U.S. District Court dismisses challenge to hospital’s employee vaccine mandate

Bricker & Eckler LLP
Contact

Bricker & Eckler LLP

On April 1, 2021, Houston Methodist Hospital announced that all of its employees would be required to be vaccinated against COVID-19 by June 7, 2021, but that it would provide accommodations to any employee with disability (under the ADA) or sincerely-held religious belief (under Title VII) that prevented him/her from receiving the vaccine. Nurse Jennifer Bridges and 116 other employees, who did not claim to have pursued such accommodations, sued to block the vaccine requirement. The hospital moved to dismiss the case, and on June 12, 2021, the court granted the dismissal

The court concluded that Bridges wrongful termination claim failed because Texas law only protects employees from being terminated for refusing to commit an act carrying criminal penalties to the worker, and receiving a COVID-19 vaccination carries no such penalties. It affirmed that the Secretary of Health and Human Services had the ability to introduce commercial medical products (such as the COVID-19 vaccines) into interstate commerce in an emergency.

Among other claims, Bridges also asked the court to declare that the vaccine requirement is invalid because it violates federal law protections of “human subjects.”  The court said Bridges had misconstrued this provision and misrepresented the facts and noted that the hospital’s employees are not participants in a human trial.

The court’s decision concluded by stating “Methodist is trying to do their business of saving lives without giving them the COVID-19 virus. It is a choice made to keep staff, patients, and their families safer. Bridges can freely choose to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine; however, if she refuses, she will simply need to work somewhere else.”       

In December 2020, the EEOC confirmed that employers can require that employees receive the COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment, subject to reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities or sincerely-held religious beliefs.

An appeal is expected. 

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bricker & Eckler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bricker & Eckler LLP
Contact
more
less

Bricker & Eckler LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.