"SEC Issues New FAQs on Municipal Advisor Rule"

by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

On May 19, 2014, the SEC issued an updated set of FAQs on the rule defining and requiring municipal advisors to register with the SEC (the Rule). The updated FAQs provide clarification on several important issues for certain market participants, most notably regarding (1) due diligence requirements regarding proceeds of municipal securities, (2) the status of proceeds of municipal securities in public pension funds and (3) advising a municipal entity or obligated person indirectly through a third party. We discuss these clarifications below, along with other significant new interpretations contained in the FAQs. Please note that we have not addressed every topic that the SEC covers in the FAQs; the full text is available here: http://www.sec.gov/info/municipal/mun-advisors-faqs.pdf.

Transitional Guidance for Identifying Proceeds of Municipal Securities

In Question 11.1, the SEC clarifies the diligence required to make a determination as to whether the advice that a market participant is providing is regarding the investment of proceeds of municipal securities. Noting the difficulties in making such a determination, the FAQs ease the diligence burden with respect to accounts or investments in place before July 1, 2014. The SEC states that, unless a market participant actually knows or reasonably should have known that an existing account or investment contains proceeds of municipal securities, a market participant may conclude that such an account or investment does not contain such proceeds. The guidance provides that a market participant may use a reasonable diligence process, based on all facts and circumstances, to form the basis of this determination. Factors that may be considered in this process include, but are not limited to “(1) the quantity of existing accounts and the relative administrative burdens and costs of determining whether such accounts contain proceeds of municipal securities, (2) the nature and term of existing investments and the relative potential for future advice on those investments, and (3) an assessment of the potential likelihood that a particular client uses proceeds of municipal securities in light of the nature of the particular client’s business.”

The SEC provides as specific examples of a potentially reasonable diligence effort both (1) a review of account names for those that suggest a connection to municipal securities and (2) sending a written notice to clients stating that if the client does not respond with written representations regarding the nature of the account’s proceeds, it will be assumed that the account contains no proceeds of municipal securities. Taking these factors in their totality, to the extent that advice is being provided to a municipal entity, this would allow a market participant to satisfy the diligence requirement by using negative consent letters or notices with respect to accounts or investments in place prior to July 1, 2014. For those accounts or funds accepted after July 1, 2014, market participants will need to obtain written representations from the municipal entity regarding proceeds as set forth in the Rule.

Maintaining Status as Proceeds of Pension Obligation Bonds

In Question 11.2, the guidance provides that proceeds of pension obligation bonds lose their character as proceeds of municipal securities when contributed to the public pension plan only if, upon such contribution, the proceeds are required to be used for the exclusive benefit of pension beneficiaries and are treated as spent under applicable state law. If the municipal entity segregates the proceeds or retains control over them for any purpose other than for the exclusive benefit of pension beneficiaries, the proceeds continue to constitute proceeds of municipal securities until they are spent (that is, until they are used to pay pension benefits or carry out other authorized purposes of the bonds). As this clarification does not provide a blanket carve out for proceeds of municipal securities contained in pension funds, it appears market participants will still need to engage in diligence efforts to determine the nature of the funds in question.

Indirect Advice

In Question 1.3, the SEC states that a market participant that provides advice with respect to municipal financial products or the issuance of municipal securities to a municipal entity or obligated person indirectly through a third party professional retained by such municipal entity or obligated person would be required to register as a municipal advisor unless an exclusion or exemption applies. The SEC makes clear that even if the third party is a registered municipal advisor (unless that third party satisfies the independent registered municipal advisor (IRMA) exemption) providing advice to that third party regarding actions to be taken by the municipal entity or obligated person is covered and could trigger registration. The SEC bases this interpretation on the language in the Rule defining municipal advisor activities to include providing advice “on behalf of” a municipal entity or obligated person.

“Relying” on Advice of an IRMA

In Question 3.5, the SEC clarifies that for a municipal entity or obligated person to “rely” on the advice of an IRMA to satisfy the IRMA exemption, the municipal entity or obligated person must seek and consider the advice, analysis and perspective of the IRMA. However, it is not necessary to follow the advice of the IRMA in order to satisfy the exemption. Accordingly, a market participant may still rely on the IRMA exemption (assuming all of its requirements are satisfied) even in cases where its and the IRMA’s recommendations diverge and the client follows the advice of the market participant; provided that the client has considered the IRMA’s analysis.

Independence of an IRMA

In Question 3.6, the SEC elaborates on the independence requirement for IRMAs. This clarification makes clear that both the IRMA entity and the employees of the IRMA entity working on the applicable matter must be independent from the market participant entity seeking to rely on the exemption. Conversely, the market participant’s employees working on the applicable matter must also be independent from the IRMA firm.

Entity Level Analysis:

The SEC states in the guidance that a registered municipal advisor will be deemed independent from a market participant if it is not, and within the prior two years was not, directly or indirectly, controlling, controlled by or under common control with the market participant.

Individual Employee Level Analysis:

The SEC goes on to clarify that individual employees of a registered municipal advisor participating in the municipal advisory activities at hand must not be, and within the prior two years must not have been, employed by the market participant seeking to rely on the IRMA exemption in the capacity of an Associated Individual (defined as an individual serving in one of the capacities described in Section 15B(e)(7)(A) or (B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the exemption to be satisfied. Conversely, the independence requirement is not satisfied if an employee of the market participant who is engaged in the applicable municipal advisory activities is, or within the prior two years was, employed by the registered municipal advisor in the capacity of an Associated Individual.

Obligated Person Capacity

Advice on a New Money Issuance of Municipal Securities:

In Question 10.1, the guidance confirms that with respect to a new money issuance of municipal securities, a private entity is not an obligated person until it begins the process of applying to, or negotiating with, a municipal entity to issue conduit bonds on its behalf. As an example, the guidance provides that advising a private university on debt-financing alternatives, one of which is to seek financing from a new money issuance of municipal securities by a municipal entity, is not advice to an obligated person and does not trigger municipal advisor status. However, once the private university decides to seek such financing and begins the process of applying to or negotiating with the municipal entity to issue conduit bonds, the university becomes an obligated person. At that point, advising the municipal on its debt-financing alternatives is covered advice to an obligated person acting in such capacity, absent an applicable exemption.

Advice on an Outstanding Issue of Municipal Securities:

Regarding an outstanding issue of municipal securities on which the private university is an obligated person, the guidance provides that advising the private university regarding redeeming such outstanding issue early or refinancing it is advice to an obligated person acting in such capacity. However, advising the private university on a refunding issue only becomes advice to an obligated person acting in such capacity once the private university has begun the process of applying to or negotiating with the municipal entity.

Advice by Dual Employees

In Question 13.1, the guidance confirms that a dual-hatted employee may provide advice within the scope of the bank exemption while acting in the capacity of a bank employee, and advice within the scope of the underwriter exclusion while acting in the capacity of a broker-dealer, if such employee first discloses to the municipal entity or obligated person the capacity in which the employee is acting. The guidance notes that any person serving in more than one capacity in the same transaction should consider any potential conflicts of interest that may arise.

Download PDF

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.