Since the Supreme Court’s opinion in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), litigants and courts alike have struggled to determine whether certain intangible harms are “concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent”…
more
/ Civil Procedure, Privacy, Science, Computers, & Technology
The U.S. government’s Outbound Investment Security Program, stemming from Executive Order 14105 issued in August 2023 and finalized in the Treasury’s rules effective Jan. 2, 2025, reflects ever-increasing U.S. governmental…
more
/ Finance & Banking, International Law & Trade, Securities Law
A recent North Carolina Supreme Court decision, Jackson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 919 S.E.2d 199 (N.C. 2025), highlights the importance of choice of law issues underlying putative class actions…
more
/ Civil Procedure, Conflict of Laws, Consumer Protection
This blog often focuses on traditional, opt-out class actions brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, but there is another common form of mass action: collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Age…
more
/ Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment Law
On June 20, Gov. Greg Abbott signed Texas Senate Bill 140 into law, taking effect on Sept. 1, 2025. Among other things, this bill expands the scope of Texas’ telephone solicitation legislation (the Texas Telephone Solicitation…
more
/ Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection
Businesses — especially service providers like contractors, subcontractors, consultants and design professionals — rely on their contracts to define their risks in the marketplace. For decades, a legal doctrine known as “the…
more
/ Business Torts, Commercial Law & Contracts, Construction Law
On March 12, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a No-Action Letter (NAL) that clarified and expanded the definition of “reasonable steps” an issuer must take when making an offering under Rule 506(c). The…
more
/ Securities Law
On Sept. 4, 2024, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) published a final rule imposing new anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) requirements on…
more
/ Finance & Banking, Securities Law
Savvy employers read and implemented the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s 2024 Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace. Now, portions of that Guidance relating to LGBTQ+ employee rights are defunct…
more
/ Administrative Law, Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
Last fall, the FTC published the Rule Concerning Recurring Subscriptions and Other Negative Option Programs, or the “Click-to-Cancel Rule.” The Rule targets practices where cancellation is intentionally more difficult than…
more
/ Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Commercial Law & Contracts, Consumer Protection
In Labcorp v. Davis, the U.S. Supreme Court was poised to decide if a federal court can certify a class that includes members who lack any Article III injury. But as we discussed last month, the oral argument suggested that a…
more
/ Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law
We’ve written previously about courts’ differing approaches to ascertainability — an implicit requirement under Rule 23 that class members must be identifiable. A pending petition for certiorari in Career Counseling, Inc. v…
more
/ Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection
In its April 17 decision in Cunningham v. Cornell University, the U.S. Supreme Court established a plaintiff-friendly standard for ERISA prohibited transaction claims, resolving a circuit court split. As a result, plan sponsors…
more
/ Business Organizations, Civil Procedure, Finance & Banking, Labor & Employment Law
A few months ago, we wrote about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to grant review in Labcorp v. Davis. As we noted at the time, Labcorp raises a long-debated question of class-action law: Can a federal court certify a class…
more
/ Civil Procedure
A recent Fourth Circuit decision extends the trend of cases refusing to use federal statutes to invalidate arbitration agreements waiving the right to bring class claims in federal court.
The statute at issue in Espin v…
more
/ Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Civil Procedure