U.S. + Germany Patent Newsletter

by Hogan Lovells

[co-authors: Dr. Teresa Christof, Philipp Simon]


Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of IPRs, Requires PTAB to Decide Validity of All Challenged Claims -
Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group & SAS Institute v. Iancu (24 April 2018)

In a highly-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court in Oil States ruled that IPRs do not violate the U.S. Constitution. The challenge was based on a theory that patents provide private rights for patent owners that can only be revoked by a federal district court judge, pursuant to Article III of the Constitution. The Supreme Court rejected this theory, however, finding instead that the decision to grant a patent is a matter involving public rights, and Congress has significant discretion to create mechanisms outside of the courts to adjudicate disputes over public rights. The Court reasoned that IPRs are simply a reconsideration of—or “second look” at—the grant of such public rights, and Congress has the authority to delegate oversight to an administrative agency, like the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). The Court made clear that its decision was narrow, only addressing the constitutionality of IPRs and not to be construed as opining on the Due Process or Takings Clauses of the Constitution.
On the same day, the Supreme Court decided SAS, which also involved IPRs. In SAS, the Court held that when the PTO institutes an IPR, it must decide the patentability of all of the claims that the petitioner has challenged. The Court contrasted the language of the Patent Act concerning IPRs and ex parte reexaminations. For ex parte reexaminations, the statute provides that the PTO has discretion over which claims to review, whereas the statutory language concerning IPRs does not afford the same discretion. The Court explained that the patent statute envisioned IPRs being guided by the initial petition, and as such, it is the petitioner, not the PTO, that defines the scope of review. This decision did not displace the standard for IPR institution, which requires petitioner to show “a reasonable likelihood” that it will prevail on “at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” If the petitioner clears this hurdle, then the PTO must now, according to the Court, proceed to evaluate all challenged claims.


U.S. Patent Updates

Supreme Defect in Priority Claim Sinks Patent – Droplets, Inc. v. E*Trade Bank (19 April 2018)

The Federal Circuit affirmed a finding by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) that a priority claim to an earlier filed provisional application was faulty. As a result, the patent-at-issue was not entitled an earlier priority date and was found invalid as obvious in view of certain prior art. Had the priority claim been effective, it would have predated the prior art and may have avoided invalidity. The patent statute allows for claiming priority to an earlier-filed application so long as the later application includes a “specific reference to the earlier filed application.”
A key issue here is that the statute does not discuss further intermediary priority filings—only the “first application” and the later filed application that claims priority back to the first application. In this case, the patent-at-issue did not expressly state the full chain of priority; instead, it omitted intermediate applications in the priority chain between the original provisional application and the latest-filed application. This omission, according to the court, made the priority claim defective. The court held that the statute requires claiming priority to all applications in the priority chain, including all intermediate applications. Accordingly, if you are prosecuting patent applications in the U.S., take care to include the entire priority chain to ensure a perfected priority claim. Conversely, if accused of infringement, examine whether the asserted patent has a defective priority claim, as it could open the door to more prior art to challenge invalidity.

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Foreign Patent Damages Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp. (16 April 2016)  

On 16 April, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding whether lost profits are available for infringement arising under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f). That section of the Patent Act governs acts of patent infringement where components of a patented invention are supplied from the United States for use in foreign jurisdictions, where such use in the foreign jurisdiction would constitute infringement in the United States. In this case, the parties agree that only the infringing acts occurred domestically in the United States—any damages caused by the infringing acts were incurred in foreign jurisdictions.
In U.S. patent law, there has generally been a presumption against extraterritoriality. This appeared to appeal to at least one Justice, who commented that a “patent doesn’t run to the high seas, and so [patent owner isn’t] protected there.” However, other Justices seemed to latch on to the following analogy: if a French tourist is injured while visiting the U.S., leaving her unable to work, then that tourist would still be able to collect full damages under U.S. tort law even though the damages would accrue based on lost wages for being unable to perform her job in France. Translating that into patent law, some of the Justices appeared in support of allowing patent owners to recover full compensation for all forms of infringement.  A decision is expected by Summer 2018. 

Prior Claim Constructions by Courts Not Binding on PTAB –  Knowles Electronics LLC v. Iancu (6 April 2018)

In a split decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed a PTAB claim construction decision that was broader than two previous claim construction decisions by courts on closely-related terms. The patent-at-issue in this case covered a cool microphone on a chip with a special housing for shielding a transducer when in use in a hearing aid. The PTAB construed the term “package” more broadly than the Federal Circuit had done twice before on closely-related claims.
In two prior decisions, the Federal Circuit held that the term “package” required “a second-level connection with a mounting mechanism,” but the PTAB in this case did not construe the term to require such a limitation. On appeal, the Federal Circuit said the PTAB’s broader construction was allowable and held that the prior claim constructions were not binding on the PTAB. The court commented that the prior decisions “in some circumstances . . . may be relevant to the PTAB’s later construction of that same disputed term.”

PTAB Must Clearly Articulate Rationale for Obviousness in IPRs Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (28 March 2018)

The Federal Circuit reversed a non-obviousness finding by the PTAB because the PTAB failed to “adequately explain its reasoning on a point that was central to its [obviousness] analysis.” The claims of Cisco’s networking patent-at-issue recited a concept of “tunneling” through an intermediate network. During the IPR, Arista presented a prior art reference that disclosed a concept akin to tunneling. Arista made a specific argument about how the prior art reference rendered the idea of tunneling obvious—a central argument to Arista’s obviousness claims. In its decision, the PTAB did not particularly address this argument and found that the prior art did not render Cisco’s patent obvious.
The PTAB has an obligation to issue final written decisions that are not arbitrary, capricious, or unsupported by substantial evidence. To fulfill this obligation, it must specifically address all arguments raised by the parties and explain its rationale for siding with one of the two. The failure to expressly address Arista’s obviousness argument in this case was reversible error, according to the Federal Circuit. Therefore, if the PTAB ever issues a final written decision in an IPR that you are involved in, examine the decision to ensure the PTAB specifically addressed all of your arguments; if the final written decision ignores any of your arguments, then there may be good arguments to appeal that decision.


Germany Patent Updates

Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf Clarifies Standards for Preliminary Injunctions and Personal Liability of Managing Directors Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf, I-15 U66/17  (11 January 2018)

With this judgment, the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf has further developed the standard for obtaining a preliminary injunction. In the same judgment, the court established further criteria regarding the personal liability of managing directors for patent infringement.
According to settled case law of the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf (Decision Harnkatheterset), a preliminary injunction is regularly denied if the validity of the patent is not proven beyond doubt in any of the following: (1) a prior first instance validity judgment of the German Patent Court; (2) a prior decision of the opposition division of the European Patent Office; or (3) a validity determination by the German Patent and Trademark Office in inter-partes proceedings. As an exception to this requirement, a court may grant a preliminary injunction if exceptional circumstances prevail which make it unreasonable for the plaintiff to await the outcome of the pending opposition or nullity proceedings, even without such first instance decision. The case at hand constituted a case of such exceptional circumstances.
In this case, the plaintiff requested a preliminary injunction against the defendant because the defendant had distributed razor blades. The plaintiff had become aware about this distribution in April 2017. The patent-in-suit expired in February 2018. In 2012, a nullity action was withdrawn after a preliminary opinion of the German Federal Patent Court had designated the patent as valid. The court in this case held that it would be unreasonable for the plaintiff to await the infringement judgment in the main proceedings because such judgment cannot be expected before the expiry of the patent in suit. Rather, effective legal protection can only be guaranteed by means of preliminary injunction proceedings.
In the same case, but on an unrelated legal question, the court ruled that the defendant's managing director was not personally liable for the patent infringement solely due to his position in the company, but rather because of his positive knowledge of the infringement of the patent-in-suit. The plaintiff's warning letter was addressed to the management board in general. In this case, the managing director cannot escape his liability simply by referring to his task in the company.

It remains to be seen whether future decisions will provide deeper information on which concrete measures are necessary and reasonable for a managing director in order to avoid liability.

Uncertainty After Constitutional Complaint
Against German UPC-Ratification Law Continues

The decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union has not been the only thing that brought unexpected uncertainty into whether and when the Unified Patent Court system would start working. A constitutional complaint made last summer against a German law, which had ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA), made things even more complicated. The German Constitutional Court (FCC) did not immediately refuse the complaint, but instead asked the German Federal President to put the execution of the ratification law on hold.
The FCC has called on 27 third parties, ranging from the German Federal Bar Association to the Federal States and the German Parliament, to submit amicus curiae briefs in the matter. In the meantime, the FCC has received a number of briefs that reason that the complaint is inadmissible or unfounded. Though the case has been listed among those that the FCC plans to decide in 2018, no hearing date has been set. One can only speculate about what this means for the possible outcome of the complaint.
Since the FCC did not immediately reject the complaint, it might be presumed that the FCC at least found the arguments against the ratification law noteworthy. If the FCC, after reviewing the amicus curiae briefs, deems the complaint admissible, a ruling on the case could be expected around the end of 2018. If the FCC refers one or several questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the proceeding might not come to an end until 2019. As the UK will withdraw from the EU by March 2019, the German complaint adds even more pressure to the timetable and uncertainty to the process of ratification.

Federal Supreme Court Sets Boundaries: Generalization of "Digital Book" to "Display Device" is Inadmissible Added Matter – Federal Supreme of Germany, X ZR 63/15 (4 April 2018)

In “Digital Book,” the Federal Supreme Court established further criteria on the circumstances of when there is an “added matter” defense (also referred to in Europe as an “inadmissible extension”). This ruling clarifies the Federal Supreme Court's former decision X ZR 107/12 – Kommunikationskanal (“Communication Channel”).  In “Communications Channel,” the Federal Supreme court ruled that a more general technical teaching that is claimed in a later application could claim priority to a parent application, if this general teaching could easily be derived from the earlier application. “Digital Book” now clarifies the limits of this approach.
According to the ruling, a later patent application is inadmissibly extended if (a) a specific feature (not claimed in the later application) is present in all preferred embodiments of the invention of the earlier application and (b) this feature is of significant importance for solving the task of the patent. In such case, the patentee may not claim protection for an embodiment without this feature in the later application. In the case at hand, all exemplary embodiments described in the parent patent application were related to the specific feature of a “digital book” and required use of the same. Particularly decisive was the fact that the parent application repeatedly emphasized the simple handling of a digital book: A digital book allowed reading literature containing an arbitrary number of pages with a lightweight and handy device. Among other things, the simple handling of a digital book was achieved by providing a swivel joint for folding the casing of the digital book open and shut.
The Court thus held that a display device—which was then claimed in the later application—encompassed devices different from a digital book. Accordingly, the Federal Supreme Court confirmed the assessment of the Federal Patent Court and considered that the generalization of the originally disclosed term “digital book” to “display device for reproduction of text and/or image information” amounted to an inadmissible extension. It remains to be seen whether this decision will affect the more generous standard of the Federal Patent Court, in applying the inadmissible extension doctrine in the future.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hogan Lovells | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hogan Lovells

Hogan Lovells on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.