Supreme Court Rejects Class Action Plaintiff’s Effort to Avoid Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA

by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

In a unanimous decision issued on March 19, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the named plaintiff in a proposed class action lawsuit cannot defeat federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA or the Act) by filing a pre-certification stipulation that he and the class will seek, in the aggregate, less than $5 million in damages. The decision is the Court’s first under CAFA since the Act became law in 2005. Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles, No. 11-1450, 568 U.S. __ (2013).

Factual Background

The named plaintiff in the case, Greg Knowles, filed his class action complaint against Standard Fire Insurance Company in Arkansas state court in April 2011, after suffering property damage in a 2010 hailstorm. He alleged that Standard had underpaid claims for property damage that he and other covered Arkansas homeowners had incurred by refusing to pay charges associated with their retention of general contractors to repair damage that they had suffered. In an apparent effort to avoid federal jurisdiction, Knowles alleged only state law claims, limited his definition of the class to residents of Arkansas, and asserted both that no individual class member’s claim exceeded $75,000 and that the aggregated damages of all class members did not exceed $5 million. In addition, Knowles stipulated (in the complaint itself and in a stipulation attached to it) that he would not seek damages exceeding $75,000 for any class member and that he would not seek class damages in excess of $5 million.

Standard removed the case to federal court under CAFA, and Knowles responded by filing a motion to remand on the ground that the necessary amount in controversy had not been met. The district court found that the sum or value of the amount in controversy would, in the absence of Knowles’s stipulation, have fallen just above CAFA’s $5 million threshold. In light of the stipulation, however, the court concluded that the amount in controversy fell beneath the threshold, and it therefore granted the motion to remand. Standard filed a petition for permission to appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which the court of appeals denied, prompting Standard to file a petition for certiorari. The U.S. Supreme Court granted Standard’s petition on August 31, 2012 and heard argument on January 7, 2013.

Legal Analysis

Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for a unanimous Court, reasoned that the district court’s task under CAFA is “to determine whether it has jurisdiction by adding up the value of the claim of each person who falls within the definition of [the] proposed class and determine whether the resulting sum exceeds $5 million.” Here, the Court noted, the district court had performed that task and had determined that “the resulting sum would have exceeded $5 million but for the stipulation.” (emphasis in original). Accordingly, the issue before the Court was “whether the stipulation makes a critical difference.”

The Court held that Knowles’s stipulation did not make a critical difference for the simple reason that, in order to be effective, “[s]tipulations must be binding”—and while Knowles’s pre-certification stipulation was binding on him, it was not binding on “those he purports to represent.” As the Court observed, a plaintiff who files a proposed class action cannot legally bind members of the proposed class until the class is certified. And since federal removal jurisdiction is determined by “examining the case ‘as of the time it was filed in state court’”—at which point no class had been certified—the district court had been wrong to conclude that Knowles’s stipulation “could overcome its finding that the CAFA jurisdictional threshold had been met.

In reaching this conclusion, the Court distinguished the many cases in which individual plaintiffs have been permitted to avoid removal to federal court and to obtain a remand to state court by stipulating to amounts in controversy that fall below the federal jurisdictional requirement. As the Court observed, the stipulations in those cases differed from Knowles’s stipulation in that they were “legally binding on all plaintiffs.” Because Knowles could not bind the absent class members, that “essential feature is missing here”—thus rendering his stipulation ineffective to defeat federal jurisdiction.

Practical Impact

The Standard Fire case did not arise in an employment context, but the Court’s resolution of it is likely to benefit employers who are potential class action defendants. Class action plaintiffs tend to prefer state courts and thus often try to defeat federal jurisdiction—as Knowles attempted to do in the Standard Fire case. The Court’s ruling here that pre-certification stipulations cannot defeat federal jurisdiction removes an arrow from the quiver of class action plaintiffs seeking to avoid federal court and therefore benefits class action defendants.


Written by:

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.