News & Analysis as of

Motion to Amend

Ballard Spahr LLP

Federal District Court in Texas which recently validated CFPB’s small business data collection rule might entertain “new” funding...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On August 26, 2024, Chief Judge Randy Crane in the E.D. Texas granted summary judgment to the CFPB, denied summary judgment to the trade groups and upheld the validity of the CFPB’s small business data collection rule....more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Texas Judge Rules CFPB Did Not Exceed Authority in Issuing Small Business Reporting Rule

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In a tentative win for the CFPB, a federal judge in Texas ruled on August 26, 2024, that the agency did not exceed its authority when it issued its final Section 1071 small business lending rule. The court also rejected...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Unlawful funding argument raised in challenge to final CFPB rule

Ballard Spahr LLP on

We have previously blogged about how targets of CFPB enforcement actions have asserted that the actions must be dismissed because the investigations were conducted and the lawsuits were brought and are being prosecuted with...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Not Just a Blip: Section 101 as Affirmative Defense

McDermott Will & Emery on

On appeal from a motion to dismiss based on subject matter eligibility, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a district court appropriately analyzed certain claims as representative claims and that the...more

Jones Day

PTAB Forgives MTA Procedural Error

Jones Day on

The Federal Circuit affirmed in part, reversed-in-part and remanded-in-part the Board’s decision in the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,265,096 (the “’096 patent”), and affirmed the Board’s decision as to the cross...more

Knobbe Martens

Responding to Preliminary Guidance Is the Core Purpose of the MTA Pilot Program

Knobbe Martens on

Before Dyk, Prost, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Because the PTAB’s MTA Pilot Program’s core purpose is to allow patent owners to address errors or deficiencies in motions to amend, the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTAB MTA Pilot Program to the Rescue

On review of a final written decision from the Patent Trial & Appeal Board in an inter partes review (IPR), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that all challenged claims were obvious but left open the...more

Jones Day

District Court Charts Middle Ground In Prosecution Bar

Jones Day on

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware recently issued a protective order settling a dispute over the scope of a proposed prosecution bar. Aerin Medical Inc. v. Neurent Medical Inc., No. 23-756, Dkt. Nos. 66, 68...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

The S.D.N.Y. and E.D.N.Y. Issue New Local Rules

On June 17, 2024, the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York released updated joint local civil rules. The new rules are effective in all pending and new matters as of July 1, 2024, except that if a pending deadline is...more

Array

This Week in eDiscovery: Ruling Says Hyperlinks Aren’t Traditional Attachments, Sedona Conference’s Commentary on Privilege Logs...

Array on

Every week, the Array team reviews the latest news and analysis about the evolving field of eDiscovery to bring you the topics and trends you need to know. This week’s post covers the week of May 27-June 2. Here’s what’s...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Navigating Revised Motions to Amend in Inter Partes Review as a Non-active, Joined Party

In CyWee Group LTD. V. ZTE (USA), Inc., No. 21-1855 (Fed. Cir. 2024), ZTE filed an IPR petition against U.S. Patent No. 8,441,438 (the ’438 patent) owned by CyWee, which the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“the Board”)...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Protective Order Forecloses Participation of Litigation Counsel in Motion to Amend Process Before the PTAB

In keeping with precedent, a judge in the District of Delaware issued an oral order restricting the extent of permissible activities for litigation counsel before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The order resolved a...more

Goodwin

Issue 44: PTAB Trial Tracker

Goodwin on

The availability of post-grant proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has changed the face of patent litigation. This periodic digest is designed to keep you up-to-date by highlighting interesting PTAB,...more

Jones Day

PTAB Proposes Permanent MTA Pilot Program Rules

Jones Day on

On March 4, 2024, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPR”) regarding Motion To Amend (“MTA”) Practice and Procedures...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Optimizing Obviousness: Routine Optimization Can Fill in Prior Art Gaps

McDermott Will & Emery on

In an appeal from a Patent Trial & Appeal Board finding of invalidity, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the result-effective variable doctrine can apply even when there is no overlap between a claimed...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTO Seeks Permanent Rules Regarding Motion to Amend Practice Before Board

McDermott Will & Emery on

On March 4, 2024, the US Patent & Trademark Office published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking to revise its Motion to Amend (MTA) pilot program practice in connection with certain America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings....more

Womble Bond Dickinson

USPTO Seeks to Cement PTAB Motion to Amend Pilot Program

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking to revise its rules on amendment practice under the America Invents Act (AIA). Specifically, the USPTO is proposing...more

WilmerHale

PTAB/USPTO Update - March 2024

WilmerHale on

On February 13, the USPTO issued inventorship guidance for AI-assisted innovations. The guidance, effective as of February 13, 2024, emphasizes that AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable and the...more

Fish & Richardson

USPTO Proposes Rules Updating Motion to Amend Practice Before the PTAB

Fish & Richardson on

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) today proposing to update its rules governing motions to amend before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). ...more

Jones Day

New York Bankruptcy Court: Setoff and Unjust Enrichment Cannot Be Asserted as Affirmative Defenses in Bankruptcy Avoidance...

Jones Day on

In a 2021 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit revived nearly 100 lawsuits seeking to recover fraudulent transfers made as part of the Madoff Ponzi scheme. In one of the latest chapters in that resurrected...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - January 2024 #4

Roku, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, Appeal No. 2022-1386 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 19, 2024) In an appeal from the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”), the Federal Circuit addressed a number of findings...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

The Importance of Reasonable Particularity in a Doctrine of Equivalents Argument

In VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation, No. 22-1906 (Fed. Cir. 2023), VLSI sued Intel for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,523,373 (the “’373 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,725,759 (the “’759 patent”). After a jury...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Lack of Diligence in Deposing Key Inventor Precludes Amending Answer to Add Inequitable Conduct Defense

The Central District of California denied a defendant’s motion for leave to amend to allege inequitable conduct due to the defendant’s delay in deposing a key inventor until the end of fact discovery. The district court held...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review | December 2023

Knobbe Martens on

December 2023 Federal Circuit Newsletter (Japanese) - Intel Wrongly Denied Opportunity to Litigate License Defense that Could Unwind $2.1 Billion Judgment - In Vlsi Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation, Appeal No....more

Lathrop GPM

Wisconsin Federal Court Rules Manufacturer’s Planned Expansion to Amazon.com Violated the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law. 

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Wisconsin recently denied a manufacturer’s motion to amend a previously issued injunction in which the manufacturer sought permission to sell products via Amazon.com. Brava Salon Specialists, LLC v. REF...more

347 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 14

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide