Three Point Shot - March 2018

by Proskauer Rose LLP
Contact

Proskauer Rose LLP

Can a High School Football Coach Say a Hail Mary after a Hail Mary?

High school football coach Joseph Kennedy was not instructing his quarterback to take a knee in victory formation to run down the clock. Instead, in an off-the-field contest far from the gridiron, he was asking the court for a preliminary injunction that would allow him to take a knee and pray on the fifty-yard line, in view of students and parents, immediately following games under Friday night lights. The Ninth Circuit denied Coach Joseph Kennedy's bid for an en banc rehearing in January, after a previous panel affirmed the denial of his injunction request. (Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist., No. 16-35801 (9th Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)).

Joseph Kennedy was an assistant varsity and head junior varsity football coach at Bremerton High School (BHS) from 2008 to 2015. BHS is located in Kitsap County, Washington, and is part of the Bremerton School District (the "District"). Coach Kennedy, a practicing Christian, felt compelled by his religious beliefs to give thanks through prayer at the end of each football game for the players' accomplishments and competitiveness. After shaking hands with the opponent, Kennedy would take a knee at "the fifty-yard line [to] offer a brief, quiet prayer of Thanksgiving" for about 30 seconds, establishing somewhat of a ritual that was performed over his many coaching years at BHS. A few games into his first season, he says players asked if they could join, to which he responded, "This is a free country. You can do what you want." Over time, the practice evolved into a platform for a motivational speech that included some traditional Christian terminology. Students, coaches and other attendees from both teams were invited to participate, and by 2015 the group grew to include the majority of the team (though players noted participation was not compelled).

The District first learned of the post-game prayer in September 2015, whereupon it passed Coach Kennedy a letter to clarify its employee expectations and inform the Coach that his activities would likely be found to violate the Establishment Clause. The letter acknowledged Coach Kennedy's actions were well-intentioned, but that the District's policies prohibited staff during school events from taking "any action likely to be perceived by a reasonable observer" that endorsed religious activity in order to avoid exposing the District to potential liability. Coach Kennedy complied with these policies until October 2015, 

whereupon he requested a religious accommodation under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, suggesting his religious expression occurred during "non-instructional hours" after the games ended. At this time, Coach Kennedy resumed his fifty-yard line prayer immediately following BHS's game on October 16, 2015.

Subsequently, the District sent a follow-up letter to Coach Kennedy noting that, while it did not prohibit prayer while employees are on the job, "such exercise must not interfere with the performance of job responsibilities, and must not lead to a perception of District endorsement of religion." The letter further stated that the football field is not an open forum, and reminded Kennedy he has post-game job responsibilities, which include supervision of players. Finally, the District offered Coach Kennedy a religious accommodation, by offering "a private location within the school building, athletic facility or press box" for a brief religious exercise at the conclusion of games. Coach Kennedy took his final knee on October 26th, 2015. On October 28th, he was placed on paid administrative leave. Coach Kennedy left the football program at the conclusion of the 2015 season and did not apply for a coaching position during the 2016 season.

Instead, Coach Kennedy brought suit in the Western District of Washington in August 2016, claiming his rights under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were violated. He then moved for a preliminary injunction barring the District from violating his rights in regards to the on-the-field prayer and reinstating him as a BHS football coach. The district court denied the request, holding that Kennedy was unlikely to prevail on the merits of his First Amendment retaliation claim because he spoke as a public employee and the District's conduct was justified to avoid violating the Establishment Clause. Coach Kennedy subsequently appealed to the Ninth Circuit. For a successful First Amendment appeal, he had to satisfy a multi-factor test and show, among other things, that he spoke as a private citizen rather than a public employee. Failing to prove any of the factors would stymie Coach Kennedy's comeback coaching bid.

The Ninth Circuit, in August 2017, held Coach Kennedy spoke as a public employee, not as a private citizen, because, among other things, the speech at issue was directed at least in part to the students and spectators, and was not merely an individual religious expression. (Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist., 869 F.3d 813 (9th Cir. 2017)). As such, the court found that Coach Kennedy could not show a likelihood of success on the merits of his First Amendment retaliation claim, ensuring his prayer for injunctive relief would not be answered.

Diving into the X's and O's, the appeals court found that Coach Kennedy's speech was unprotected because his demonstrative religious communication fell within the scope of his professional responsibilities. The court pointed to three facts that demonstrated he spoke as a public employee and not a private citizen. First, he acted as a teacher (or coach) at a school function, in the presence of students. Second, his speech "owed its existence" to his position as an educator; he only had special access to the fifty-yard line following games because of his paid position as a coach. Third, Coach Kennedy's prayer celebrated sportsmanship, so the content of the speech arguably was part of his "curriculum" as a coach. The court noted that ultimately, when Coach Kennedy knelt and prayed on the fifty-yard line in view of students and parents, he spoke as a public employee, not as a private citizen, and his speech therefore was constitutionally unprotected. As Judge Smith summed up in his concurring opinion: "Striking an appropriate balance between ensuring the right to free speech and avoiding the endorsement of a state religion has never been easy."

Any coach out there looking to enforce their own Friday Night Rights should note Coach Kennedy is not an unsympathetic character. He is a former Marine who served 20 years, including in operations Desert Storm and Desert Shield Iraq. He has stated that while he may not know the Constitution like his team's playbook, he "spent [his] years defending it." Additionally, Coach Kennedy has a Facebook page dedicated to his support with over 20,000 followers. There is still a chance he may be able to push the argument into overtime, however. There are at least some judicial scouts who believe Coach Kennedy may be pleading his case before the Supreme Court one day, and his lawyers have already indicated he is considering taking this case to a higher court.

Nautilus Scores $1.8 Million Win Without Breaking Too Much of a Sweat

Elliptical machines are touted in the fitness industry because they are "low-impact" cardio machines.  However, an elliptical machine patent caused ICON Health & Fitness Inc. ("ICON") to suffer a painful cramp after a Texas federal judge ruled that, under the terms of a license agreement, the exercise equipment maker Nautilus, Inc. ("Nautilus") was owed $1.8 million in royalties because ICON's shipping of elliptical component parts and assembly instructions from China necessarily infringed on Nautilus's Chinese patent and constituted a "Product" under the agreement that required payment. (Nautilus, Inc. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., No. SA-16-CV-00080-RCL (W.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2018)).

In 2004, Nautilus and ICON entered into a patent licensing agreement (which was subsequently amended several times by the parties) in which ICON received a non-exclusive license to some of Nautilus's patents in exchange for ICON agreeing to pay Nautilus a five percent (5%) royalty on the gross sales of all products manufactured and sold by ICON that incorporated any of Nautilus's patents.  Some of the patents were U.S. patents, while others were foreign patents.  The arrangement seemed to run well, but then on January 25, 2015, all of the patents expired, except for one of Nautilus's Chinese patents.

After the expiration of the U.S. patents, ICON continued to manufacture the ellipticals in China, but the ellipticals were shipped unassembled, along with instructions for U.S. purchasers to complete assembly.  ICON initially paid royalties on the portion of these sales. However, in December 2015, ICON dialed up the resistance and took the position that the manufactured-but-unassembled ellipticals sold to U.S. customers did not qualify as "Products" under the licensing agreement, so it stopped making royalty payments.

The contract at issue defines "Products," in part, as "any apparatus, system or products covered by at least one Claim of any of Licensor's Patent Rights." ICON contended that the license agreement's definition of "Products" incorporates the doctrine of patent infringement and that the unassembled ellipticals do not infringe the Chinese patent. Unsurprisingly, Nautilus disagreed and demanded royalty payments.  After the parties couldn't work out their disagreements, Nautilus quickened its stride and filed suit.

In the court's view, the incorporation of "Patent Rights" into the definition of "Products" in the agreement only makes sense if the phrase "covered by" means "infringing."  Thus, the court set out to determine whether the products at issue – that is, the component parts and assembly instructions for ICON ellipticals that are packaged, but not assembled, in China and then exported – would have constituted infringing articles under Chinese patent law. If ICON's products were determined to infringe on Nautilus's Chinese patent, then ICON was required to pay royalties on sales prior to the expiration of the patent.  After hearing both sides' expert reports and examining the basics of Chinese patent law, the court found that ICON's products infringed on Nautilus's Chinese patent.  It rejected ICON's argument that infringement under Chinese law could only occur by actually assembling the ellipticals in their entirety in China, concluding that the inclusion of final assembly instructions, with all of the necessary component parts, is "equivalent to actual assembly for purposes of practicing the Chinese patent."  Thus, because the disputed ICON ellipticals infringe on the Chinese patent, they are "Products" under the contract and ICON was required to pay royalties on the sales of those products.

In the end, the court ordered that ICON pay around $1.8 million in royalties and interest to Nautilus for sales that occurred prior to the Chinese patent's expiration.  Further, the court allowed Nautilus to file a separate petition for attorneys' fees and costs.  Despite having to brief the court on questions of Chinese patent law, it seems that Nautilus did not have to burn too many calories during its summary judgment victory, winning this dispute without breaking too much of a sweat. 

"Spaceman" Seeks to Pitch a Shutout in Trademark Dispute with The Sporting Times

With the start of baseball season upon us, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios ("MGM") and its codefendants, fresh off a victory in a trademark infringement suit, are lacing up their cleats again and are now seeking attorney's fees for what they describe as an "exceptionally meritless" lawsuit involving a photo montage in a 2016 biopic about former Red Sox lefthander Bill "Spaceman" Lee. We last followed this legal dispute in the June 2017 edition of this newsletter, soon after The Sporting Times, a Kentucky-based high school sports news magazine, took the field and brought its trademark suit. Now, in the late innings of this litigation, the plaintiff has argued not only that MGM is not entitled to legal fees under the Lanham Act because it had a reasonable duty to protect its mark, but also that the court should sua sponte relieve plaintiff from the original court order dismissing the suit.

The Sporting Times originally alleged that MGM and its co-defendants harmed the youth magazine's "squeaky clean" brand when its logo was used for a fictitious headline in a brief montage of news clippings that appeared in a biopic about the life of Bill "Spaceman" Lee (The Sporting Times, LLC v. Orion Pictures, Inc., No. 17-33 (W.D. Ky. filed Feb. 24, 2017)). In addition to his unique "Space Ball" (a high-arcing Eephus pitch), the former left-handed pitcher of the Boston Red Sox was notorious in the 1970s for his outspoken nature and views on cultural issues like the legalization of marijuana. The montage in question originally included "a nine-second shot of the cover of a fictional magazine entitled The Sporting Times, dated July 1976, with the headline 'Boston's Bill "Spaceman" Lee; In an Orbit All His Own'."  The image shown was not an actual copy of plaintiff's publication, which did not exist until 2004, and whose mark was not registered until 2008.  After receiving a demand letter, the defendants removed the plaintiff's mark from the film and trailer as a courtesy. Yet plaintiffs still claim that "infringing materials" remain publicly available on social media and other online sources.

In December, a federal judge threw the sports magazine a curveball by granting MGM's motion to dismiss with prejudice, telling plaintiff to hit the showers (The Sporting Times, LLC v. Orion Pictures, Inc., No. 17-33 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 14, 2017)). Ultimately, the court determined that the defendants only made "non-trademark" use of the plaintiff's mark and stated that "nothing about the use of the mark suggests that this 'fictional' magazine, or the real one as published by Plaintiffs, sponsored the film."

In dismissing the plaintiff's trademark infringement and false designation of origin claims, the court held in essence that nothing about the use of the mark in the montage suggested that this "fictional" magazine, or the real one as published by plaintiffs, sponsored the film.  Since it was "simply not plausible in the challenged context that viewers would confuse Plaintiff's Mark as being the 'origin' of the film itself," the court concluded, the Complaint failed "to establish plausibly the Defendants' use of Plaintiff's Mark is anything but a non-trademark use." Furthermore, the court noted, defendants' use of the mark in their expressive 

work was protected by the First Amendment from federal trademark claims and related state law causes of action since it passed both prongs of the Rogers test, requiring the use to (a) bear artistic relevance to the underlying work, and (b) not overtly mislead as to the source of the work.

Finding themselves with a big lead going into the ninth, in January 2018 MGM and its co-defendants, including independent film company Podium Pictures, swiftly filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs totaling around $108,000. Under Section 1117(a) of the Lanham Act, the court may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to the prevailing party in an "exceptional case," which, as defendants claim under Supreme Court precedent, is "simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party's litigating position . . . or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated."

Because plaintiff "had no chance of succeeding," defendants charge, the case was "objectively baseless" and "never should have been prosecuted, much less filed."  The motion goes on to point out that the lawsuit placed an economic burden not on MGM, but on the "small company" Podium Pictures, which produced the film (MGM distributed under its subsidiary Orion). Defendants relate that plaintiff's actions prompted Podium to spend $10,000 to voluntarily remove plaintiff's mark from the film and trailer, before having to spend an additional $50,000 in legal fees to satisfy the retention on its insurance policy – a total that represented a sizeable amount of the biopic's entire budget. Decrying plaintiff's actions as bush league, the studio and its co-defendants argue that plaintiff's claims meet the Supreme Court's description of "a case presenting either subjective bad faith or exceptionally meritless claims."

After defendants filed their motion, The Sporting Times moved to take the field, filing its amended response on March 13th and asserting that because "[n]othing out of the ordinary happened," there was nothing exceptional about the case surrounding Spaceman, which it dubs a "ʿB' movie."  Emphasizing its status as a "small-town publication," plaintiff claims that the defendants "[ran] roughshod"  over plaintiff's trademarks, and such powerhouse entities now seek attorney's fees to "intimidate other small trademark holders from protesting the film industry's general abuse and overreach based upon First Amendment principles."

Citing the principle that mark owners generally police the use of their marks to prevent genericide, plaintiff argued that a decision to send cease and desist letters and litigate to protect a trademark is "almost de rigueur." If the court awarded attorneys' fees in a case with such "plain vanilla facts," plaintiff posited, it would "chill . . . trademark holders' ability to protect their valued asset and . . . dissuade attorneys from taking this type of case." The sports magazine further requested that the court sua sponte relieve plaintiff from its order granting defendants' motion to dismiss, claiming that recent decisions call into question whether defendants' use of the mark in a film and movie trailer are more worthy of First Amendment protection than plaintiff's trademark rights. The plaintiff also argued that the court's decision misapplied the Rogers test, in failing to "distinguish between a movie and its attendant trailer."

Stepping off the mound, defendants have made their appeal play, and plaintiff has countered that its claims were not off the plate or far outside litigation norms; whether MGM studios and Podium Pictures ought to be granted an Annie Oakley on its attorney's fees, it's up to the court to make the call.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer Rose LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer Rose LLP
Contact
more
less

Proskauer Rose LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.