The Dynamex Decision Is Retroactive (For Now)

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Contact

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

The Dynamex decision and the passage of AB 5 has led to confusion about the applicable standard to use for determining whether a worker is misclassified as an independent contractor. That did not stop the Second Appellate Court in Gonzales v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc., from holding that the ABC test set forth in Dynamex is retroactive.

On October 8, 2019, the Court of Appeals for California’s Second Appellate District in Gonzales v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc., ordered the trial court to reconsider its denial of class certification of a proposed class of allegedly misclassified drivers because the appeal was pending when the Dynamex decision was issued.

See our prior advisories on the Dynamex decision here and here, and our prior advisory on the passage of AB 5 here.

The Gonzales court held that: the "ABC test adopted in Dynamex is retroactively applicable to pending litigation" asserting wage order violations and Labor Code violations based on wage orders; and it applies to Labor Code claims that are either "rooted in one or more wage orders, or predicated on conduct alleged in one or more wage orders."

For other Labor Code claims not rooted or predicated in a wage order, the proper standard is the Borello test, which looks to multiple factors and focuses on control of the manner and means to complete the work.

Whether the California Supreme Court will weigh in and address the question certified by the Ninth Circuit in Vasquezi.e., whether the ABC test set forth in the Dynamex decision applies retroactively to claims covering the time period prior to April 2018 – remains uncertain.

See our prior advisory on this here.

Assuming the California Supreme Court does review Vasquez, it may review the Gonzales decision in conjunction. Until then, Gonzales is binding authority on retroactive application of the ABC test.

The Gonzales decision may continue the uptick in filing of wage-hour class action lawsuits. The decision brings more clarity as to the applicable legal standard to use when considering potential exposure for independent contractor misclassification, and for making decisions about compensation and classification practices. Employers should continue to consult with experienced California employment legal counsel in doing so.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Contact
more
less

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.