Alan S. Kaplinsky

Alan S. Kaplinsky

Ballard Spahr LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › FHA

Share:

Federal District Court Vacates HUD Disparate Impact Rule

In a Fair Housing Act (FHA) case we have been watching for some time, the federal district court in Washington, D.C., recently issued an opinion vacating the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s)...more

11/6/2014 - Administrative Procedure Act Disparate Impact FHA HUD

Disparate impact cases against HUD: Illinois federal court issues decision; update on D.C. case

Because of their potential impact on the CFPB’s conclusion that the ECOA and Regulation B encompass disparate impact claims, we have been following two insurance industry lawsuits involving a challenge to HUD’s Federal...more

9/15/2014 - CFPB Disparate Impact ECOA FHA Homeowner's Insurance HUD Insurers Regulation B

NY Attorney General Files Redlining Lawsuit Alleging Mortgage Discrimination

The New York Attorney General filed a complaint this week in a New York federal court against a national bank headquartered in the state and its holding company alleging that the defendants violated the federal Fair Housing...more

9/5/2014 - Attorney Generals Bank Holding Company Banks Discrimination Disparate Impact DOJ FHA HMDA Mortgages Redlining

Update on disparate impact lawsuit against HUD

The settlement and Supreme Court’s dismissal of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. has increased the potential significance of the lawsuit filed in June 2013 in federal district court in Washington,...more

2/5/2014 - Disparate Impact FHA HUD Mount Holly v Mt. Holly Citizens in Action SCOTUS

Mount Holly settlement update

Last night, the Mount Holly town council met to discuss the tentative settlement in Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. We understand that due to issues concerning the language of the...more

11/7/2013 - Disparate Impact FHA HUD Mount Holly Mount Holly v Mt. Holly Citizens in Action Settlement

Tentative settlement reportedly reached in Mount Holly

It is looking like our prediction that Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. would settle before the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument was accurate. Late yesterday, the Wall Street Journal...more

11/1/2013 - CFPB Disparate Impact ECOA FHA HUD Mount Holly v Mt. Holly Citizens in Action SCOTUS Settlement

More on new disparate impact suit against HUD

Last week, we reported that a lawsuit was filed on June 26 in federal district court in Washington, D.C. challenging HUD’s final rule formalizing its use of disparate impact liability under the Fair Housing Act (FHA)....more

7/2/2013 - Disparate Impact ECOA FHA Homeowner's Insurance HUD Insurers McCarran-Ferguson Act

Settlement discussions underway in Mt. Holly

Since the petition for certiorari in Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. was filed last year, we have raised the possibility that, even if the Supreme Court granted certiorari, the case might...more

7/2/2013 - Certiorari Disparate Impact FHA HUD Mount Holly SCOTUS Settlement

Breaking News! Insurers sue HUD regarding disparate impact

We just heard that a lawsuit was filed in Federal District Court in DC challenging HUD’s final rule stating that the disparate impact theory will apply in assessing whether a company has complied with the Fair Housing Act....more

6/27/2013 - Disparate Impact FHA HUD

Supreme Court grants cert (again) in FHA disparate impact case

Second time’s the charm? For the second time in less than two years, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari today in a case that presents the question whether plaintiffs suing under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) may bring...more

6/18/2013 - Certiorari Disparate Impact ECOA FHA SCOTUS

Supreme Court Agrees Again To Decide Critical Disparate Impact Questions under the Fair Housing Act

The question of whether plaintiffs suing under the Fair Housing Act may bring disparate impact claims is back on the U.S. Supreme Court's docket as a result of the Court's decision today to grant certiorari in Mount Holly v....more

6/17/2013 - CFPB Discrimination Disparate Impact ECOA Fair Lending FHA Redevelopment SCOTUS

Petitioners in Mt. Holly file brief in Supreme Court responding to Solicitor General

The Township of Mount Holly and other petitioners for certiorari in Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. filed a brief on May 24, 2013 in the U.S. Supreme Court replying to the brief filed by...more

5/29/2013 - Disparate Impact FHA HUD SCOTUS

Solicitor General files brief opposing certiorari in Mt. Holly

Last week, the Solicitor General finally filed his brief expressing the views of the United States on whether the U.S. Supreme Court should grant the petition for certiorari pending in Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly...more

5/21/2013 - Certiorari CFPB Disparate Impact FHA HUD Solicitor General

HUD Issues Final ‘Discriminatory Effects’ Rule

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has issued a final rule that provides that if a practice has a "discriminatory effect," HUD or a private plaintiff can establish liability under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), even...more

2/13/2013 - Burden of Proof Discriminatory Effects Rule Disparate Impact FHA HUD

Settlement of Michigan Lending Discrimination Lawsuit Underscores Regulatory Focus on Equal Access to Credit

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has reached a settlement with Community Bank of St. Charles, Michigan, in a federal lending discrimination lawsuit filed by DOJ against the bank....more

1/28/2013 - CFPB Discrimination DOJ ECOA Equal Access to Credit Fair Lending FHA Mortgages Settlement

Will Mt Holly take a dive just like St. Paul?

During one of the panel discussions at the ABA Consumer Financial Services Committee meeting, a speaker indicated that the newly elected Mayor of Mt. Holly, NJ has publicly stated that he is interested in settling the case...more

1/10/2013 - Disparate Impact FHA

16 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1