USPTO Alert – New guidance for registering geographic terms for meats & cheeses

Hogan Lovells
Contact

Hogan Lovells

The United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) issues new guidance for trademark applications covering certain cheese and processed meat products when an applied-for mark includes geographic wording that does not indicate geographic origin, but otherwise may be generic for such goods.

What’s in a name?

Certain geographic terms may be protected geographic indications of origin (e.g., Champagne, Roquefort) while others are generic for a product (e.g., French fries, Texas toast). Certain other terms, while previously geographic indications of origin, have now lost their geographic significance and can also be considered generic for the product (e.g., “cheddar” cheese, “brie” cheese, “bologna” meat).

New USPTO guidance relates to this third category – “geo-significant terms.” The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), or international food standards body Codex Alimentarius (Codex) require producers to satisfy specific requirements (known as “standards of identity”) to market certain cheese or processed meat products with these geo-significant terms that are now common names of a product. These names include but are not limited to:

  • CHEDDAR, EDAM, ROMANO, and PROVOLONE (regulated by FDA);
  • FRANKFURTER, WIENER, BOLOGNA, and BRAUNSCWEIGER (regulated by USDA);
  • BRIE, CAMEMBERT, EDAM, GOUDA, and HAVARTI (regulated by the Codex).
    As standards of identity relate solely to production methods and ingredients, there is no requirement by FDA, USDA, or the Codex that a product come from a specific place, although many of these terms identify a product that once came only from the geographic location referred to by the name (e.g., cheddar cheese originated in Cheddar, England). As such, these terms are not certification or collective marks of regional origin (which refer to the place the product comes from and meet specific quality standards); they are instead standards of identity (food-labeling requirements intended to prevent consumers from being misled as to the nature of the product they are buying).

New guidance

As these “geo-significant” terms no longer indicate a single source, the USPTO takes the position that the inclusion of these terms on lists of standards of identity in FDA, USDA, or Codex databases is strong evidence that this geo-significant wording is generic for the identified cheese or processed meat goods.
The USPTO advises examining attorneys to research whether a particular geo-significant term is a standard of identity for the goods specified in the application at either FDA, USDA, or in the Codex database. If so, the examining attorney will either refuse registration or require a disclaimer of the geo-significant term in accordance with USPTO practice.

Additionally, when there is evidence that the accuracy of a product’s compliance with a standard of identity is material to consumer purchasing decisions (i.e., a consumer bought the product thinking it was the particular cheese or processed meat named in the mark), a mark incorporating such terms used on non-compliant products would be deceptive within the meaning of the Trademark Act. The examining attorney must then require that the applicant amend the identification of goods to include the geo-significant term.
If a mark incorporates a standard of identity that relates to cheese or processed meats for services, the examining attorney must contact the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy before taking any action on the application.

Next steps

If you seek to register a mark containing a “geo-significant” term, ensure that the term is included in the recitation of goods (e.g., seek registration for not just “meat,” but “bologna”; not “cheese,” but “cheddar cheese”) to avoid potential deceptiveness issues. Additionally, ensure that your cheese or meat product is actually compliant with a FDA, USDA, or Codex standard of identity to avoid further scrutiny at the USPTO (and these other food regulatory bodies).

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hogan Lovells | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Hogan Lovells
Contact
more
less

Hogan Lovells on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.