The Lesser of Two Evils? Court Holds that Statutory Measure of Recovery Under a Mechanic’s Liens Is the Lesser of Reasonable Value of Services and Materials Furnished or Contract Price

by Miller Starr Regalia

In Appel v. Superior Court (No. B244590, 3/11/13), California’s Second District Court of Appeal held that the proper measure of a mechanic’s lien claim is the lesser of the reasonable value of the services and materials provided, or the contract price, even where the person defending against the mechanic’s lien claim was not a party to the contract. This decision helps clarify how mechanics lien claims are to be evaluated and quantified, which should be of interest to underwriters, claims counsel, and litigators handling construction cases.

Factual and Procedural Background

Wilshire Landmark, a developer, and Webcor Construction, a contractor, entered into an agreement to construct a condominium project in Los Angeles for a total of $65.5 million. As construction went forward, Wilshire and Webcor agreed to change orders increasing the contract price to $81 million. Upon completion of the project, however, Webcor claimed an additional $13.5 million for further approved changes and recorded a mechanic’s lien against the property.  Webcor then filed a lawsuit to foreclose on its lien. As the condominiums had been sold by that time, the unit owners were included as defendants to the action.

Wilshire and Webcor entered into a settlement agreement shortly before trial, including a $32 million stipulated judgment and change order increasing the final contract price to $95.5 million. However, as Wilshire was a single-asset entity, it was basically judgment proof after having sold the condominiums. Thus, Webcor proceeded against the unit owners, claiming that the settlement should establish the contract price for purposes of its mechanic’s lien claim under former Civil Code section 3123(a). Section 3123(a) establishes that a mechanic’s lien claimant may recover “the reasonable value of the services or materials furnished or for the price agreed upon by the claimant and the person with whom he or she contracted, whichever is less.” Webcor also argued that the unit owners should not be permitted to raise contract-based defenses to its claims because the unit owners were not parties to the construction agreement. Essentially, Webcor argued that the measure of damages for its claim either had to be established by the final change order under its settlement with Wilshire or should be based on the “reasonable value” of its improvements to the property, without regard to the terms of the construction agreement.

Relying on language in ECC Construction v. Ganson (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 572, the trial court agreed with Webcor on the second point, issuing a pretrial in limine order to the effect that the contract and final change order were not relevant to the mechanic’s lien claim, which would be measured solely under the “reasonable value” standard.

Because this ruling appeared to depart from the language of section 3123(a) while depriving the unit owners of the ability to raise pertinent contract-based defenses to Webcor’s claim, they filed a petition for a writ of mandate with the Second District Court of Appeal. The Second District responded by issuing an order staying the proceedings in the trial court and an order to show cause, requiring Webcor to submit a brief in response to the owners’ arguments.

The Court of Appeal Issues Its Ruling Granting the Petition

The court of appeal issued its published opinion in the case on March 11. It ruled against Webcor, holding that the trial court had misinterpreted section 3123. The court relied primarily on the plain language of section 3123(a), noting, “The statutory language includes no limitation that renders the [contractual] measure of value inapplicable when the claimant is attempting to enforce the lien against a property owner who was not a party to the contract for work.” The court also discussed the fact that the trial court’s interpretation would conflict with former Civil Code section 3140, which limits a contractor’s recovery to “only such amount as may be due him according to the terms of his contract.” The court also carefully examined the language from the ECC Construction case upon which the trial court had founded its ruling, finding it to be unnecessary to that case’s disposition and thus dicta that need not be followed. The court concluded its decision by cautioning that the terms of the Webcor-Wilshire settlement should not automatically be applied to the contract price for purposes of determining the amount of Webcor’s recovery. While the court declined to issue a ruling on this question, it echoed the skepticism of the trial court that the settlement between the judgment proof Wilshire and Webcor could be insulated from attacks of collusion or lack of good faith.

The Takeaway

So what does Appel have to offer the title practitioner? The case touches on a number of issues for those litigating in this field. It is a good example of the strategic use of an extraordinary writ to challenge a highly prejudicial ruling in the trial court. The decision itself also offers a certain degree of stability and predictability in the litigation of mechanics’ lien claims, which will hopefully simplify litigation and make cases more amenable to settlement. It also demonstrates that those who are not party to a construction contract can still rely on its terms in establishing defenses to a mechanic’s lien claim.

For those in the title business, the case reaffirms how crucial the construction contract is in underwriting mechanics’ lien risks and in handling mechanics’ lien claims. The rule announced by Appel will hopefully make the jobs of underwriters and claims personnel a little easier. As messy as mechanic’s lien cases can get, gaining additional clarity in this field is always a welcome development.

As a final note, practitioners should be aware that the mechanic’s lien law has been revised and reorganized since Webcor recorded its liens, so the relevant statute is now Civil Code section 8430 rather than 3123.

Written by:

Miller Starr Regalia

Miller Starr Regalia on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.