Supreme Court Breaks Divide: Mere Retention Of Debtor Property Is Not A Stay Violation

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Contact

The United States Supreme Court has resolved a split among lower courts on the issue of whether a lessor who repossesses debtor collateral on eve of bankruptcy violates the automatic stay by failing to surrender such property immediately following the bankruptcy filing.

In City of Chicago, IL v. Fulton, 141 S.Ct. 585 (2021), the Court ruled unanimously that retaining possession of a debtor’s property after a bankruptcy filing is not an act to exercise control over the bankruptcy estate prohibited by the automatic stay. In the matter before the Court, individuals who had filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy petitions requested that the City return their vehicles, which had been impounded prior to the bankruptcy cases for failure to pay motor vehicle fines. The Court reversed the lower courts’ rulings, which had found that the City’s refusal to return the vehicles violated the automatic stay.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Contact
more
less

Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide