Brooks Kushman P.C.

Contact
Share
Info
150 W 2nd St
Suite 400N
Royal Oak, Michigan 48067, United States
Phone: (248) 358-4400
Fax: (248) 358-3351
Areas Of Practice
  • Commercial Law & Contracts
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law & Trade
  • Litigation
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • Michigan
  • Nevada
Number of Attorneys
51-99 Attorneys

Dupes, Not Counterfeits: Why Look-Alike Products Are the Trademark Battleground of 2026

“Dupes” are no longer just a social media trend or a consumer wink-wink. They are now a serious brand-protection issue sitting at the intersection of trademark law, design rights, and digital marketing. The key legal question is… more
 /  Business Torts, Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Ford IPRs Instituted at Patent Trial and Appeal Board

On January 16, 2026, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) instituted two inter partes review (IPR) proceedings for Brooks Kushman client Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and denied Patent… more
 /  Intellectual Property

What’s In a Name? The Strategic Value of Strong Trademarks

“What’s in a name?” That which we call a good, by any other name, would it be as valuable? Conceiving a trademark is much like crafting a poem – it should be original, distinctive, and memorable. Like Shakespeare’s language, a… more
 /  Finance & Banking, Intellectual Property, Mergers & Acquisitions

Redrawing the Obviousness Standard: Graham Factors Overrule Rosen-Durling for Design Patents

Brooks Kushman serves as design patent counsel for Ford Motor Company and has closely followed this case. Attorneys Frank Angileri and Marc Lorelli from Brooks Kushman filed an amicus brief on Ford’s behalf in the en banc… more
 /  Intellectual Property

Design Patent Obviousness: Federal Circuit Rehearing and Examiner AI-Assisted Searching

The law for design patent obviousness may change in the upcoming months when a decision is issued from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals from the February 2024 en banc rehearing of LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations… more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

The Broad Implications of Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy on Copyright Damage Recovery

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy has profound implications for copyright disputes. This ruling recalibrates how damages are assessed and could lead to an increase filing of cases… more
 /  Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

License to Compete: Navigating the New Landscape of Intellectual Property in the Wake of the FTC’s Non-Compete Ban

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has introduced a transformative rule that bans most non-compete agreements across various industries.[1] Announced on April 23, 2024, following a 3-2 vote by the FTC Commissioners, the rule… more
 /  Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Consumer Protection, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment Law

Where did you get that information? The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act of 2024

The “Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act of 2024” is a legislative proposal introduced by Representative Adam Schiff aimed at enhancing transparency in the AI industry. This act requires developers of AI models to disclose… more
 /  Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Utah’s Artificial Intelligence Act swings into full-force May 1st

Utah is poised to enforce the Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (“UAIP;” S.B. 0149) a first-of-kind legislation that is going into effect on May 1, 2024. Starting next week, this act will introduce stringent requirements… more
 /  Consumer Protection, Science, Computers, & Technology

Director Vidal Issues Favorable Ruling in Ford IPR

ROYAL OAK, Michigan – Brooks Kushman recently secured a significant victory in an IPR dispute involving 4G wireless technology. Neo Wireless sued several automakers including Ford Motor Company for patent infringement. Ford and… more
 /  Intellectual Property

From Patents to Policy: The Potential Ripple Effects of Revising the Chevron Doctrine

The Chevron doctrine, stemming from the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., has profoundly shaped the way U.S. regulatory agencies interpret and enforce federal statutes. By… more
 /  Business Organizations, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Labor Unions and Logos: Where to Draw the Line in Analyzing Design Elements?

When we think of trademark infringement, unions don’t typically come to mind. However, in recent headlines, three different companies have alleged trademark infringement against their unions. These companies, Trader Joe’s,… more
 /  Intellectual Property

Innovations at Work: Who Really Owns Employee-Created Inventions?

Let’s say your employee, using company resources, develops a software algorithm that could revolutionize your product line. That’s great news, right? But before you issue a press release and pop the champagne corks, you must… more
 /  Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment Law

What If I Told You None of It Was Accidental? Cetaphil’s Marketing Tactics Balance Taylor Swift Imagery and IP Rights

The Cetaphil #GameTimeGlow commercial, aired before the 2024 Super Bowl, has garnered attention for its portrayal of a father and daughter bonding over football, indirectly tied to Taylor Swift’s appearances at Kansas City… more
 /  Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, International Law & Trade

“Artistic Freedom” v. Trademark Protection: MSCHF’s First Amendment defense face-plants on appeal

In the 2023 Vans vs. MSCHF decision, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Vans, a known skateboarding footwear and apparel brand, against the New York art collective MSCHF. The case centered around MSCHF’s… more
 /  Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, Intellectual Property
Showing 1-15 of 268 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 18
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide