Supreme Court Hears Case that May Fundamentally Change the Rules – Are You Ready for Potential Sales Tax Turmoil?

by Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

On April 18, 2018 the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in South Dakota v. Wayfair – a case that could fundamentally change the rules governing when a state may impose sales or use tax collection responsibilities on a retailer. For over 50 years, decisions from the Supreme Court protected retailers that do not have a “physical presence” in the state from collecting tax on sales made to customers in that state. That may be about to change. If the Supreme Court eliminates the physical presence standard, retailers nationwide may be required to collect tax on their sales to all states. Is your business ready?

History of the Case

The Physical Presence Requirement. Since 1967, retailers have been protected from sales or use tax collection obligations by what is now known as the “physical presence requirement.” This requirement was first applied in National Bellas Hess, where the Supreme Court invalidated an attempt by the State of Illinois to impose use tax on an out-of-state retailer whose only connection with customers in Illinois was by common carrier or by the United States mail. In 1992, the Court reaffirmed the rule announced in National Bellas Hess in Quill v. North Dakota largely on stare decisis grounds. The Court held that, under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, a state may not impose a use tax on a retailer with no physical presence in that state. Importantly, the Court stated it might not have reached the same result were the question before it for the first time.

The “Kill Quill” Movement. In 2015, Justice Kennedy authored a concurring opinion in Direct Marketing v. Brohl in which he called for a reconsideration of Quill. Since then, many states including South Dakota have enacted laws aimed at generating a legal challenge to the physical presence standard of Bellas Hess and Quill. Many brick and mortar retail establishments have joined the call to overrule Quill on the grounds that it creates an unfair commercial advantage.

South Dakota’s Law. In March of 2016, South Dakota enacted a law which requires retailers with no physical presence in the state to collect sales tax if they have $100,000 or more in sales to South Dakota residents or 200 or more deliveries into the state. As expected, it drew an immediate challenge and reached the state’s highest court. The South Dakota Supreme Court held the law was unconstitutional under Quill.

Observations from Oral Argument

  • The first question for South Dakota came from Justice Sotomayor who wanted to know why the states could not simply collect use taxes from consumers. She stated that South Dakota’s position raised a host of questions, including how much contact is enough to trigger a tax obligation. Later, however, Justice Ginsburg observed that it was much more efficient for the states to collect sales tax from sellers rather than use tax from consumers. ​
  • Several of the Justices asked why the Court should not leave the matter to Congress. According to Justice Kagan, the fact that Congress had not acted “for 25 plus years” on this issue gives the Court “reason to pause” and raises the bar for South Dakota to prevail. Later, Justice Kagan added, “Congress . . . can craft a compromise in ways that we cannot.” Justice Sotomayor asked counsel for taxpayers whether there was anything the Court could do to signal to Congress “that it should act more affirmatively in this area.” Chief Justice Roberts countered that perhaps Congress has made a decision, a decision to leave the law the way it has been for 25 years. Justice Ginsburg then remarked that if the Court were responsible for Bellas Hess, why shouldn’t the Court take responsibility, mentioning the strong dissent in Quill and Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in Direct Marketing.
  • Questioning counsel for taxpayers, Justice Ginsburg suggested that, rather than resulting in discrimination, a decision overruling Quill would result in equality among sellers. Justice Breyer pressed taxpayer’s counsel on the point, asking why the Court should favor one particular business model over another.

Are You Ready for Wayfair?

  • If the Court eliminates the physical presence standard in Wayfair the biggest questions are:
    • What will be the new standard – if any?
    • Will it be applied uniformly by the states?
    • Will it be applied retroactively?
  • ​If the Court overrules Quill and does not announce a new uniform standard binding on all the states, chaos may ensue. Each one of the states that imposes a sales or use tax could seek to create its own standard, and retailers could be required to comply with a multitude of varying tax regimes. More troublesome, if the Court is silent on the question of retroactivity, some states may seek to impose significant retroactive liabilities.​​​​​ ​
  • A decision is expected by the end of June.​​ ​
  • In anticipation of Wayfair, your business should begin considering:
    • Its level of exposure to state sales or use tax liability if the physical presence standard is eliminated, including retroactive liability
    • Whether existing software and systems are sufficient to begin accurately collecting and accounting for sales or use tax in a post Quill world

Stay tuned for additional information from Parker Poe’s SALT team on additional developments in Wayfair and how it may affect your business.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.