Skin in the Game: Is There Online Gambling in the World of eSports?

by Goodwin

Over a billion people around the world have caught eSports fever.  eSports, also known as electronic sports or competitive video gaming, describes a wide array of online games spanning from traditional sports games to multiplayer battle arena games to first-person shooter games, for which players use computer interfaces to compete. The popularity of eSports surged in the late 2000s and early 2010s, with millions of people competing worldwide. Two examples of eSports’ explosive popularity include a sell-out League of Legends Event at Madison Square Garden and TBS broadcasts of first person shooter video games.  And the popularity is paying dividends—the total global market was valued at $748 million in 2015, and the market is predicted to reach $1.9 billion by 2018.  In an effort to boost revenue and draw millennial crowds to their doors, casinos are now pivoting towards eSports contests, a notable shift from traditional gambling.

But explosive growth and popularity is often followed by increased legal scrutiny.  A recently filed lawsuit, McLeod v. Valve, has raised questions about whether certain eSports practices, namely “skin-betting,” i.e., users wagering in-game items on their own performance in eSports matches or on professional competitions, are lawful.  Although the plaintiff in the suit is unlikely to prevail, its mere existence should serve as a warning to operators about the pitfalls that could arise collaterally to eSports game development.

What Is Skin-Betting?

One of the most popular eSports games is Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (“CS:GO”), a first-person shooter video game made by Valve Corporation (“Valve”). Played by more than 380,000 people at any given time, CS:GO operates in short rounds that end when all players on one side are “dead” or a team’s objective is completed. Players purchase in-game items such as weapons and equipment at the beginning of every round with virtual money awarded based on performance in completing objectives. Valve created a platform called “Steam” which allows players to play games, communicate with other users, initiate trades of in-game items, list items for sale, buy games, buy items and participate in forum discussions.

Many players gamble with in-game items in a practice called “skin-betting.” Players stake skins—virtual weapons and other in-game items—on their performance.  “Steam” allows skin-betting to occur on third-party websites where skins are traded in for virtual currency, with at least one secondary market allowing for the conversion of skins to cold, hard cash.

McLeod v. Valve

On June 23, 2016, Michael McLeod filed a class action lawsuit against Valve in the District of Connecticut, alleging that the company is actively involved in the illegal skin-betting market, thereby promoting and profiting from illegal online gambling. McLeod claims that users deposit real money on Valve’s website in exchange for skins, connect the accounts with third-party websites directly associated with Valve where users can participate in illegal forms of gambling using skins, and ultimately cash out their account balances by converting skins into real money. McLeod contends Valve knows exactly what these sites are for and what users are doing, yet still affirmatively supports these transactions and receives income therefrom.

This theory of gambling is somewhat novel, but Valve has favorable case law on its side.  In Mason v. Machine Zone, 140 F. Supp. 3d 457 (D. Md. 2015), a federal judge rejected similar claims of illegal gambling predicated on secondary markets.  The Mason plaintiff never alleged that Machine Zone hosted or sanctioned these secondary markets, nor did she allege any credible real-world injury. The judge criticized the plaintiff’s complaint, arguing that “[p]erceived unfairness in the operation and outcome of a game, where there are no real world losses, harm, or injuries . . . cannot give rise to the award of a private monetary remedy by a real world court.”

Although there certainly are differences between Game of War and CS:GO (not to mention other eSports products), Mason will prove useful in defeating the McLeod plaintiff’s claim that Valve partook in illegal gambling because of its knowledge of the secondary market.  That said, Mason may not be entirely dispositive. The Mason court left open the possibility that proof of support for secondary markets and allegations of real-world injuries might be sufficient to state a claim. McLeod alleges Valve knowingly allows, supports, facilitates and even directly profits from third party websites in the skin-betting market, and repeatedly asserts that skins can be converted into real currency in the attempt to show he has experienced a real-world injury.

While the advent of skins (and the corresponding interest in the “skins” market) precipitated a sharp increase in CS:GO’s popularity, McLeod will have trouble proving Valve directly profits from skin-gambling sites, as users transfer skins to these sites using a free and permissible trade function. While McLeod has made broad claims of an unregulated market “ripe for scams, cheating, fraud and other harms,” he continues to have trouble alleging specific real world injuries that require, as the Mason court put it, “a private monetary remedy by a real world court.”  McLeod is unlikely to prevail in his lawsuit, but his case and Mason demonstrate that plaintiffs are becoming increasingly creative in trying to prove that eSports games, which are facially and obviously not gambling, are somehow illegal.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Goodwin on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.