The SEC and the Conflict Minerals Rule: What You Need to Know about the Latest Developments

by Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility

It is clear that Michael Piwowar, Acting Chairman of the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is not a fan of the conflict minerals rule. Earlier this month, the Acting Chairman and the Division of Corporation Finance released two statements regarding rule, both of which clearly state that the regulation will not be an enforcement priority.

By way of background, the statements were published after long-running litigation regarding the conflict minerals rule finally reached a formal conclusion. On April 3, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. SEC. The District Court’s action followed a August 2015 decision by D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals striking down the portion of the rule that required companies to declare certain products “not DRC conflict free” in their SEC filings. The appellate court had determined that that aspect of the rule violated the First Amendment.

The District Court’s final judgment remanded the case to the SEC. One of the questions now before the Commission is whether the “not DRC conflict free” description was required only by the rule, as issued by the SEC in August 2012, or whether that requirement originated in the original statutory language, Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010.

Statement from the Division of Corporation Finance

After the District Court’s judgment was issued, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a statement on April 7 noting that the “court’s remand has now presented significant issues for the Commission to address.” The statement also noted its receipt of several comments on the rule in response to the call for comments issued by the Acting Chairman on January 31. Notably, in that call for comments, the Acting Chairman had referred to the rule as “misguided.”

In light of the need to consider both the issues raised by the judicial determinations, and the comments recently submitted, the Division of Corporation Finance stated that it “will not recommend enforcement actions” if companies only file the required Form SD and don’t include a full Conflict Minerals Report in their upcoming filings, due on May 31, 2017.

Statement from Acting Chairman Michael Piwowar

The statement by the Division of Corporation Finance was followed by a statement from the Acting Chairman. In the statement, Acting Chairman Piwowar noted the uncertainties that remained after the courts’ decisions and reported that he has instructed SEC staff to begin working on a recommendation with regard to the conflict minerals rule.

Most notably, Acting Chairman also observed that the “primary function of the extensive and costly requirements for due diligence on the source and chain of custody of conflict minerals” that are the basis of a standard Conflict Minerals Report “is to enable companies to make the disclosure found to be unconstitutional.” He concluded by stating that “in light of the foregoing regulatory uncertainties, until these issues are resolved, it is difficult to conceive of a circumstance that would counsel in favor of enforcing” the requirement to prepare a full Conflict Minerals Report, as required by Item 1.01(c) of Form SD.

The statement from the Acting Chairman immediately prompted a strong retort from Democratic Commissioner Kara Stein, who argued that Piwowar’s actions were unprecedented and reflected an attempt to engage in “de facto rulemaking” that “represents a troubling attack not only on the Commission process, but also on the restraints of government power.” The Acting Chairman’s previous statements regarding the rule had already prompted a call from Senate Democrats for an investigation by the SEC’s Office of the Inspector General.

What now?

What are companies left to do at this point? For most companies, the latest statements will most likely not have significant impact on internal compliance efforts with regard to the upcoming filing, as most efforts will have largely been completed by this point.

In light of the fact that failure to file a Conflict Minerals Report describing due diligence efforts is not likely to lead to enforcement action, companies subject to filing requirements need to determine whether to include the exhibit with the Form SD, if a full Conflict Minerals Report would have normally have been required. Companies could choose to limit their disclosure to a Form SD and a description of their reasonable country of origin inquiry. This may prompt questions from stakeholders, including socially responsible investors and NGOs, as to why a company has chosen not to disclose its full due diligence efforts. For many companies, such stakeholder considerations are likely to be a determining factor for this year’s filings, especially in this time of considerable uncertainty.

Looking ahead to next year’s filings, companies can only hope for greater clarity as they determine how best to allocate compliance resources. Unfortunately, such clarity is not likely to be immediately forthcoming.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility

Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.