Hudnell Law Group

Contact
Share
Info
800 W. El Camino Real
Suite 180
Mountain View, CA 94040, United States
Phone: (650) 564-3698
Fax: (347) 772-3034
Areas Of Practice
  • Intellectual Property
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
Number of Attorneys
2-10 Attorneys

Federal Circuit Clarifies When Non-Infringing Products Can Form Part of a Royalty Base

On March 6, 2026, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in the case of Exafer Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation (No. 24-2296) reversing a district court’s exclusion of the patent owner’s damages expert’s opinion… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Federal Circuit Confirms Broad USPTO Director Discretion In IPR Institution Decisions

On February 13, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its precedential decision in Apple Inc. v. Squires, Case No. 2024-1864 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2026), affirming the Northern District of… more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property

Seventh Circuit Poised to Rule on Alternative Service by Email on Chinese “Schedule A” Defendants (Maybe)

On February 25, 2026, a panel of the Seventh Circuit held oral argument in the case of Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Import & Export Co., Ltd., No. 25-2205. The appeal arises out of an unsuccessful attempt to void a… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Conflict of Laws, International Law & Trade

Result-Oriented Software Claims Fall Short as Federal Circuit Demands Technological Improvement

On January 22, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Rule 12 dismissal of a patent infringement action brought by US Patent No. 7,679,637 LLC against Google LLC, holding that the asserted… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Second Circuit Limits Alternative Service by Email on Chinese “Schedule A” Defendants in Case of First Impression

Let’s begin with the bottom line: “In sum, we conclude that email service on the Chinese defendants is prohibited by the Hague Service Convention, and thus improper under Rule 4(f)(3).” Smart Study Co., LTD. v. Acuteye-US, No… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Conflict of Laws, International Law & Trade

Federal Circuit Rejects Formalistic Shield to Prosecution History Estoppel

On July 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a $106 million jury verdict in Colibri Heart Valve LLC v. Medtronic CoreValve, LLC, No. 2023-2153, finding that Colibri’s infringement claim under the… more
 /  Health, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Federal Circuit Enforces Gatekeeping Role in Patent Damages Testimony

On May 21, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, reversed a $20 million damages award against Google LLC in a patent infringement dispute with EcoFactor, Inc. EcoFactor, Inc. v… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Intellectual Property

Federal Circuit Issues First Word on AI Patent Eligibility

On April 18, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a patent infringement suit brought by Recentive Analytics, Inc. against Fox Corporation. See Recentive Analytics, Inc. v… more
 /  Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

PTAB Recalibrates Review: New Discretionary Denial Framework and Pre-Institution Reform

In less than a month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has dramatically reformed its policies and procedures for exercising its discretion to deny institution of AIA post-grant proceedings. First, on… more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Differing Burdens of Proof Limits Estoppel Effect of PTAB Final Written Decision

On February 10, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc., reversing and remanding a district court ruling that had dismissed Kroy’s patent… more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Published but not Public? Federal Circuit Confirms Published Patent Applications Count as Prior Art from Filing Date in IPRs.

On January 14, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., No. 23-2346 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2025), addressing whether a published… more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Federal Circuit Weighs the Need for Claim Construction at the Rule 12 Stage

On October 18, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in UTTO Inc. v. Metrotech Corp., No. 2023-1435, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 26340, (Fed. Cir. Oct. 18, 2024) addressing the propriety of conducting claim construction at the… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Generalized Testimony Falls Short in Doctrine of Equivalents Analysis

On October 24, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Nexstep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, affirming the District Court for the District of Delaware’s judgment of… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

The Hidden Hurdles Of Section 101 Eligibility Determinations

On August 6, 2024, in Mobile Acuity Ltd. v Blippar Ltd., __F.4th__; 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17573* (Fed. Cir. Aug. 6, 2024), the Federal Circuit upheld the Rule 12 dismissal of Mobile Acuity’s patent infringement lawsuit against… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Common Patent Litigation Defenses Insufficient To Justify Award Of Attorneys’ Fees

In Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, LLC, et al., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 21348 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 23, 2024), the Federal Circuit, in an opinion authored by Judge Alan D. Albright sitting by designation, vacated and… more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology
Showing 1-15 of 25 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 2
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide