Possible application of Section 101(22)(A) to safe harbor’s covered entity requirement raises important questions for future transferee defendants.

Key Points:

..Merit Management raises the possibility that customers of “financial institutions” may qualify for protection under Section 546(e) safe harbor even if they would not otherwise meet Section 546(e)’s covered entity requirement.

..Treating customers of “financial institutions” as covered entities could broaden the scope of safe harbor.

..Further analysis of Merit Management is available in the New York Law Journal article “Safe Harbor After ‘Merit Management.’”