The FTC, Like, Revises Its Social Media Endorsement Guides, Bruh!

by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition
Contact

This month, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued a revised version of “Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking,” a series of questions and answers pertaining to the conduct of “influencers,” that is, anyone who endorses a product or service. The basic premise of the Endorsement Guides is that, if there exists a material connection between the influencer who is endorsing the product and the company that is marketing the product (e.g., a payment, a free sample, a family connection, etc.), that connection must be disclosed. If the connection is not adequately disclosed, consumers might give the endorsement more credence than they would have given it otherwise, and the endorsement is considered by the FTC to be a deceptive business practice in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Most of the updates to the Endorsement Guides involve social media influencers. Perhaps to drive that point home, the FTC simultaneously announced its first-ever complaint (and proposed settlement) against individual social media influencers, specifically Trevor Martin and Thomas Cassell, two officers/owners of the gambling site CSGO lotto. Martin and Cassell allegedly presided over a promotional campaign in which influencers were paid to promote the site on YouTube, Twitch, Twitter and Facebook, but these promotions were not accompanied by adequate disclosures. This included posts by the owners themselves. In one tweet, Cassell failed to disclose his ownership stake in CSGO and wrote:

Bruh… i’ve won like $8,000 worth of CS:GO Skins today on @CSGOLotto I cannot even believe it!

The FTC responded to Martin and Cassell thusly:

Well, Bruhs, while we’re on the subject of things we cannot even believe, did either of you like consider clearly disclosing that you like owned the company – a material connection requiring disclosure under FTC Law?

Did the FTC really say that?  Yes — on their website, at least — courtesy of the incomparable Lesley Fair. The FTC also issued a more formal response, filing a three-count complaint alleging violations of Section 5(a), specifically for a “False Claim of Independent Reviews,” “Deceptive Failure to Disclose Endorsers Were Owners and Officers” and “Deceptive Failure to Disclose Endorsers were Paid.” The proposed settlement, open for public comment until October 10, 2017, will require Martin and Cassel to establish a monitoring and review system to ensure that future paid endorsements are accompanied by clear and conspicuous disclosures.

Revised Endorsement Guidance

The revised Endorsement Guides included well over twenty additions, edits and updates. Here is our rundown of the substantive social media-related revisions:

  • Instagram Tag Endorsements: Let’s say you are a D-list social media celebrity. You post a picture of yourself on Instagram wearing some designer sunglasses. You don’t say anything about the sunglasses in the description, but you do include a tag of the designer’s brand name. Is that alone really an endorsement?  Yes, says the FTC – if you have any material connection to the product marketer, the connection needs to be disclosed, for example, by starting the description with “AD” or “#AD.”
  • Where does the disclosure go? The revised Endorsement Guides also contain some specific advice about the placement of disclosures on social media. This includes:
    • Previous FTC literature has recommended that a good disclosure may include placing “#AD” at the beginning of a paid social media post. The revised Endorsement Guides clarify that this placement is not an absolute requirement; the important thing is that the disclosure is easily noticed, which is more likely at the beginning than at the end of a post. Note that the FTC advises against incorporating “AD” into a larger hashtag, because such a disclosure might not be noticed at all
    • Instagram may truncate descriptions more than four lines long, so that if a user wants to see the rest of the description, he or she has to hit the “more” button. The FTC wants those disclosures “above the fold” in the first few lines, so they are seen by all consumers, not just those who bother to click “more.”
    • If your endorsement is in a blog, the FTC frowns on shoving the disclosure towards the bottom of the page or even hidden somewhere way at the top. It is recommended that the disclosure being “placed where it easily catches” attention, ideally somewhere near the endorsement it is qualifying.
  • No “Thank You”! Earlier this year, the FTC sent about ninety “educational” letters to social media influencers reminding them of the Endorsement Guides and cautioning them over what may have been inadequate disclosures. Many of those letters concerned posts where the influencer simply said “Thanks” to a brand instead of adequately disclosing what the thanks was for (e.g., thanks for the $5,000 check, or thanks for the free sample). The revised Endorsement Guides specifically state that saying “thanks” to a brand is not a sufficient disclosure of a material connection. Note that some of those ninety social media influencers may not have gotten the memo because, on the same day the FTC announced the revised Endorsement Guide, it also announced that it had followed up with twenty of these influencers, asking for a response with specific information about their connections to the brands they have been endorsing online.
  • Ambiguous Hashtags: Other ambiguous words that may not be adequate disclosures of a material connection include “#client,” “#advisor,” “#ambassador” and “#consultant.” On the other hand, stating that “XYZ Company asked me to try their product” may be sufficient depending on the circumstances.
  • But you said Facebook “likes” weren’t a problem! Well, yes, the FTC did sort of say that once, but this language has changed. As background, let’s say you promise to give customers a coupon for 10% off their sunglasses if they “like” your Facebook page (otherwise known as a “like-gated” promotion). Do you need to tell consumers to disclose their receipt of the coupon along with the “like,” and how exactly would they do that? A “like” is a binary exercise: you either press the “like” button or you do not, and Facebook doesn’t offer a space for explaining why you pressed the “like” button. Because there is no practical way to disclose the reason for a “liking” a page, both the FTC and the National Advertising Division (a self-regulating organization of the advertising industry) have been more or less agnostic on the issue. Indeed, the prior version of the FTC Endorsement Guides stated that, because it was not clear if anyone was putting any stock in these “likes,” “the failure to disclose that the people giving “likes” received an incentive might not be a problem.” In the newly revised Endorsement Guides, however, this language has been deleted and replaced with a warning that: “whether the Commission may take action would depend on the overall impression, including whether consumers take “likes” to be material in their decision.” We asked the FTC about this update during one of its live Twitter chats last week, and the FTC stated that its enforcement policy has not changed, despite this new language. That may be the case, but we have a feeling that this is not going to be the last word on the subject. As the saying goes, “Watch this space!”
  • Employee social media posts. The revised Endorsement Guides also offer a framework for determining whether an employee can use his or her personal social media account to “like” or “share” a company’s post. If the post being liked or shared is considered to be an “advertisement” by the company, than a disclosure of the employment relationship is required. If the post is just being shared by the employee, a disclosure is easy as a practical matter: just include a note saying something like “Check out my company’s new product…” or include a hashtag such as “#XYZEmployee,” which the FTC says may be sufficient depending on the context. But if you are just “liking” your employer’s post, where do you put the disclosure? The FTC doesn’t offer any answer except: “see what we said above about ‘likes’.” Since the FTC repeated itself, so will we: Watch this space!
  • Can I rely on the social media platform to do it for me? Some social media platforms are now including a built-in tool that offers automatic formatting for the disclosure of paid endorsements. If you use one of these tools, are you complying with FTC guidance? Long story short – it depends.  If the tool creates a clear and conspicuous disclosure, then the FTC is happy. But if the tool stinks, so does your disclosure, and you (the endorser) are responsible. To learn about one of these tools, see this blog post about Instagram “paid partnership” tagging.
  • Time-limited “story” posts. “Stories” (a feature originated on Snapchat and later also incorporated by Instagram; see here for more info) are photos or videos broadcast to followers or friends for a limited period, usually twenty-four hours, after which they disappear. The revised Endorsement Guides warn that if a “story” is a paid endorsement, there must be a disclosure (superimposition of the disclosure over the image is recommended), and the same rules apply regarding the disclosure having to be clear and conspicuous. Notably, since a “story” can feature both video and audio, you can’t stick the disclosure in the audio only because not everyone turns on the sound.
  • Solicited Endorsements. Other new guidance appears to be directed at consumer review programs that were designed to avoid disclosures. For example, the Endorsement Guides indicate that some reviewers are apparently being told that if they disclose a material connection on one review site, they don’t have to do it on other sites. The Endorsement Guides debunk this incorrect advice, and also address various mechanisms that some marketers may be employing to compensate reviewers without disclosing the compensation (e.g., indirectly distributed discount codes to consumers who are not “required” to review the product).  The bottom line is that disclosures are generally required.

You can read the full Endorsement Guides on the FTC website here.  Since the FTC didn’t publish a list of the recent revisions to the Endorsement Guides, we created a redline comparison showing the changes since the prior version, which you can access here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition
Contact
more
less

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.