Under Construction - March 2016

Letter from the Editor

by James J. Sienicki

Welcome to the first edition of our Under Construction newsletter for 2016.

Indemnity laws and clauses are a big part of construction contracts. They can make or break a project. Defend and indemnify obligations have the potential to impose the most drastic consequences on a party to a construction contract, forcing a party to assume a wide variety of obligations and risks that may or may not be insurable and may be beyond the party’s reasonable ability to control. The law of indemnification varies from state to state. It is essential that owners, developers, contractors and subcontractors understand that fact. Because of this, we’ve compiled a set of articles that address some of the nuances of indemnification in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada and Utah. When negotiating construction contracts, it is important to pay attention to the indemnity clauses, know the applicable law and ask questions before signing any contract.

We hope you will find these articles informative and enlightening on this very important subject. Please let us know if you want us to address a specific construction issue in a future newsletter. Cheers to a great and successful year ahead!

Jim Sienicki

Indemnity Is a Risky Proposition in Arizona Unless It Is a Specific Obligation

by Richard G. Erickson and Nicole Sornsin

Indemnity is too often litigated in construction cases because contracting parties do not tailor their written agreements to correspond with state law governing the project. Forgetting to incorporate the correct governing law and indemnity language means contractors may assume they have more indemnity rights than the applicable law allows, or it could mean a contract has no teeth to force a party to defend and indemnify a claim arising from the project.

Then again, if contracting parties neglect to include an express defense and indemnity provision altogether, a party seeking indemnity may wind up with an all-or-nothing gamble in trying to prove implied indemnity under common law principles. Without express indemnity provisions in the contract, a party that is itself at fault may be precluded from the benefit of general or implied indemnity, unless that party can prove their fault is merely passive and that they are, therefore, free of active negligence.

On Arizona construction projects, remember these basic rules governing indemnity claims:

  • Public policy prohibits indemnity when a party is solely negligent.
  • On public construction projects, no party can be indemnified for its own negligence.
  • On private construction projects, subject to the sole negligence exception above, Arizona courts will interpret and enforce the duty to defend and indemnify in accordance with the express terms upon which the contracting parties have agreed.
  • If you want to be indemnified on a private project for your own partial fault, it is vital to have indemnity contract language that specifically commits a party to defend and indemnify regardless of any fault by the party seeking indemnity.
  • If the contract lacks an express indemnity clause, on the other hand, a party seeking implied indemnity has the burden of proving it had to pay for the negligence of another party when the negligent party was the one totally at fault.
  • One Arizona case provided that a party seeking indemnity, after reasonably settling a claim that was properly tendered to the responsible party first, may still be indemnified despite the party’s own fault, but the indemnity damages will be apportioned according to the comparative fault of each party.

Since indemnity liability may depend upon proving, in the first instance, the fault or non-negligence of the parties involved, litigating indemnity claims is usually inordinately expensive and may take years before a party is made whole again. Indemnity claims come with significant out-of-pocket risk and expense.

A way to avoid protracted indemnity battles on private projects, or at least to rest more assured of prevailing on an indemnity claim in the end, is to make sure to include a specific indemnity clause in a construction contract—a clause that commits a party to defend and indemnify regardless of the other party’s own fault. A party who wants protection and indemnity (the indemnitee) should also include a requirement in their contract that requires the other party (the indemnitor) to name the indemnitee as an additional insured on the indemnitor’s insurance policies, and then follow through and make sure this happens before work begins. Contracts on public projects need to be consistent with anti-indemnity law. In addition, before choosing to spend the money necessary to enforce your indemnity rights, make sure that the other party either has the insurance or the solvency to satisfy a judgment. It makes no sense to chase indemnity against someone that doesn’t have two nickels to rub together.

Limitations on Indemnity Provisions in Construction Contracts in California

by Mark D. Johnson

Typically, in construction contracts, indemnity provisions are found in contracts between owners and general contractors and in contracts between general contractors and subcontractors. In contracts between owners and general contractors, indemnity provisions usually require the general contractor to reimburse the owner for any loss from a claim or claims brought by a third-party arising out of work performed by the general contractor. Contracts between general contractors and subcontractors generally have indemnity provisions requiring the subcontractor to reimburse the general contractor for any loss from a claim or claims arising out of work performed by the subcontractor. Indemnity provisions also may have a duty to defend the indemnified party or indemnitee in a lawsuit or other legal proceeding such as arbitration. These defense provisions might also require the indemnifying party or indemnitor to defend the indemnitee using counsel selected or approved by the indemnitee.

However, many states, including California, place limits on the permissible scope of indemnity provisions. The main limitations on indemnity provisions in California are the following:

  • No Indemnity for Active Negligence or Willful Misconduct
    Civil Code section 2782.05 provides that indemnity provisions in construction contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2013 in which a subcontractor is required to indemnify and/or defend a general contractor, construction manager, or other subcontractor for their active negligence or willful misconduct, for defects in design furnished by such persons, or for claims that do not arise out of the scope of work of the subcontractor are void and unenforceable.
  • No Indemnity for Sole Negligence or Willful Misconduct
    Civil Code section 2782(a) provides that indemnity provisions in construction contracts in which an indemnitor is required to indemnify an indemnitee for their sole negligence or willful misconduct are void and unenforceable.
  • No Imposition of Liability on Contractor for Active Negligence by Public Agencies
    Civil Code section 2782(b)(1) provides that indemnity provisions in construction contracts with public agencies entered into on or after January 1, 2013 that purport to impose on the contractor, or relieve the public agency from liability for the active negligence of the public agency are void and unenforceable.
  • No Indemnity by Public Agencies for Active Negligence
    Civil Code section 2782(b)(2) provides that indemnity provisions in construction contracts with public agencies entered into on or after January 1, 2013 in which a general contractor, subcontractor or supplier of goods or services is required to indemnify a public agency for its active negligence are void and unenforceable.
  • No Indemnity by Private Builder Not Acting as Contractor
    Civil Code section 2782(c) provides that indemnity provisions in construction contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2013 with the owner of privately owned real property (in which the owner is not acting as a contractor or supplier of materials or equipment) in which a general contractor, subcontractor or supplier of goods or services is required to indemnify the owner for its active negligence are void and unenforceable. However, this section 2782(c) does not apply to homeowners performing home improvement projects on their own single-family dwellings.
  • Limitations on Indemnity in Residential Construction Contracts
    Civil Code section 2782(d) provides that indemnity provisions in residential construction contracts entered into after January 1, 2009 in which an indemnitor is required to indemnify and/or defend a builder or general contractor are unenforceable to the extent that the builder or general contractor is negligent, for defects in design furnished by the builder or general contractor, or if a claim does not arise out of the work of the indemnitor.
  • Limitations on Indemnity by Public Agencies Against Design Professionals
    Civil Code section 2782.8 provides that indemnification provisions in design professional contracts entered into with a public agency after January 1, 2007 in which a design professional is required to indemnify and/or defend a public agency are unenforceable except for claims that arise out of negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional. This section shall not be waived by agreement of the parties.
  • Limitations on Indemnity in Wrap-Up Insurance Policies
    Civil Code sections 2782.9 through 2782.96 provide that indemnity provisions in residential construction contracts with a wrap-insurance policy, also known as an Owner Controlled Insurance Policy entered into after January 1, 2009 in which an enrolled and participating subcontractor or other participant in the Owner Controlled Insurance Policy program is required to indemnify and/or defend another party for any claim covered by the wrap-insurance program are unenforceable.

Construction and Construction Contract Indemnity in Colorado

by Daniel R. Frost

Generally speaking, indemnity clauses in Colorado construction contracts are enforceable in accordance with their terms, where the terms are clear and unambiguous. Indemnity obligations can be either found in contract provisions or common law indemnity principles. And indemnity provisions in a construction contract may allow the parties to shift certain risks and obligations to other parties. Often times these provisions can be drafted quite broadly and can be quite onerous without affecting their enforceability.

There is one notable exception to the enforceability of indemnity provisions in Colorado - the anti-indemnity statute. The Colorado anti-indemnity statute significantly affects the enforceability of indemnification provisions in Colorado construction contracts. With some limited exceptions, construction contracts requiring a party to a construction agreement to cover losses associated with another party’s own negligence are void.

Colorado’s anti-indemnity statute does not apply to property owned or operated by railroads or public districts; nor does it apply to rental agreements. However, for virtually all other types of construction contracts entered into after July 1, 2007, any provision in a construction agreement that requires a person to indemnify, insure or defend in litigation another person against liability for damage caused by the negligence or fault of the indemnitee is void.

Colorado statutes do provide for allocation of liability between tortfeasors, which some trial courts will follow even in the case of a breach of contract claim. Thus, a party can be indemnified to the extent some other party was found to be the cause of the plaintiff’s damages. But, as noted, only in very rare circumstances can a party to a construction contract be indemnified for its own negligence.

It is also worth noting, in the litigation context, that claims for indemnity “arise at the time the third person’s claim against the claimant is settled or at the time final judgment is entered on the third person’s claim, whichever comes first.” Such claims must be brought within 90 days after the claims arise. The 90-day rule does not act as a ‘tolling’ provision for Colorado’s six-year statute of repose, meaning that a party asserting an indemnity claim may not wait until final judgment to bring indemnity claims, if final judgment is not entered before the end of the repose period.

In response to Colorado’s anti-indemnity statute, the Insurance Service Offices (ISO) has developed several Colorado-specific forms that take into account the issues resulting from that legislation. These forms limit coverage consistent with the limitations of the statute. As a further caveat, Colorado prohibits any provisions in a construction agreement that requires one party to insure another party against liability on a construction project.

To address these issues, contractors or developers can consider requiring subcontractors to obtain ongoing and completed operations coverage, naming the contractor or developer as an additional insured. Subcontractors should evaluate whether their policies cover, to the extent possible, their indemnity obligations. Indemnity and insurance provisions in construction contracts should be carefully tailored to deal with these issues. And parties wishing to assert indemnity claims based upon settlements or judgments must act promptly to preserve their rights.

Construction Contract Indemnity in Nevada

by Leon F. Mead II

Nevada’s law related to construction indemnity has undergone significant alterations over the last few years. Nevada law historically supported the concept of freedom of contract, and previously even enforced Type I contractual indemnity and defense provisions - requiring indemnity for an actor’s own negligent acts. This draconian protection of the freedom to contract began creating havoc in the residential construction defect world after the adoption of Nevada’s residential construction defect laws in 1995, found at NRS 40.600 through 40.695, inclusive (collectively herein “Chapter 40”).

Negligence played a significant role in Chapter 40 claims. Unlike the majority of jurisdictions, the Nevada Supreme Court (the "Court") found in Olson v. Richard, 120 Nev. 240, 89 P.3d 31 (2004) that the then unsettled status of the State’s common law regarding the applicability of the economic loss rule when Chapter 40 was enacted, must have meant that the legislature intended to allow negligence claims for residential construction defects. This brought the availability of insurance coverage in a residential construction defect case to the fore. Subcontractors who signed such Type I indemnity clauses were forced to incur hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal costs incurred by their customers, often even when the subcontractors own work was not claimed defective by impacted homeowners.

At the same time, Type I indemnity and defense obligations in the commercial and industrial construction industry had little impact on subcontractors. Commercial project owners were able to resolve conflicts more simply because they were far more interested in resolving deficient construction work than in recouping financial windfalls. The few attempts to claim that the economic loss rule did not apply in commercial construction cases met with little support from the Court who, in cases such as Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. v. Mandalay Resort Group, 125 Nev. 66, 206 P.3d 81 (2009) and Halcrow, Inc. v. Dist Ct., 129 Nev. ___, 302 P.3d 1148 (2013), carved out a separate distinct indemnity path for commercial construction cases where the parties contractually allocated such risks. In commercial construction defect cases, the economic loss rule applied to bar claims for negligence, and such claims were resolved through contractual indemnity provisions.

Despite the lack of any meaningful distinction between defect claims in residential construction and commercial construction, the disparate impacts generated by these decisions became harder for the Court to justify. But as the legislature failed time and again to craft a statutory solution, the Court began imposing limited restrictions on Type I indemnity in residential construction defect cases, requiring strict and explicit language notifying a subcontractor that it was responsible for the negligence of others before such indemnity clauses would be enforced. In George L. Brown Ins. V. Star Ins. Co., 126 Nev. ___, 237 P.3d 92 (2010), the Court required express or explicit reference to the indemnitee’s own negligence as a requirement for enforcement of a Type I indemnity obligation. In Reyburn Lawn & Landscape v. Plaster Dev., 127 Nev. ___, 255 P.3d 268 (2011), the Court took this even further by extending the explicit language requirement to contributory negligence claims. Then in United Rentals v. Wells Cargo, 128 Nev.Adv.Op. 59 (2012) the Court limited “to the extent caused” indemnity provisions to provide defense obligations only after the proximate cause of an injury was established. While all these cases demonstrated a diminished desire from the Court to enforce Type I and Type II indemnity provisions for negligence in construction cases, they could still be enforced provided contracts were drafted in the correct manner, and claims were properly asserted. Once again, however, the practicality that such provisions were more often enforced in residential construction cases did little to help the residential subcontractor under Chapter 40 cases.

Finally, with the 2014 election installing a conservative majority in both legislative houses for the 2015 legislative session, substantial reform for Chapter 40 was achieved. AB125, while virtually eliminating residential construction defect claims entirely, has substantially restricted the application of indemnity, defense and hold harmless provisions in residential construction defect cases to Type III indemnity only – that is, residential subcontractors can only be obligated to defend and indemnify home builders from construction claims related to their own work. Any claim for indemnity based on a Type I or Type II indemnity provision that relates to the work of a third party subcontractor is not enforceable. Further, subcontractors included in “wrap-up” insurance coverage cannot be charged multiple deductibles for each residence in a subdivision. Each wrap-up policy must be limited to a specific project only, and the cost of such policies to indemnifying subcontractors may not exceed the cost of the subcontractors otherwise available insurance coverage outside the wrap-up policies. Indemnity clauses violating these statutes are void and unenforceable, as against the public policy of the State.

AB125 specifically does not apply to non-residential projects (including apartment buildings) and other commercial projects. The distinctions between residential and commercial construction defect claims, however, continue to be minimal. Moreover, the significance of a stated statutory public policy not to enforce Type I and Type II indemnity provisions cannot be completely lost on the Nevada appellate court judges. Whether the Court will use the statutory prohibitions to begin closing the residential – commercial construction project distinction remains to be seen.

Allocating Risk Under Utah Anti-Indemnity Laws

by Allison Brown

Before the first forms are up or site prep has even begun, most frameworks for bearing the risk of a construction project have already been secured. Owners, general contractors, subs, suppliers and design professionals frequently incorporate indemnity provisions in construction contracts to shift the financial responsibility of worksite accidents and losses. Most often, that responsibility is shifted to subcontractors or their insurance companies through “hold harmless,” “indemnify” and “defend” provisions. Through these indemnity agreements, a subcontractor becomes an “indemnitor” and promises to defend and reimburse the “indemnitee” against various losses incurred in relation to the construction project.

Utah Anti-Indemnity Legislation

Concerned that an indemnitee who knows that another party is ultimately responsible for the indemnitee’s negligence may not act as carefully as it would if it bore responsibility for its own actions, many state legislatures have passed anti-indemnity laws. Utah is one such state. Under Utah construction law, an indemnitor can contract to indemnify an indemnitee only to the extent of the indemnitor’s negligence; i.e. a subcontractor cannot be required to indemnify its general contractor in the event the general is solely or partially negligent. U.C.A. 13-8-1. Additionally, Utah law prohibits contractual limitations of liability arising out of services of architects, engineers, land surveyors or other design professionals. U.C.A. 13-8-2 states that an agreement between a contractor and subcontractor may not limit the owner’s or the design professional’s liability to the subcontractor arising out of the design professional’s services. This prohibition does not apply if the design professional was retained under a design-build or turn-key agreement.

Alternatives to Indemnity Provisions

Such restrictions on indemnification agreements are becoming increasingly common throughout the United States, causing parties to construction contracts to look for alternative techniques to allocate risk. Two principal methods are contractual liability insurance and additional insured coverage.

Contractual Liability Insurance. One potential way to circumvent anti-indemnity laws is to require an indemnitor to procure liability coverage for an “insured contract”. The idea is that an agreement to procure insurance is distinct from an agreement to indemnify. Under this method, an indemnitor essentially assumes an indemnitee’s tort liability by obtaining liability insurance, but the indemnitee does not become an insured party, nor does the indemnitee obtain independent rights under the indemnitor’s policy.

Additional Insured Coverage. Going one step further in shifting risk from the indemnitee, parties to a construction contract can agree that the indemnitor will name the indemnitee as an additional insured on the indemnitor’s CGL insurance policy. Through an endorsement, an additional insured obtains independent rights to and direct claims against the indemnitor’s policy. And unlike plain contractual liability insurance, additional insured coverage means the indemnitee’s defense costs are not constrained by the policy’s coverage limits.

A reading of the precise language in Utah’s anti-indemnity statute might have suggested that Utah law prohibits construction contracts providing for contractual liability insurance or additional insured coverage: U.C.A 13-8-1 invalidates indemnification provisions in construction contracts and defines an indemnification provision as “an agreement… requiring the promisor to insure, to hold harmless, indemnify, or defend the promisee or others against liability…” (emphasis added). However, in 2001 the Utah Court of Appeals in Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. Transcon. Ins. Co., 27 P.3d 594 (Utah Ct. App. 2001) found that a clause in a construction contract that required a subcontractor to procure liability insurance and name the general contractor was not an “indemnification provision” and therefore, did not violate U.C.A. 13-8-1. “[T]he plain meaning of the statute voids only agreements requiring one party in a construction contract to personally insure against liability stemming from the other party’s negligence” Id. at 598.


Although Utah law prohibits indemnitors from indemnifying an indemnitee for the indemnitee’s own negligence—sole or partial—indemnitees’ tool belts are not altogether emptied. Parties to construction contracts are not prevented from including provisions for contractual liability insurance and additional insured coverage in order to construct the desired distribution of a project’s risk.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Snell & Wilmer | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Snell & Wilmer

Snell & Wilmer on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.