,
    • Denying a claim for an improper purpose such as harassment, unnecessary delay or increased costs of litigation,
    • Requiring answers to repetitive questions and requests for information on matters unnecessary to the resolution of the environmental claim,
    • Failure to pay interest under the rates specified in ORS 82.010, and
    • Failure to participate in good faith in nonbinding mediation “concerning the existence, terms or conditions of a lost policy or regarding coverage for an environmental claim.” An insurer must have a representative “present, or available by telephone, with authority to settle the matter at all mediation sessions.”
  • Prevents insurers from enforcing non-cumulation clauses in a “long-tail environmental claim” (defined as an environmental claim covered by multiple general liability insurance policies), although the non-cumulation clause “may be a factor considered in the allocation of contribution claims between insurers.”

This provision, like the provision regarding assignment clauses, discussed above, may effectively rewrite existing policy language in certain circumstances. Although the legislative history states that rules set forth under the 2013 Act “do not apply if they are contrary to the parties’ mutual intent as shown by unambiguous policy terms,”4 in practice, insureds and insurers often disagree on whether a term is ambiguous. Thus, insurers may need to seek guidance from the courts in order to enforce policy language that is contrary to the language of the 2013 Act.

  • Clarifies that the release of a hazardous substance into Oregon state waters, or onto real property not owned by the insured, constitutes property damage. Also requires insurers to pay remedial actions costs incurred by the insured to “cut off a pathway by which a hazardous substance threatens to, or has, migrated, leached or otherwise been released” into Oregon state waters or real property not owned by the insured.

This provision is significant in that it treats preventative measures as indemnity costs. Although the legislative history indicates the intent is to ensure coverage for the “cost of removing the continuing source of the damage even if that source is on the insured’s property,”5 the text of the 2013 Act also refers to threatened releases. There will likely be ongoing debate as to whether a preventative measure was legitimately taken to prevent a release, or if it was simply a cost of doing business.

  • Specifies that, when more than one general liability policy is triggered for an environmental claim, an insurer that is obligated to pay may not fail to make payment to the insured on the grounds that another insurer has not yet made payment.
  • Creates a rebuttable presumption that all binding settlement agreements between an insurer and insured are made in good faith.
  • Specifies that contribution rights as defined in the 2013 Act preempt “all common law contribution rights, if any, by and between insurers for environmental claims.”

The above provisions are to encourage prompt payment and settlement of claims, and could impact an insurer’s ability to seek contribution from a settling insurer. They do not impact an excess insurer’s ability to require exhaustion of the underlying policy.

  • Requires an insurer to pay interest to the insured on amounts the insurer is legally obligated to pay as defense or indemnity if the insured is not reimbursed within 30 days of the date it requests reimbursement or makes payment, whichever is later.

This provision does not take into account the fact that an insured’s request for reimbursement may be the insurer’s first notice of the claim. Accordingly, an insurer may legitimately require more than 30 days to investigate the matter and determine whether the amount submitted for reimbursement is reasonable and appropriate — let alone covered under the policy.

  • Requires the insurer to provide independent counsel to defend the insured, “who shall represent only the insured and not the insurer,” if the general liability insurer is defending under a reservation of rights, or if the insured has potential liability in excess of the general liability policy limits.

Legislative history shows that this provision is intended “to address the problem of insurance companies hiring … defense counsel and environmental consultants without sufficient experience to defend insureds while at the same time reserving their right to deny coverage."6 It does not appear to require appointment of separate counsel, simply experienced and independent counsel.

To facilitate the mediation requirement, the 2013 Act also directs the attorney general to appoint a mediation service provider to operate a mediation program related to environmental claims, and requires an insurer to provide the insured with information concerning a nonbinding environmental claim mediation program upon request. The 2013 Act does not specify who is responsible for the costs of mediation. Complying with this procedure will likely impose additional costs on insurers and insureds alike.

The plain language of the 2013 Act, as well as the testimony presented to the Senate Committee on General Government, Consumer and Small Business Protection on March 22, 2013, shows that the intent of the legislation is to encourage insurers to promptly accept coverage and pay claims, in order to protect businesses that are faced with environmental liability and to facilitate the cleanup effort. In so doing, however, the 2013 Act effectively re-writes insurance policies by rendering certain clauses ineffective, imposes significant burden and expense on insurers by requiring nonbinding mediation, and creates uncertainty as to when punitive damages may be available. Finally, the retroactive application of the 2013 Act raises questions of constitutionality: insurers may be subject to punitive damages for actions taken before the 2013 Act is effective, and therefore before insurers could be on notice that such conduct is prohibited.

To protect themselves from future liability under the 2013 Act, insurers should take care to strictly comply with all claims handling regulations — both existing and proposed — in the state of Oregon. Insurers should be prepared to issue payments on claims immediately when due, regardless of whether other insurers may also have an obligation to contribute. Any contribution issues should be resolved after payment to the insured is made.

The foregoing summary of the 2013 Act is not exhaustive, but represents the most significant changes. Cozen O’Connor will continue to monitor the progress of the legislation and provide further updates as needed.

To discuss any questions you may have regarding the issues discussed in this Alert, or how they may apply to your particular circumstances, please contact Molly Eckman at 206.373.7229 or

[1] ORS 465.480(2)(a).

[2] This section of the 2013 Act closely follows the Insurance Fair Conduct Act (IFCA) that was enacted in Washington State in 2007, although the IFCA is not limited to environmental claims.

[3] The full text is available at

[4] Testimony of Joan Snyder (Snyder Testimony) in Support of 2013 Senate Bill 814 at 5 (March 22, 2013).

[5] Snyder Testimony at 6.

[6] Snyder Testimony at 8.


Written by:

Cozen O'Connor

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.